Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Sept 2025
- Inspectors verified
Nicola Houston
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY243475
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although the childminder does recognise some indications that a child may be at risk of harm, she does not know who to report any concerns she may have about a child to. p.2
- She has a poor understanding of safeguarding concerns, such as the 'Prevent' duty. p.2
- childminder's assessment of children's learning is poor and she does not know what she wants children to learn next. p.2
- The childminder does not demonstrate a robust understanding of child protection issues or how to address safeguarding concerns appropriately. p.2
- The childminder's knowledge of safer eating is weak. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 732
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not demonstrate a robust understanding of child protection issues or how to address safeguarding concerns appropriately. This means children's safety is not assured. Children do not benefit from a broad or well- sequenced curriculum. This is because the childminder's understanding of what children need to learn is weak. As a result, children are not prepared with the knowledge they need for the next stage of their education. Despite this, children are happy and settled in the childminder's home. Children are welcoming and polite to visitors. They joyfully greet them and show them their toys.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Although children generally behave well, they do not regularly receive messages that support positive behaviour. The childminder does have rules in place that she wants children to learn. However, these are not delivered consistently or clearly explained. This means that children do not understand what is expected of them.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder prepares activities to keep children busy. For example, children enjoy puzzles. Older children complete them with ease and wait for younger children to finish. Although children enjoy these activities for short periods, the childminder does not link them to children's stage of learning or build on what they know and can do. This means that children do not benefit from purposeful learning experiences.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder does not keep her safeguarding knowledge up to date. She has a poor understanding of safeguarding concerns, such as the 'Prevent' duty. Although the childminder does recognise some indications that a child may be at risk of harm, she does not know who to report any concerns she may have about a child to. This affects her ability to keep children safe. n The childminder's knowledge of safer eating is weak. She does not recognise good practices that support children to eat safely. For example, she leaves children unsupervised when they are eating at the table while she is in another room. Although she is nearby, children are not consistently within sight and hearing while consuming food. This compromises children's safety and welfare. n Children do not benefit from a well-designed curriculum that builds securely on what they know so that they experience good learning opportunities. The
p.2
need to do better?
childminder's assessment of children's learning is poor and she does not know what she wants children to learn next. Furthermore, the childminder does not understand how to complete the progress check at age two. This means that there is no system in place to ensure mandatory assessments are carried out. n The childminder does not manage children's behaviour appropriately. For example, she tells children they cannot play with the large box of toy cars that
p.2
need to do better?
9 September 2025 others are playing with, but does not provide a reason for this. This means that children are unclear why certain rules are in place. Furthermore, when children are toilet training, the childminder occasionally reacts in negative terms when they have accidents and does not consider their emotional well-being as they learn a new skill. n The childminder is unclear on the notifications she must make to Ofsted. For example, she failed to notify Ofsted about a significant event that impacted her ability to care for children for a period of time. However, to date, there has not been any impact on children. n Children enjoy indoor games that support some physical skills. For example, the childminder throws beanbags to children. They also enjoy rolling balls to knock over skittles. Furthermore, children enjoy playing in the garden. They climb and balance on different equipment as they play. n Children learn to do some tasks for themselves. For instance, they put their
p.2
need to do better?
shoes on independently. However, the childminder does not encourage children to carry out simple care routines, such as washing their hands before eating. This means that children do not receive regular messages to promote their understanding of good health and personal hygiene.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
ensure children are always within sight and hearing when eating 10/10/2025
p.3
Due date
complete safeguarding training to ensure knowledge is up to date and in line with requirements 10/10/2025
p.3
Due date
ensure children's behaviour is managed appropriately. 10/10/2025
p.3
Due date
develop and implement a curriculum that clearly identifies what individual children need to learn and offers appropriate challenge to help them make good progress 24/10/2025
p.4
Due date
strengthen knowledge of the progress check at age two to ensure mandatory assessments are routinely carried out. 24/10/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY243475 Local authority Portsmouth Inspection number 10407397 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 3 Date of previous inspection 8 January 2020
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2003 and lives in Portsmouth, Hampshire. She operates all year round from 7.30am to 7pm, Monday to Friday, except for family holidays. The childminder provides funded early education for eligible children between the ages of two years old and five years old.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The inspector spoke to the childminder and discussed what they want children to learn. n The childminder showed the inspector the premises and discussed how they were safe and suitable. n The inspector observed interactions between children and the childminder. n Parents shared their written views of the childminder with the inspector. n The inspector viewed a sample of documentation.
p.5
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
9 September 2025 9 September 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion