Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Sept 2025
- Inspectors verified
Anne Dyoss
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
2725795
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- improve risk assessment arrangements so that all hazards are identified and managed effectively, ensuring every adult in the setting understands and carries out their responsibilities consistently so that children are kept safe 30/09/2025 p.4
- Overall, they enjoy role play, outdoor activities and are eager to join in conversations. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- These unsafe arrangements compromise children's welfare and put them at risk of injury. p.2
- These unsafe practices expose children to hazards and put their health and safety at risk. p.2
- Safeguarding practice is weak and risk assessment is not effective. p.2
- This means children are exposed to potential hazards in the home and through daily routines, such as the unsafe storage of cleaning products and unsuitable sleeping arrangements. p.2
- Weaknesses in the childminder's everyday practice reduce children's safety and limit the quality of their experiences. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“Safeguarding practice is weak and risk assessment is not effective.” p.2Communication & language4
“This lack of communication reduces continuity in children's care and learning.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,043
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not applicable
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not make sure that children are always kept safe. Safeguarding practice is weak and risk assessment is not effective. This means children are exposed to potential hazards in the home and through daily routines, such as the unsafe storage of cleaning products and unsuitable sleeping arrangements. The childminder does not promote effective partnership working with parents consistently, which has a negative impact on the continuity of care and children's learning. Weaknesses in the childminder's everyday practice reduce children's safety and limit the quality of their experiences.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children develop close relationships with the childminder and show that they feel comfortable in her care. Overall, they enjoy role play, outdoor activities and are eager to join in conversations. However, the childminder does not plan or sequence the curriculum well enough to help children build their knowledge and skills securely. She does not plan the learning environment effectively to provide varied play opportunities. The childminder's planning of children's learning lacks structure and depth, which limits the progress that children can make.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children respond to the childminder's shared expectations. They understand simple rules, such as taking their shoes off indoors, and they follow these consistently. The childminder encourages children to share and take turns, and, overall, they play together positively. Children develop their social skills and an awareness of others.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder does not evaluate her practice effectively. She has not identified breaches of statutory requirements. This lack of self-reflection prevents her from making the necessary improvements to safeguard children and provide a good quality of education. She fails to check that other adults working with her understand their roles and responsibilities. Important weaknesses go unchallenged, and children's safety is not prioritised. n The childminder does not carry out effective risk assessment. She allows adults to drink hot drinks while standing in a doorway where children play. She has not identified the risk of household cleaning products stored in an unlocked cupboard in the kitchen, where children play. These unsafe practices expose children to hazards and put their health and safety at risk. n The childminder does not follow safe sleep practice. She allows adults to climb into travel cots with children. This creates manual handling risks and the
p.2
need to do better?
potential for injury to both the adult and the child. At the same time, other children rest on mats on the floor beside the cot. These unsafe arrangements compromise children's welfare and put them at risk of injury. n The childminder does not gather and record all the essential information she
p.2
need to do better?
2 September 2025 must have about every child. She does not keep documents that show children's full details, including their home address. This means children's welfare is not assured in the event of an emergency. n The childminder shares daily information with parents about routines and children's daily experiences. However, she does not gather enough detail from parents to establish accurate starting points for children's learning. When children also attend another setting, the childminder does not obtain sufficient information about their learning priorities. This lack of communication reduces continuity in children's care and learning. n While the childminder provides playful interactions that children enjoy, she does not show a secure understanding of child development or how to plan a sequenced curriculum. Children's learning is not matched to what they need to know and do next, which reduces the progress they make.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder knows what children enjoy in their play and uses this to choose some activities. However, she does not use assessment effectively to plan learning that matches children's age and stage of development. For example, she sets priorities, such as pencil control, recognising numbers and shapes, or name writing for children under the age of two. These unrealistic expectations mean children are not supported to build the right skills at the right time. n The childminder does not provide enough support for children who speak English as an additional language. She has not taken reasonable steps to understand or build on children's home languages in her teaching. The childminder does not provide effective support to all children to communicate, feel included and develop a strong sense of belonging. This reduces their ability to express themselves confidently and engage in their learning. n The childminder does not plan the learning environment effectively. Indoor space
p.3
need to do better?
is cramped, and resources are not organised to provide a wide range of purposeful play opportunities. For example, the childminder uses a tent as a play resource but does not have a clear purpose or any additional resources readily available for children to use. Children play inside, squealing excitedly rather than engaging in meaningful learning. The environment does not reflect all areas of learning, and children's experiences are narrowed when they move indoors. This reduces the quality of their play and learning and limits how well they engage in purposeful play. n The childminder encourages children to develop independence in self-care routines. She supports them to wash their hands, manage their lunch boxes and practise dressing themselves. This helps children build confidence in looking after their own needs.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
improve risk assessment arrangements so that all hazards are identified and managed effectively, ensuring every adult in the setting understands and carries out their responsibilities consistently so that children are kept safe 30/09/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure safe sleep practice is followed at all times so children are not placed at risk 30/09/2025
p.4
Due date
gather and record all required information for every child, including their home address, so records are complete and can be used in the event of an emergency 30/09/2025
p.4
Due date
promote effective partnership working with parents and other settings to establish accurate starting points and share information about children's learning 30/09/2025
p.4
Due date
develop and implement a sequenced curriculum that is based on secure knowledge of child development and builds children's learning step by step 30/10/2025
p.4
Due date
use assessment effectively to set learning priorities that reflect children's age and stage of development 30/10/2025
p.4
Due date
improve the planning of the learning environment so it reflects all areas of learning and provides sufficient space and varied opportunities for purposeful play and engagement 30/10/2025
p.4
Due date
2 September 2025 improve support for children who speak English as an additional language to strengthen their communication, engagement and sense of belonging. 30/10/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 2725795 Local authority Birmingham Inspection number 10399914 Type of provision Childminder
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.6
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4 Date of previous inspection Not applicable
p.6
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2023 and lives in Birmingham. She operates all year round, from Monday to Friday, 7.30am to 5.30pm, except for family holidays and bank holidays. The childminder holds an approved early years qualification and works with an assistant and a co-childminder. She provides funded early education places for all eligible children.
p.6
Inspection activities
n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises her early years provision, including the aims and rationale for her curriculum. n The children interacted with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this is having on the children's learning. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.6
Inspection activities
2 September 2025 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
2 September 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion