Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Griffiths, Tammie
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Sept 2025
- Inspectors verified
Emma Curry
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY456616
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“The language the childminder uses is warm and engaging for children.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 951
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children do not receive a good level of education to help them progress well in their learning. They play with the limited resources on offer, but are not supported to practise skills or build on their existing abilities. This is because the childminder does not ensure that children benefit from effective adult interactions. Furthermore, the childminder does not have an effective key-person system in place for her or any assistants who work with her to meet children's care and learning needs. The childminder does not use assessments to identify any gaps in children's learning. Consequently, children do not receive the support they need to thrive and develop. The childminder has not ensured that all adults who work with children have been suitably vetted. However, although this is a breach of requirements, it does not significantly impact children's well-being because they are never left alone with these individuals.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not focus well enough on gathering relevant information about children when they start with her. This does not support her to ensure that she is able to respond to meet their individual care needs. Children benefit from eating nutritious snacks but, during snack times, babies are not provided with appropriate seating when eating. This does not fully promote their good health.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
When babies voluntarily complete tasks on their own, they receive praise from the childminder, who also claps her hands to reward their achievements. Older children follow their interests to collect and sort balls into different colours, showing their mathematical skills.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder does not plan a curriculum effectively to help children develop in their learning. She does not have a good enough understanding of how children learn to be able to provide them with a good level of education. For example, she follows children's lead in their play, however, she does not plan to sequence their learning. Children select toys and resources to promote their interests, but when they use these resources, the childminder does not interact with them to support their development. n The childminder does not provide the necessary coaching and mentoring to any assistants that she employs. She does not ensure that they have the skills and knowledge to promote children's care and learning. For example, while adults provide comfort and supervise children, they do not help them to engage in learning to build on their skills and knowledge. The childminder does not understand the valuable role of a key person and does not ensure that children
p.2
need to do better?
benefit from being linked to an adult who is able to take the lead in supporting their learning and emotional well-being. This means that the childminder is not
p.2
need to do better?
19 September 2025 providing activities to follow children's interests or to build on what they already know. Furthermore, parents are not aware of the adult responsible for providing tailored care and learning for their children. n The required progress checks for children between the ages of two and three years are not being completed. The childminder is aware of this requirement but has not put this in place for children in her care. This means parents, carers, health visitors and other professionals are not fully informed about either the progress children are making or possible gaps in their development. This does not ensure that children receive the support they need to reach their full potential. n The childminder does not ensure that she has gathered all the relevant information, such as children's dietary requirements. This means that she does not have the information she needs to meet children's individual care and
p.2
need to do better?
learning needs when they first start. Furthermore, the childminder does not offer appropriate seating for babies when they eat. This does not promote children's good health. n The childminder has not provided Ofsted with the information needed to complete the required checks on all adults living or working on the premises. Therefore, suitability checks have not been completed to ensure that all assistants are suitable to work with children. However, these individuals are not left alone with children and so, to date, there has been no significant impact on children's safety or well-being. n The language the childminder uses is warm and engaging for children. She sings a range of nursery rhymes and action songs. Children respond well to this, helping to promote their communication and physical skills. The childminder makes use of visits to a local soft-play centre to extend children's learning. She plays games with them, and children learn about spatial awareness and concepts
p.3
need to do better?
such as time. n At snack time, the childminder talks to older children about oral health. For example, she uses pretend teeth to show children how to chomp down on their food. Children are confident to discuss their 'strong' teeth.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
19 September 2025 ensure that Ofsted is provided with the information needed for necessary suitability checks to take place, in a timely manner 24/10/2025
p.3
Due date
ensure that babies are seated appropriately when eating 24/10/2025
p.4
Due date
implement effective arrangements to ensure that children benefit from the focused support of a key person who takes the lead in tailoring the care and education they receive 31/10/2025
p.4
Due date
implement effective coaching and mentoring for any assistants to raise the quality of their interactions and support for children's learning 17/10/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure that important information is obtained to meet children's individual needs 31/10/2025
p.4
Due date
plan and implement an ambitious curriculum that is fully understood by all assistants and that is tailored to reflect children's individual needs 31/10/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure that the progress check for all children between the ages of two and three years is carried out to inform parents and other professionals about progress or potential gaps in children's development. 31/10/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY456616 Local authority Lincolnshire Inspection number 10398297 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 3 Date of previous inspection 14 October 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2013 and lives in Alford. She operates term time only, from 7am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 3.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The childminder and the inspector completed a learning walk and discussed how the curriculum supports the children's learning. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact that this is having on the children's learning. n The inspector carried out a joint observation of a planned activity with the childminder. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request. n The inspector spoke to parents during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.5
Inspection activities
19 September 2025 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
19 September 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion