Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Phoenix Children’s Homes Limited in Plymouth

Inspected 10 Sept 2025 · published 22 Oct 2025 · URN 2604092

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Phoenix Childcare Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Sept 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Nickie Doney

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    2604092

  • URN verified

    2604092

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveclearstronglypositivetrusting relationshipsconfidentsafe
Criticismconcernslackrequires improvementnot alwaysnot consistentlyconcerndelayedlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1344w−7
  • What needs to improve511w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,829
longer than usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 60, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%What needs to improve 23%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 1 Registered provider: Phoenix Childcare Ltd

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This home is owned by a private provider. It can provide care for up to two children who may experience emotional or social difficulties. At the time of inspection, one child was living at the home.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The registered manager is currently on maternity leave. The acting manager has applied to register with Ofsted.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

Staff in the home are referred to as adults. This is reflected in this report.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

16/07/2024 Full Good 21/06/2023 Full Requires improvement to be good 28/06/2022 Full Good 09/11/2021 Full Inadequate Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 3

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Three children have moved on from the home and two children have moved into the home since the previous inspection. Three children’s placements have ended unexpectedly. Leaders and managers recognised that they could not meet their needs.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child currently living at the home is starting to build trusting relationships with the team. It is clear that the child wants to spend time with the adults and is starting to express their feelings to them. The child rated their home as ‘nearly a 10 out of 10’ and did not have any suggestions for improvements. Adults have worked hard to help the child to express themselves and understand how the child is feeling. For example, the adults know how the child is feeling by the choice of music they play. This helps the child to express themselves without having to use words.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

All the children have had their education disrupted. The home has challenged decisions about the children’s education and advocated strongly for them. The child living at the home continued their education over the summer holidays with tutoring. The home provided educational activities to support them to feel more confident. A formal complaint was made for another child in relation to their education. When children have been out of education, adults have offered children educational activities.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children’s experiences of moving into the home have been mixed. For one child, planning did not consider the adults’ skill sets to meet the child’s needs. The learning from one child was that the team had struggled with physical interventions. Prior to the next child moving in, managers identified that the team had experience in this area. However, the team did not have the expertise to support the second child effectively. Changes have been made to admissions processes, planning for the child currently living in the home was more detailed and considered. There was a clearer alignment between the child’s needs and’ skills of the team.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children’s health needs are carefully managed and understood. Specific training from medical professionals took place before the child currently living in the home moved in. This increased the adults’ confidence in managing the child’s health needs.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children have fun-filled days, with activities being planned for them. A memory book for the child captures their experiences well.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The home environment is much like a family home. There are some aspects of the home which are outdated but it has a family feel. It is encouraging to see the child putting their own stamp on the home and photos displayed around the home to celebrate the child. Window restrictors are in place with no assessed need. This detracts from the otherwise homely feel.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 4 The adults understand risks to the children well. Guidance to the team is clear about the risks and adults know the processes to follow. Adults have close working relationships with the key professionals in the children’s lives. This helps the adults to understand risks more and how to help keep children safe.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Plans for when children go missing from the home are clear. Train times to possible locations are provided so adults would know how to check this. One child, who has moved on from the home, was repeatedly missing from the home. The team’s response to these incidents was considered and nurturing. For example, adults took the child fresh clothes and checked in with them regularly. All professionals were notified quickly and agencies worked together. The team was quick to search for the child and notify train and coach stations in efforts to find them. Return home conversations were requested in line with statutory guidance. An independent person spoke to the child about their reasons for leaving the home.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Positive behaviours are promoted. The team has attempted to establish consistent boundaries. This has not always worked, and, at times, a lack of consistency has led to incidents increasing.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Restraint has been used for two of the children who previously lived in the home, and, at high levels of frequency. The high number of restraints was due to the team’s inability to manage behaviour without these. The recordings of the restraints are highly detailed. Each incident is reviewed by the manager. There is a focus on understanding why the child may have acted or behaved in a certain way. However, there is a lack of management review of what adults could have done differently. Adults have struggled; on occasions, they did not restrain the child correctly, meaning that adults were harmed as a result.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff have completed repeated restraint training, although managers have not addressed poor practice sufficiently. For example, adults speak to children after restraints and the conversations are sensitive. Sometimes these conversations have been undertaken by a person directly involved in the incident. At other times, the conversations have been delayed. This has meant important opportunities for learning have been lost. When concerns have been raised about adults’ practice, these have been reported quickly. However, internal investigations do not outline the actions needed for practice to improve. Children are supported to understand the outcomes of the concerns raised and there is an emphasis on repairing relationships.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Adults understand one child’s health needs well and how to support their medication. The home environment is safe for this child.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Safer recruitment processes are in place. This means that leaders can make safer decisions about who is employed in the home.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 5 There have been recent changes of manager. The registered manager is on maternity leave, and a new manager has joined and has applied to register with Ofsted. Managers know the children well. The acting manager has a good relationship with the child in the home. They have high aspirations for the child and have advocated strongly on their behalf.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

The main concerns relate to the children who have had to move on from the home. Managers were quick to act when the home could not meet these children’s needs. There has been learning from this, but managers have not clearly addressed the practice concerns. This limits the improvements the team can make. The team has been unstable until recently. The child currently living in the home is experiencing a more stable and cohesive team.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Leaders and managers have not reviewed care effectively. Patterns and trends of incidents are not identified. There is little consideration as to when incidents have occurred, the time of day or whether the same adult is involved, for example. This lack of review means concerns are not addressed. Improvements to the care the children have received were not made. Records of individual incidents indicate that adults have struggled but do not detail what is needed to improve. Some training has been put in place, but this is limited.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Senior leaders did act quickly when one child was not receiving the level of care needed. Support was put into place to move the child on from the home quickly. Changes have been made, with admissions processes being more thorough as a result.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Adults currently feel supported, and supervision takes place regularly. Team meetings and reflective sessions offer opportunities to consider the children’s needs. Professionals speak highly of the good communication they receive.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Practice has not consistently reflected that set out in the home’s statement of purpose. Reviews of this document need to clarify the purpose of care and arrangements for staffing. Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 6

p.5

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—

p.6

Requirement Due date

helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—

p.6

Requirement Due date

understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(f))

p.6

Requirement Due date

This means that leaders and managers should review incidents and care effectively. When shortfalls are identified, actions must be put in place to address practice and improve care. 14 November 2025

p.6

Requirement Due date

The care planning standard is that children—

p.6

Requirement Due date

receive effectively planned care in or through the children’s home; and

p.6

Requirement Due date

have a positive experience of arriving at or moving on from the home.

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—

p.6

Requirement Due date

that children are admitted to the home only if their needs are within the range of needs of children for whom it is intended that the home is to provide care and accommodation, as set out in the home’s statement of purpose. 14 November 2025 Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 7 (Regulation 14 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a))

p.6

Requirement Due date

This means that clear and robust processes are in place for children moving into the home. The registered person must ensure that the team has the skills, experience and expertise to meet the needs of each child.

p.7

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that the reasons for any restrictions or monitoring in the home environment are recorded clearly. In particular, window restrictors should only be used where there is an assessed need. Timescales and mechanisms for review should be specified and children’s individual views on these measures should be recorded. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 3.10)  The registered person should ensure that incidents of restraint are reviewed to identify effective practice and respond promptly where any issues or trends of concern emerge. The review should provide the opportunity for amending practice to ensure it meets the needs of every child. Consideration should be given as to the best placed person to discuss the restraint with the child after the event. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 49, paragraph 9.59)

p.7

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that the statement of purpose is child focused and indicates how the home provides individualised care for each child. It should be kept up to date and reflect the staffing levels actually being provided. Updates should be sent to Ofsted within 28 days of review. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 14, paragraph 3.5)

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Phoenix Childcare Ltd

p.8

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Support Hub Unit 5 Chinon Court, Lower Moor Way, Tiverton Devon EX16 6SS

p.8

Inspector

Nickie Doney, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2604092 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion