Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

St Vincent's School - A Specialist School for Sensory Impairment and Other Needs

Inspected — · published 15 Sept 2025 · URN 104734

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Bentham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steve Bentham

  • Postcode verified

    L12 9HN

  • Name on report verified

    a school not in a category of concern of St Vincent’s School - A Specialist School for Sensory Impairment and Other Needs

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyconfidentlypositivepreciselyimproving
Criticisminconsistentnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings645w+16
  • What needs to improve40w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
684
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 94%What needs to improve 6%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

David Swanston Headteacher St Vincent’s School - A Specialist School for Sensory Impairment and Other Needs Yew Tree Lane West Derby Liverpool Merseyside L12 9HN

p.1

School - A Specialist School for Sensory Impairment and Other Needs

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 8 July 2025, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school meets the monitoring threshold as set out in the Monitoring Inspection Handbook .

p.1

School - A Specialist School for Sensory Impairment and Other Needs

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s key and (where applicable) provision judgements, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

School - A Specialist School for Sensory Impairment and Other Needs

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also carried out visits to lessons, met with other staff, talked to pupils and looked at a sample of pupils’ work. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but some aspects of the

school need further improvement. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but some aspects of the

 continue to refine the curriculum to be more specific about what pupils will learn and to use this information to assess more precisely pupils’ recall of key knowledge.

p.2

Main findings

Since the school’s previous inspection, a new senior leadership team has been established. The acting headteacher was appointed as substantive headteacher in January 2025. An assistant headteacher and three other senior leaders have also been appointed. There have been some changes to the membership of the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

In most subjects, the school has started to set higher aspirations for pupils’ achievement by defining what it wants them to know and remember with greater clarity. This is helping staff to teach the curriculum more effectively. As a result, pupils are building on their previous learning in a more progressive manner. Staff are adept at helping pupils access their learning through a range of resources and different teaching approaches. However, the essential subject knowledge that pupils should gain is not set out well enough in a few subjects. Where this is the case, the delivery of curriculum content is inconsistent. In these subjects, pupils’ recall of what they have been taught is not strong enough.

p.2

Main findings

The school has started to check on how well pupils embed and remember their learning. Teachers use day-to-day checks, alongside more formal tests, to assess pupils’ understanding of the concepts that have been taught. However, because some learning has not been set out with sufficient clarity, teachers do not have the guidance that they need to assess pupils’ knowledge carefully in some areas of the curriculum. This means that, in some subjects, the checks that staff make do not identify pupils’ next steps in learning as well as they could.

p.2

Main findings

In reading, pupils develop their phonics knowledge well. Older pupils read confidently and with fluency as part of everyday classroom activities. They apply their skills to read unfamiliar words with ease.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection in April 2024, governors have increased their oversight of the school. They pose more pertinent questions than they did in the past. They also ask for evidence of school improvement so that they can assure themselves that the quality of education on offer at the school is improving.

p.2

Main findings

The school has brought about meaningful change in a relatively short space of time. It has used the support available to make positive changes to the curriculum. The support that staff have received means that they are all are on board with the school’s strategic vision and direction.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the director of education for the Archdiocese Liverpool, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Liverpool. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion