Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by The Place Young People’s Company
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
The Place Young People’s Company
- Inspection date verified
5 Aug 2025
- Inspectors verified
Jas Nahar
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2729367
- URN verified
2729367
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- External professionals and parents of children report that communication with the manager and staff is exceptionally strong. p.5
- This reflects the positive and trusting relationships that staff have developed with the children. p.3
- This approach fosters a non- judgemental environment where children feel safe to seek help and demonstrates a strong commitment to both the immediate and long-term well-being of children. p.4
- Staff understand how to keep children safe, and there are effective missing-from-home plans in place, with clear guidance on the actions staff should take if a child were to go missing. p.3
- Staff report that they enjoy working at the home and feel well supported by the manager. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- On one occasion, leaders failed to notify the police and the local authority designated officer of a serious incident within the required timeframe. p.5
- This delay compromised the timeliness of the safeguarding response and hindered coordinated intervention. p.5
- As a result, they have failed to identify shortfalls in staff practice and have not consistently taken the necessary steps to ensure that children are safe and well cared for. p.4
- Leaders’ and managers’ monitoring and review systems are ineffective. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This specifically relates to ensuring that there is adequate staff- to-child ratio on duty at all times and that the home’s monitoring systems are clear and effective. 8 September 2025 p.6
- The registered person must maintain records (‘‘case records’’) for each child which— p.6
- In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating— p.7
- After completing a quality of care review, the registered person must produce a written report about the quality of care review and the actions which the registered person intends to take as a result of the quality of care review (‘‘the quality of care review report’’). p.7
- This specifically relates to the registered person ensuring that there is a clear action plan to make improvements to the quality of children’s care. p.7
- The requirement is restated. 8 September 2025 p.7
- The registered person should ensure that staff engage with children in a supportive manner, helping them to understand and manage their emotions, while educating them about the consequences of their behaviour in a constructive and restorative way. p.7
- The registered person should ensure that all relevant persons are notified within the required timescales of regulation 40 when a serious incident occurs involving a child. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 1,635
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 1 Registered provider: The Place Young People’s Company Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This privately owned home provides care for up to three children who may experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The registered manager has the relevant experience and is qualified.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 4 November 2024
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
04/11/2024 Full Good 24/01/2024 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Since the last inspection, two children have moved into the home, and one child has moved out. At the time of this inspection, three children were living at the home. All three children spoke with the inspector.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff support children’s health needs through careful planning and effective communication with external providers. They ensure that children attend routine health appointments and, where necessary, seek specialist help, including referrals for counselling. This multi-agency approach to care ensures that children’s holistic needs are met.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
All three children are currently in education and maintain good attendance. Open lines of communication with their schools enable staff to remain highly attuned and responsive to any barriers the children may face in their learning. For example, the manager has referred one child to an education specialist to support their individual educational needs. This ensures early identification and targeted support, enabling the child to receive tailored interventions that enhance their learning experience and promote positive educational outcomes.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children take part in a range of activities, including bowling, horse riding, and day trips to explore new places and environments. Photos show them enjoying each other’s company and sharing positive experiences, such as spending time together in the garden and enjoying a barbecue. These activities support children’s social development, strengthen their relationships, and help build confidence by exposing them to new experiences in a fun and supportive setting.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children spend time with their families and other people who are important to them. Staff support children in contributing to decisions about these arrangements and actively seek their views. This helps children stay connected with those who are significant in their lives. One parent said, ‘When I see [name of child] with the staff, they are just brilliant.’
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The manager admitted two children into the home without fully assessing their individual needs or considering how their arrival might affect the children already living there. Although this has not had a detrimental impact, it highlights a lack of thorough planning and risk assessment by leaders, which undermines safe and well-considered placement decisions.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children trust staff. They say they enjoy living at the home and know they can approach staff if they have any worries. One child said, ‘The staff are like a big family.’ Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 4 There have been no episodes of children going missing from the home. This reflects the positive and trusting relationships that staff have developed with the children. Staff understand how to keep children safe, and there are effective missing-from-home plans in place, with clear guidance on the actions staff should take if a child were to go missing.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Disclosures and complaints are managed well. The manager ensures that children are safe and protected from harm and keeps them informed of outcomes. These actions help children feel confident in raising concerns and contribute to their sense of safety.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
When children hurt themselves, staff respond promptly with compassionate care and make referrals to specialist agencies for additional support. This approach fosters a non- judgemental environment where children feel safe to seek help and demonstrates a strong commitment to both the immediate and long-term well-being of children.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are trained in the use of physical intervention and apply it only as a last resort to protect children and others from harm. Following any incident, both children and staff are spoken to, ensuring that everyone involved has the opportunity to reflect and learn from the experience.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff do not consistently speak to children about their behaviours, how to manage their emotions, or how to take responsibility for their actions. This is a missed opportunity to help children understand their feelings, build emotional resilience and learn from their experiences. As a result, children are not well supported to manage challenges effectively.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The registered manager is experienced and dedicated and is supported by a capable and committed deputy manager. Both leaders know the children well and adopt a child- centred approach. Staff report that they enjoy working at the home and feel well supported by the manager.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Leaders’ and managers’ monitoring and review systems are ineffective. For example, several gaps were identified in recording practices. Children’s incident forms and records of key-work sessions are not consistently updated. Furthermore, discussions with professionals are not always documented, highlighting further discrepancies. Managers do not demonstrate sufficient professional curiosity when reviewing and evaluating incidents. As a result, they have failed to identify shortfalls in staff practice and have not consistently taken the necessary steps to ensure that children are safe and well cared for. This has led to inconsistencies in the delivery of high-quality care. Recording was identified as a shortfall at the last inspection and remains a concern.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
In addition to the above, while the manager updates the home’s statement of purpose, the revised document is not submitted to the regulator in line with regulatory requirements. The manager’s six-monthly quality of care review report does not include Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 5 a plan of action to improve the quality of care provided to children. This shortfall was identified at the last inspection and remains unresolved.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Children are not consistently supported in line with their required staff ratios. For example, on two occasions, children were not adequately supported due to insufficient staffing in relation to the required staff-to-child ratio. This has the potential to compromise the safety, supervision and overall quality of care delivered to children and undermines their trust in caregivers.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
On one occasion, leaders failed to notify the police and the local authority designated officer of a serious incident within the required timeframe. This delay compromised the timeliness of the safeguarding response and hindered coordinated intervention.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Team meetings and supervision sessions are held monthly. The manager also ensures that staff performance is appraised annually. These practices help to ensure that staff are well supported in their roles and in their ongoing professional development.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Staff receive regular training to ensure they have the skills and competencies required to meet the diverse needs of the children in their care. Systems are in place to ensure that training is routinely updated and refreshed.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
External professionals and parents of children report that communication with the manager and staff is exceptionally strong. Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 6
p.5
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.6
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.6
Requirement Due date
lead and manage the home in a way that is consistent with the approach and ethos, and delivers the outcomes, set out in the home’s statement of purpose;
p.6
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff work as a team where appropriate;
p.6
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a)(d)(h))
p.6
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to ensuring that there is adequate staff- to-child ratio on duty at all times and that the home’s monitoring systems are clear and effective. 8 September 2025
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must maintain records (‘‘case records’’) for each child which—
p.6
Requirement Due date
include the information and documents listed in Schedule 3 in relation to each child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
are signed and dated by the author of each entry. (Regulation 36 (1)(a)(b)(c)) 8 September 2025 Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 7 In particular, the registered person must ensure that all children’s records are up to date, are clearly written and factual, and that each record is appropriately signed and dated.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating—
p.7
Requirement Due date
the quality of care provided for children;
p.7
Requirement Due date
the feedback and opinions of children about the children’s home, its facilities, and the quality of care they receive in it; and
p.7
Requirement Due date
any actions that the registered person considers necessary in order to improve or maintain the quality of care provided for children.
p.7
Requirement Due date
After completing a quality of care review, the registered person must produce a written report about the quality of care review and the actions which the registered person intends to take as a result of the quality of care review (‘‘the quality of care review report’’). (Regulation 45 (2)(a)(b)(c) (3))
p.7
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to the registered person ensuring that there is a clear action plan to make improvements to the quality of children’s care.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The requirement is restated. 8 September 2025
p.7
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that staff engage with children in a supportive manner, helping them to understand and manage their emotions, while educating them about the consequences of their behaviour in a constructive and restorative way. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 22, paragraph 4.10) The registered person should ensure that all relevant persons are notified within the required timescales of regulation 40 when a serious incident occurs involving a child. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 63, paragraph 14.10) Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 8
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 9
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered provider: The Place Young People’s Company
p.9
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 2 Lymevale Court, Lyme Drive, Parklands, Stoke-on- Trent ST4 6NW
p.9
Inspector
Jas Nahar, Social Care Inspector Pavandeep Khosa, Inspector Assistant – West Midlands Region Inspection report for children’s home: 2729367 10 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.9
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion