Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
12 Sept 2025
- URN verified
2650176
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety2
“She has also completed paediatric first aid training.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 268
- about usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 3 July 2025, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 2 September 2025 we carried out a regulatory telephone call. The focus of the call was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions, raised at their last inspection. We found that the childminder had improved their knowledge and understanding of safeguarding policies and procedures and understood who to make the appropriate referrals to if there was a concern about a child or an allegation against a household member. The childminder has now followed the correct procedures in notifying Ofsted of any persons who work directly with children. She has also completed paediatric first aid training. The childminder has strengthened her knowledge on welfare requirements such as key person and risk assessment to ensure children's individual needs are known and met. Also, that children are safe and secure in the environment. In addition, the childminder now ensures that drinking water is accessible to children at all times to access
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion