Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Rawmarsh Rosehill Junior School

Inspected 9 Jul 2025 · URN 106875

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dan McKeating (lead), Andrew Gibbins

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Jul 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Andrew Gibbins, Dan McKeating

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    S62 5QH

  • Name on report verified

    Rawmarsh Rosehill Junior School

  • URN verified

    106875

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 11% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouseffectivehigh expectationssuccessfulsafeenjoyproudhappy
Criticismconcernsnot good enoughnot effectivenot alwaysvariationinconsistencieslacknot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1229w+10
  • Safeguarding69w+14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,262
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 4%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Rawmarsh Rosehill Junior School Kilnhurst Road, Rawmarsh, Rotherham, South Yorkshire S62 5QH

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 8 and 9 July 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy learning at Rosehill Junior School. They are proud of their school and happy to attend. Staff have high expectations of pupils’ achievement. Classrooms are productive places where there is a hive of activity. Staff support pupils closely. As a result, pupils achieve well. This includes in national tests at the end of key stage 2.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is calm and orderly. At play time, pupils socialise well. For example, they play sports such as basketball and football cooperatively. In lessons, pupils follow instructions. The school’s clear routines are well-embedded. Pupils trust the staff and feel safe. They have adults in school whom they can report concerns to. Pupils can use the ‘worry monsters’ in classrooms to share their concerns in writing. Pupils have confidence that staff will resolve any worries they have.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There are well-considered opportunities for pupils to pursue their interests. These include taking part in clubs. For example, there are clubs for performing arts, sports and crafts. The school promotes pupils’ understanding of equality effectively. Pupils celebrate their individuality in singing assemblies and through the personal development programme.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

While there have been improvements made to the quality of education, some other aspects of the school’s work are not as effective as they need to be.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

There are several strengths to many aspects of the school’s work. However, leaders have made limited progress in some of the specific areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. For example, the governing body is not as effective as it needs to be. Although governors are ambitious for the school, they have not challenged and supported the school as well as they should. The school provides governors with detailed information about the school. However, this is not always shared with governors in a timely way. This is limiting how well governors can fulfil their duties.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Parents and carers have mixed views about the school. Many are positive. They value that class teachers ‘go above and beyond’ to ensure their children are supported. A significant minority of parents do not feel listened to by the school. They are frustrated by the communication with leaders, especially when they have concerns. This means that relationships between the school and some parents are not as positive as they should be.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Much of the school’s work to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is successful. There is an effective process to identify pupils’ needs. Teachers make careful adaptations to teaching to ensure that pupils with SEND access the curriculum and achieve well. However, the school does not check closely enough the consistency of the reviews for pupils with SEND. There is variation in the quality of the school’s contribution to these and in how well the school communicates information to parents. 8 and 9 July 2025

p.2

3

The school’s curriculum is broad and ambitious. It is thought out in a logical order. In some subjects, the essential knowledge that pupils should learn is not identified precisely. This affects the clarity of what knowledge staff teach and when. In these subjects, there is some variation in what essential information pupils know and remember.

p.3

3

Teachers have secure subject knowledge. They provide activities that help pupils to learn and remember the curriculum carefully. For example, in geography, pupils create models of rainforests that teachers use in their explanations of deforestation. In mathematics, lessons begin with arithmetic to ensure pupils have secured the knowledge they need to complete problem-solving activities.

p.3

3

The school’s effective checks on pupils’ knowledge of phonics and reading ensure that it quickly identifies those pupils who need additional support. The ways that it helps pupils to catch up with their reading are successful. The school ensures that pupils read increasingly ambitious books to help broaden their knowledge of important words. Pupils use their reading knowledge to understand aspects of key texts such as an author’s intended meaning. The school promotes reading for pleasure by encouraging pupils’ frequent use of its well-stocked and inviting library. However, there are some inconsistencies in the ways the school is ensuring pupils read widely and independently beyond the classroom.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well. They are kind and courteous. The school monitors attendance closely and puts effective support in place when concerns arise. Rates of attendance are high.

p.3

3

The school prepares pupils for life in modern Britain appropriately. Pupils are passionate about the fact that everyone should be treated equally and fairly. Pupils have a secure understanding of fundamental British values such as democracy and the rule of law. Residential trips support pupils to develop their independence, resilience and teamwork skills.

p.3

3

The school prioritises staff workload and well-being sufficiently. Most staff appreciate this.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The school keeps pupils safe and takes appropriate actions to do so. Staff know the community well and the potential risks that pupils face. They have an assured understanding of how to report their concerns. Some internal records do not currently capture and reflect all the actions that the school has taken to keep children safe, or the wider communications with other professionals.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The governing body does not hold school leaders to account sufficiently well. This 8 and 9 July 2025

p.3

4

hinders some important aspects of school life, including actions to enhance the school’s relations with some parents. The school should strengthen its governance arrangements to ensure that the governing body works consistently and robustly to challenge and support school leaders.  Some parents and carers lack confidence in aspects of the school’s work, as they feel communication is not good enough, especially when they raise concerns. This leaves some parents feeling dissatisfied and, in some cases, others feeling ill-informed about how the school is meeting their child’s SEND needs. The school should improve its partnership with parents. It should be consistent in the way it reviews with parents the support in place for pupils with SEND.  In some foundation subjects, the school has not identified the core knowledge and skills that pupils should learn with enough precision. This means there is some variation

p.4

4

in teaching and what pupils know and remember in these subjects. The school should ensure that the curriculum is well thought out in all subjects and that pupils are supported to learn essential information well.  Some of the school’s safeguarding records do not reflect all the actions that it takes to keep pupils safe, or its communications with other professionals. As a result, the school is not consistently able to review some of its actions and their impact. The school should ensure that all safeguarding records are sufficiently detailed about the actions that it takes and the wider communications to keep pupils safe.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 8 and 9 July 2025

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 20 and 21 September 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this school

 The school uses one registered alternative provision.  The school runs its own breakfast club.  Inspectors were aware during this inspection that complaints of a safeguarding nature were being investigated by the appropriate authorities. While Ofsted does not have the power to investigate complaints of this kind, actions taken by the school in response to the complaints were considered alongside the other evidence available at the time of the inspection to inform inspector’s judgements.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 8 and 9 July 2025

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with various leaders from the school. The lead inspector met with members of the governing body. Inspectors reviewed documentation relating to governance, including minutes from governor meetings.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, including reading, mathematics and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central

p.6

6

record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors met with groups of pupils during the inspection and spoke with them at social times and in lessons.  Inspectors met with groups of staff during the inspection and spoke with them throughout the inspection. Inspectors also considered the opinions expressed through the Ofsted staff survey.  The lead inspector took account of responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free- text responses.

p.6

Inspection team

Dan McKeating, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Andrew Gibbins His Majesty’s Inspector 8 and 9 July 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion