Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
21 Aug 2025
- Inspectors verified
Hayley Doncom
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Not met
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY277149
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- implement effective systems to support children with SEND, ensuring clear communication and collaboration with external professionals so that each child receives the tailored support they need to thrive. 05/09/2025 p.4
- 21 August 2025 create and implement an ambitious curriculum with engaging, challenging activities that support all children to make progress across all areas of learning and prepare them well for their future learning 18/09/2025 p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder lacks sufficient knowledge of child development and does not provide an effective, structured curriculum, particularly for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). p.2
- Children's communication and language development are not effectively supported, resulting in children falling behind with no targeted intervention to help them catch up. p.2
- She has low expectations for what children can achieve, which does not support their confidence and resilience. p.2
- Weaknesses in the quality of education have been identified at previous inspections but, despite this, the childminder has not done enough to put this right. p.2
- The childminder has low expectations of children, which limits the opportunities she provides for them to develop confidence, resilience and independence. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 811
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not Met (with actions)
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder lacks sufficient knowledge of child development and does not provide an effective, structured curriculum, particularly for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). As a result, children become bored and disengaged, making limited progress in key areas, such as communication and language and physical development. The childminder does not organise the environment successfully to encourage independence, choice and the development of problem-solving skills. She has low expectations for what children can achieve, which does not support their confidence and resilience. In addition, she does not work effectively with external professionals, meaning children miss out on the consistent support they need. These significant weaknesses in the curriculum have a detrimental impact on children's learning and prevent them from developing the secure foundations needed for future learning.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children are content when playing with toys of their choice, such as cars. They sustain play for extended periods, organising it independently and demonstrating strong imagination as they pretend there has been a crash and that emergency services are required. Children eat well from the packed lunches provided by parents. They follow good hygiene routines and are beginning to develop some independence skills, such as removing the lids from their yoghurts.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder does not have a secure understanding of how children learn. Weaknesses in the quality of education have been identified at previous inspections but, despite this, the childminder has not done enough to put this right. This prevents her being able to effectively plan what children should learn during their time in her care. There is no structured curriculum in place to meet the needs of all children. Consequently, children show boredom as they flit from resources that are not age- and stage appropriate and, therefore, offer no challenge or engagement. The childminder spends time repeatedly requesting children to return to activities she has set up for them, such as a weighing pasta activity. n Children's communication and language development are not effectively supported, resulting in children falling behind with no targeted intervention to help them catch up. Children do not have enough support to engage in
p.2
need to do better?
conversation, and when conversations do take place, the childminder does not allow sufficient time for them to process information and respond. This restricts their interaction, confidence and language growth. n Children have limited opportunities for physical play, both indoors and outdoors, which restricts their physical development. They show signs of needing movement, such as fidgeting and becoming irritable, yet these needs are not
p.2
need to do better?
21 August 2025 responded to. When children do access the outdoor environment, older children are not provided with sufficiently challenging activities. For example, many resources are not appropriate for their age or stage of development. As a result, children do not benefit from vital opportunities to build physical skills and develop an understanding of how to keep themselves healthy. n The childminder's environment is not effectively organised, which restricts children's ability to engage in independent play and make their own choices. She limits their autonomy and curiosity, resulting in lower engagement and reduced opportunities for children to develop decision-making and problem-solving skills. n The childminder does not have effective systems in place for sharing information with other professionals, which negatively impacts the progress of children, particularly those with SEND. She does not collaborate with external
p.2
need to do better?
professionals involved in children's learning, resulting in a lack of consistent interventions. Consequently, children do not receive the support they need to be fully prepared for the next stage of their education, such as starting school. n The childminder has low expectations of children, which limits the opportunities she provides for them to develop confidence, resilience and independence. Despite this, she has established positive relationships and bonds with the children. n Children are supported to respect and maintain their privacy, particularly when using the toilet. They also develop good hygiene routines, such as washing their hands before meals and brushing their teeth afterwards. n Despite weaknesses in the overall quality of education, the childminder demonstrates an understanding of her safeguarding responsibilities. She knows how to identify signs of abuse and is clear about the procedures for reporting
p.3
need to do better?
any concerns. The childminder supervises the children well, particularly while eating.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
21 August 2025 create and implement an ambitious curriculum with engaging, challenging activities that support all children to make progress across all areas of learning and prepare them well for their future learning 18/09/2025
p.3
Due date
improve interactions to support children's communication and language skills 18/09/2025
p.4
Due date
improve support for children to develop their physical skills and to promote their overall health and well-being 05/09/2025
p.4
Due date
provide a well-organised and accessible environment that promotes children's choice, engagement and independence in play 18/09/2025
p.4
Due date
implement effective systems to support children with SEND, ensuring clear communication and collaboration with external professionals so that each child receives the tailored support they need to thrive. 05/09/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY277149 Local authority Southampton Inspection number 10411098 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 2 Date of previous inspection 11 March 2025
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2004. She lives in Southampton, Hampshire. She offers care from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday and all year round. The childminder holds a level 3 qualification. She receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years of age.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The inspector and childminder carried out a learning walk to understand how the early years provision and the curriculum are organised. n Three activity observations of the childminder's quality of teaching were carried out by the inspector. n The inspector held discussions with children and the childminder at appropriate times throughout the inspection. n The inspector looked at a sample of documentation. This included training and policies and procedures in relation to safeguarding. n A leadership meeting was held with the inspector and childminder.
p.5
Inspection activities
21 August 2025 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
21 August 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion