Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Sherlock Healthcare Services Ltd in Birmingham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Sherlock Healthcare Services Ltd
- Inspection date verified
2 Jul 2025
- Inspectors verified
Becky Rutter
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Name on report verified
1231458
- URN verified
1231458
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementInadequate
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When damage occurs as a result of incidents, staff respond promptly by engaging the Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 4 maintenance team to carry out repairs, ensuring the environment remains safe and well maintained. p.3
- However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- For example, serious incidents involving children have not always been notified to Ofsted, or have been reported outside the required time frames. p.4
- The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate p.1
- Recruitment procedures do not consistently explore gaps in employment history, dates of employment and concerns about previous roles. p.4
- Despite this, management oversight of these incidents is not sufficiently robust. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 1,638
- about usual (typical 1899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 1 Registered provider: Sherlock Healthcare Services Ltd
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is operated by a private organisation. The home provides care for up to three children who have social and emotional difficulties. There were three children living at the home at the time of the inspection.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
16/04/2024 Full Good 16/08/2023 Full Requires improvement to be good 07/12/2022 Full Good 10/01/2022 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 3
p.2
improvement to be good
There has been no registered manager at the home since July 2023. Even though the provider has made several attempts to appoint people, they have not stayed. The lack of stable leadership is reflected in the length of time the home has been without a permanent, suitably experienced and qualified registered manager. This has therefore impacted on the judgements at this home.
p.3
improvement to be good
Since the last inspection, four children have moved into the home and three have moved out. The quality of children’s experiences during these transitions has varied. One child benefited from a planned and supported move into semi-independent living, which reflected good practice. In contrast, another child experienced a rapid admission to the home, despite there being sufficient time to facilitate a more gradual and child-centred transition. This inconsistency highlights a need for improved planning and coordination around admissions.
p.3
improvement to be good
Children are supported to develop positive relationships with staff. For one child, this progress has been particularly evident. Initially, the child found it difficult to maintain eye contact and engage socially. However, during the inspection, they were observed seeking out staff company, initiating conversations, and expressing interest in shared activities, such as swimming. This demonstrates the nurturing approach of staff and the child’s growing sense of trust and emotional security.
p.3
improvement to be good
Preparation for independence is not consistently effective for one child whose independent reviewing officer raised that the placement had not been able to work with the child meaningfully in planning for independence. The child has experienced uncertainty regarding their future plans, which has contributed to feelings of instability. Although staff have, at times, advocated for children when services have not been provided, this has not been consistent. For example, one child approaching independence had not been allocated a personal adviser, and staff did not escalate this omission with the placing authority. Consequently, the child missed an opportunity to access support that could have eased their transition into adulthood.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff promote children’s engagement with education. One child has made notable progress from their starting point, reflecting the positive impact of staff support. Another child has recently completed their GCSEs and is being encouraged to explore post-16 education and training options. These examples illustrate staff commitment to supporting children’s educational achievement and aspirations.
p.3
improvement to be good
The home provides a welcoming and comfortable environment. There are designated areas for children to play and relax, contributing to a homely atmosphere. While some maintenance tasks are required, these do not pose any safeguarding risks. When damage occurs as a result of incidents, staff respond promptly by engaging the Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 4 maintenance team to carry out repairs, ensuring the environment remains safe and well maintained.
p.3
improvement to be good
When children go missing, staff take appropriate action to locate them and notify relevant safeguarding agencies in a timely manner. However, the recording of missing incidents is sometimes delayed. This undermines the effectiveness of monitoring and review processes.
p.4
improvement to be good
Physical restraint is used only when necessary and proportionate. Incidents are recorded appropriately, and both children and staff are offered debriefs in a timely manner. Despite this, management oversight of these incidents is not sufficiently robust. Staff debriefs have been conducted by individuals who do not hold the appropriate qualifications, which compromises the integrity of post-incident review and reflective practice.
p.4
improvement to be good
Children are supported to take age-appropriate risks in line with their developmental stage. Individualised plans for free time and internet access are tailored to each child’s assessed needs and risks. Behaviour support plans are personalised and include specific strategies to help staff engage children effectively. For example, one child responds positively to music and is calmed by listening to particular songs. However, the use of door alarms or other surveillance mechanisms require review to ensure they reflect each child’s individual risk assessment and care plan.
p.4
improvement to be good
There is no centralised system for recording key information, which limits staff’s ability to access important data and documentation efficiently. During the inspection, staff were unable to provide a complete record of medication errors and complaints since the last inspection. This lack of accessible information hinders effective monitoring and evaluation of practice.
p.4
improvement to be good
Recruitment procedures do not consistently explore gaps in employment history, dates of employment and concerns about previous roles. This does not provide a clear history and rationale about potential applicants.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
The home has not had a registered manager in post since the last inspection. Although a manager was appointed, they left the role within a few months. A new manager commenced during the inspection and demonstrates enthusiasm and commitment to the role. However, they have no prior experience of working in residential children’s homes and do not yet hold the required qualification. As a result, leadership of the home remains vulnerable, and the capacity to drive improvement is limited. Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 5 Monitoring systems are in place but have not been used effectively due to the absence of a registered manager. This has weakened leaders’ oversight and contributed to missed opportunities to identify shortfalls and implement timely improvements. For example, serious incidents involving children have not always been notified to Ofsted, or have been reported outside the required time frames. This undermines regulatory compliance
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Leaders demonstrate care and concern for both children and staff. When the home has experienced significant changes, the emotional impact has been acknowledged. For instance, following the departure of the previous manager, the responsible individual facilitated a team meeting where staff were encouraged to share their feelings. This response showed sensitivity to the disruption and distress caused.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Feedback from family members is positive. Parents report that staff keep them well informed about their child’s activities and emotional well-being, which helps to build trust and maintain strong relationships.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Staff receive regular training to enhance their knowledge and skills. Opportunities for team consultation with a clinical psychologist provide valuable space for reflection and support staff in understanding and responding to children’s behaviours. This contributes to a thoughtful and therapeutic approach to care. Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 6
p.5
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if—
p.6
Requirement Due date
an incident requiring police involvement occurs in relation to a child which the registered person considers to be serious; or
p.6
Requirement Due date
there is any other incident relating to a child which the registered person considers to be serious. (Regulation 40 (4)(b)(e)) 31 August 2025
p.6
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.6
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.6
Requirement Due date
lead and manage the home in a way that is consistent with the approach and ethos, and delivers the outcomes, set out in the home’s statement of purpose;
p.6
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home.
p.6
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a)(c)(f)(h)) 31 August 2025 Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 7 In particular, the registered person must ensure that they challenge the placing authority when care planning for children falls below the expected standard; the system of recording in the home is effective; recruitment practice is safe and that where an applicant has failed probation in their previous role working with vulnerable persons or where an applicant has gaps in their previous employment, this is sufficiently explored; monitoring systems are implemented to provide effective oversight of the home; and the use of door alarms on children’s bedrooms is proportionate.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must recruit staff using recruitment procedures that are designed to ensure children’s safety.
p.7
Requirement Due date
employ an individual to work at the children’s home; or
p.7
Requirement Due date
if an individual is employed by a person other than the registered person to work at the home in a position in which the individual may have regular contact with children, allow that individual to work at the home, if the individual satisfies the requirements in paragraph (3).
p.7
Requirement Due date
the individual is of integrity and good character;
p.7
Requirement Due date
the individual has the appropriate experience, qualification and skills for the work that the individual is to perform;
p.7
Requirement Due date
the individual is mentally and physically fit for the purposes of the work that the individual is to perform; and
p.7
Requirement Due date
full and satisfactory information is available in relation to the individual in respect of each of the matters in Schedule 2. (Regulation 32 (1) (2)(a)(b) (3)(a)(b)(c)(d))
p.7
Requirement Due date
In particular, the registered person must demonstrate that individuals working in the home and undertaking managerial responsibilities, such as reviewing missing incident records and undertaking staff debriefs following physical restraint, is appropriately qualified to do so. 31 August 2025 Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 8
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 9
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Sherlock Healthcare Services Ltd
p.9
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Suite LP38724, 20–22 Wenlock Road, London N1 7GU
p.9
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Hilton Mutariswa
p.9
Inspector
Becky Rutter, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 1231458 10 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.9
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspector
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion