Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Casterton Care Group Limited in Lancashire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Casterton Care Group Limited
- Inspection date verified
6 Aug 2025
- Inspectors verified
Kitty Wiper
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2722566
- URN verified
2722566
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This relates specifically to the registered person ensuring that physical intervention records are clear and accurate with clear oversight of any intervention used. p.5
- Furthermore, this relates to the registered person ensuring that staff have been spoken to within the specified timescale about the use of the measure. 18 September p.5
- In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating— p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,141
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: 2722566 1 Registered provider: Casterton Care Group Limited
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is owned and operated by a private company and provides care for up to four children who may experience social and emotional difficulties. The home registered with Ofsted in May 2023.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager has been registered since May 2025.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of this inspection, there were three children living at the home. All children spoke to the inspector.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2722566 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
13/08/2024 Full Good 13/02/2024 Full Requires improvement to be good 08/11/2023 Full Inadequate Inspection report for children’s home: 2722566 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Since the last inspection, two children have moved into the home. Children have experienced well-planned moves. They have had the opportunity to visit and spend time in the home before moving in. One child has been supported to move on from the home. The child has since visited staff and remains in touch with peers.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children have developed trusting relationships with staff. Staff are responsive to children’s needs and support them to make better choices. One child stated, ‘Staff are the reason I can wake up with a smile on my face.’ Professionals reported that children are making progress and that their risks have reduced with support from staff.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are making progress in respect of their education plans. Staff celebrate children’s educational achievements. For one child, this has included securing a recognised qualification. Children also engage in work experience arranged and scheduled by staff. This provides children with important life skills for their future.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are supported to maintain family relationships and, where possible, see family members. Children moving to family members’ care have thorough support plans implemented. For one child, this also included support with getting to know the local area and accessing community resources before they moved out.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children’s cultural identity and individuality are supported and discussed with them. Staff are creative in how they do this with children. Staff seek to find the answers to children’s questions about their heritage. An independent reviewing officer said staff have ‘promoted [name of child’s] sense of identity’.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are provided opportunities to attend extra-curricular activities, such as jiujitsu and gym classes. Furthermore, children have enjoyed holidays with staff. Children’s experiences since living in the home are captured in children’s memory scrapbooks.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children said that they like the home and feel safe. The staff support children to understand processes and procedures that are in place to safeguard them. As a result, children are aware of who they could speak to if they had any concerns.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are aware of children’s risks. They are proactive and creative in how they work with children to mitigate risks. The approaches by staff have supported children to make significant progress since living in the home. One youth offending worker said, ‘They [staff] want to go above and beyond to keep [name of child] safe.’ Inspection report for children’s home: 2722566 4 When children do not adhere to the agreed safety plans when they are in the community, staff take appropriate action. Staff search known areas and contact the relevant agencies. Children have also been provided with an opportunity to speak with an independent person.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
When physical intervention has been used, there is not always clear recording of the incident. Furthermore, staff are not consistently spoken to following the use of any measure. This is a missed opportunity to reflect on staff practice and identify which strategies are and are not effective in supporting children to calm.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff work proactively with external agencies. A social worker said that staff encourage children to engage with their visits, and as a result, they have always been effective. Furthermore, social workers and independent reviewing officers report that communication from the team is excellent.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Comprehensive employment checks are carried out during the recruitment process. Additionally, the manager and staff team are fully aware of the processes and procedures to follow to keep children safe if they have concerns in respect of staff practice.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff report that there have been positive changes since the manager has been in post. There is also a deputy manager in post who supports with the day-to-day running of the home. One staff member said, ‘Their [the manager’s] dedication and efforts contribute immensely to the well-being and development of the children.’
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff report that the management team creates a welcoming, supportive and well- structured environment for staff and children. Staff receive supervision sessions in line with the home’s statement of purpose. Additionally, team activity days have been implemented, which include children. This supports staff morale and relationship building.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has identified relevant training to support staff to meet children’s individualised needs. Furthermore, bespoke training courses have been sourced for staff. The team also benefits from therapeutic insight that is commissioned by the provider.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
A quality of care review has been completed and sent to the regulator. However, this did not incorporate the views of children and staff. Furthermore, when investigations have taken place, children are not always consulted. This is a missed opportunity to gather the views, wishes and feelings of children in respect of the quality of care they have received. Inspection report for children’s home: 2722566 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes—
p.5
Requirement Due date
a description of the measure and its duration;
p.5
Requirement Due date
the effectiveness and any consequences of the use of the measure; and
p.5
Requirement Due date
within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so (“the authorised person”)—
p.5
Requirement Due date
has spoken to the user about the measure; and
p.5
Requirement Due date
has signed the record to confirm it is accurate. (Regulation 35 (3)(a)(iv)(vii)(b)(i)(ii))
p.5
Requirement Due date
This relates specifically to the registered person ensuring that physical intervention records are clear and accurate with clear oversight of any intervention used.
p.5
Requirement Due date
Furthermore, this relates to the registered person ensuring that staff have been spoken to within the specified timescale about the use of the measure. 18 September
p.5
Requirement Due date
In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating—
p.5
Requirement Due date
the feedback and opinions of children about the children’s home, its facilities and the quality of care they receive in it. 18 September Inspection report for children’s home: 2722566 6 The system referred to in paragraph (2) must provide for ascertaining and considering the opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff. (Regulation 45 (2)(b) (5))
p.5
Requirement Due date
This relates specifically to the registered person ensuring that feedback of children, staff and professionals is taken into consideration when completing the quality of care review.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2722566 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Casterton Care Group Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 13 Montpelier Avenue, Bexley, Kent DA5 3AP
p.7
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Jonathan Broadstock
p.7
Inspector
Kitty Wiper, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2722566 8 and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion