Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Winsford Academy

Inspected 16 Jul 2025 · URN 136184

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Amina Modan (lead), David Roberts, Julie Yarwood, Liz Kelly, Nick Lowry

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Jul 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Amina Modan, David Roberts, Julie Yarwood, Liz Kelly, Nick Lowry

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    CW7 2BT

  • Name on report verified

    The Winsford Academy

  • URN verified

    136184

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyconsistentlypositiveeffectiveimprovedsuccessfullyenjoyimproving
Criticismweaknessesstrugglegapsweaklow expectationsnot confidenttoo oftennot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1335w+4
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,311
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of The Winsford Academy Grange Lane, Winsford, Cheshire CW7 2BT

p.1

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

The principal of this school is Emma-Jane McLaren. This school is part of the Halliard Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Jeremy Spencer, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Michael Gorton. 15 and 16 July 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has recently raised its expectations of pupils’ conduct. It uses its ‘STAR’ behaviour routines to share guidance on what is expected of pupils. However, staff do not manage pupils’ behaviour consistently well. Frequent derogatory language, and unkind behaviour towards each other, spoils some pupils’ experiences of the school. Furthermore, many pupils miss school regularly, which makes it harder for them to learn and take part in school life.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has raised its aspirations of what pupils should know and how well they should achieve. Pupils now study a wider breadth of subjects at key stage 4. Nevertheless, the quality of curriculum delivery is weak. Consequently, most pupils underachieve considerably.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have various opportunities to expand their interests and nurture their talents. For instance, pupils enjoy participating in cheerleading club and sporting activities. Some pupils take part in The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award. The school has begun to deliver its ‘10 pledge,’ which helps to widen pupils’ knowledge of the world. However, some pupils do not learn about the world of work when they should.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The new interim executive board has enhanced the governance of the school. This additional expertise has improved the quality of support and challenge given to the school. The trust has provided support to stabilise staffing and strengthen leadership. The school is better placed to make the necessary improvements. It is taking the right action to tackle deep-rooted, historical weaknesses. However, this has not made enough difference to pupils’ behaviour or the quality of education that they receive currently.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has redesigned its curriculum to ensure that subject content is ordered to build pupils’ knowledge over time. Work to ensure that staff implement the curriculum effectively is at an earlier stage of development. Many staff do not expect enough from pupils, especially in terms of the quality and depth of pupils’ work. This leaves pupils ill- equipped to progress through the curriculum and achieve well.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In a small number of subjects, staff explain tasks well and use questioning effectively to check pupils’ understanding. However, this practice is not widespread. Many staff do not have the expertise needed to design activities that help pupils to learn subject content well. This limits the depth of pupils’ understanding. Too often, gaps in pupils’ knowledge are not identified quickly. Misconceptions persist, which hinder pupils’ learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has strengthened how it identifies any additional needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff receive detailed information on how to best meet these needs. Some staff do not use this information consistently well. This limits how well pupils with SEND access the curriculum. Consequently, they do not achieve well. 15 and 16 July 2025

p.2

3

Reading remains a high priority. The school has improved how it identifies gaps in younger pupils’ reading knowledge. Staff use this information to shape support for those pupils who find reading difficult. However, this approach has not reached those older pupils who struggle to read. This means many older pupils do not gain the reading knowledge they need to access the curriculum successfully.

p.3

3

The school has focused sharply on improving pupils’ behaviour. This has begun to yield some positive changes. Classrooms are calmer and there are fewer truancy incidents. However, recent changes have not altered the entrenched, negative attitudes that many pupils hold about learning. Often, staff ignore, or do not challenge, off-task or inattentive behaviour. This compounds the weaknesses in pupils’ learning. The school has begun to tackle the use of derogatory language and unkind behaviour. However, some pupils are not confident that staff address these issues effectively enough.

p.3

3

The school has strengthened its strategies to improve attendance. Although this is beginning to have a positive impact, the number of pupils missing school, particularly pupils with SEND, remains stubbornly high.

p.3

3

The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development is improving. Pupils learn well about themes such as relationships, mental health and safety through the personal, social, health and economic education curriculum. Careers education has been strengthened in key stage 4. Older pupils benefit from encounters with a broad range of organisations and colleges. However, these opportunities are not offered to Year 8 and 9 pupils. This limits how well they make informed choices about their next stage of education.

p.3

3

Most staff appreciate the support that they receive to manage their workload and well- being. Staff are increasingly committed to making the changes needed to raise standards.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The intended curriculum is not delivered well across most subjects. This means that pupils do not build their knowledge well over time. The school should ensure that staff develop the knowledge and skills to design learning activities that help pupils to progress successfully through the curriculum.  Staff do not identify gaps in pupils’ understanding and have low expectations of the quality of work that pupils produce. This means that misconceptions are not addressed well, and pupils’ learning is not secure. The school should ensure that staff use effective assessment strategies to help address gaps in pupils’ knowledge and raise achievement. 15 and 16 July 2025

p.3

4

 The school does not provide enough well-tailored support to help pupils in key stage 4 who struggle with reading. As a result, many older pupils cannot read well enough and this limits how well they access the curriculum. The school should ensure that it provides effective support for all pupils who struggle with reading so that they can access the curriculum well.  Staff do not apply behaviour management systems consistently well. Consequently, off- task or inattentive behaviour remains unchallenged. The school should ensure that behaviour expectations are applied fairly and consistently so that pupils learn without interruption.  Many pupils, particularly pupils with SEND, miss school frequently. This limits their progress through the curriculum. The school should strengthen its attendance strategies so that barriers to attendance are removed and absence levels reduce.  Some pupils are not confident that staff address derogatory language and unkind

p.4

4

behaviour effectively. This impacts negatively on their views of the school. The school should ensure that it strengthens how it tackles unkind behaviour and derogatory language so that pupils’ experiences across the school are more positive.  The school does not ensure that Year 8 and 9 pupils receive sufficient encounters with organisations and employers. As a result, these pupils are not informed about possible career choices as well as they should be. The school should ensure that suitable careers guidance and learning opportunities are designed for younger pupils so that they are better informed about their next stage in education and future employment.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 15 and 16 July 2025

p.4

School details

Local authority Cheshire West and Chester

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1023

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 11 July 2024, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Halliard Multi-Academy Trust.  The current principal was appointed in September 2024.  There have been substantial changes to the staffing and governance of the school since it was last inspected. This includes the appointment of the principal, vice principal, various subject leaders, a secondary director of education and an interim executive governing board.  The school uses three registered alternative provisions and one unregistered alternative provision for a small number of pupils.  The school does not meet the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 15 and 16 July 2025

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  The inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken this into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the principal, senior leaders and subject leaders. Inspectors met with a range of other staff and leaders during the inspection.  Inspectors spoke with representatives of the interim executive board and the board of trustees. Inspectors also spoke with the CEO of the trust, a representative of the local authority and the providers of the alternative provision.  The inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour across the school, including at social times.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in the following subjects: English, science, mathematics, physical education, geography and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive, they held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons,

p.6

Information about this inspection

spoke to staff, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with subject leaders and looked at pupils’ work in some other subjects.  Inspectors spoke with the leaders responsible for pupils’ personal development, behaviour and attendance, alternative provision, careers, the provision for pupils with SEND and reading.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation and records relating to pupils’ attendance and behaviour.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspectors considered the responses of parents and carers to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s

p.6

Information about this inspection

online surveys for staff and pupils. 15 and 16 July 2025

p.6

Inspection team

Amina Modan, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Liz Kelly Ofsted Inspector 15 and 16 July 2025

p.7

8

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion