Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

a school not in a category of concern of Skerne Park Academy

Inspected — · published 8 Sept 2025

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marcus Newby

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marcus Newby

  • Postcode verified

    DL1 5AJ

  • Name on report verified

    a school not in a category of concern of Skerne Park Academy

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimproved
Criticismgapsnot consistentlybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
704
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Clair Gooding Headteacher Skerne Park Academy Coleridge Gardens Darlington County Durham DL1 5AJ

p.1

Academy

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 12 June 2025, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school meets the monitoring threshold as set out in the Monitoring Inspection Handbook .

p.1

Academy

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s key and (where applicable) provision judgements, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

Academy

During the inspection, I discussed with you and the school’s middle leaders, a number of members of school staff, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the trust, the leader of education, the trust improvement partners, primary improvement partners, strategic partners and the chair of the academy council the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, spoke with a group of pupils, looked at examples of pupils’ work and considered curriculum information with subject leaders. I have considered all of this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Main findings

At the time of the last inspection, you were relatively new to the school. Since that inspection, steps have been taken to address the main areas for improvement. Three teachers with phase-specific responsibility have been appointed. The curriculum has been redesigned, and changes have been made to subject leadership.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders, in close collaboration with the trust, have developed a curriculum rooted in the key skills, concepts and knowledge that the school wants pupils to learn from the early years to Year 6. This work has resulted in a carefully structured curriculum which maps out the knowledge and skills that pupils need to build over time. Teachers are benefiting from increased guidance and support in delivering the school’s curriculum. There is evidence that teachers are beginning to check how well pupils are understanding important knowledge across a wider range of subjects better. More care is being taken to ensure that the activities pupils are set enable them to fulfil the aims of the curriculum. However, there remains much work to do for these improvements to be fully embedded.

p.2

Main findings

You and your team have put increased support in place for pupils. There are signs that pupils are now learning and remembering more of the school’s curriculum. Nevertheless, there remains more work to be done, and gaps in knowledge remain. In 2024, pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics in Year 6 was significantly below that seen nationally. The legacy of COVID-19 is still evident, particularly in the gaps in some pupils’ early language and social skills, which persist for some of the school’s oldest pupils.

p.2

Main findings

You and your team have taken action to enhance aspects of pupils’ personal development. There is now a greater focus on fundamental British values in the taught curriculum and in wider aspects of school life. You are continuing to refine and embed these aspects of provision.

p.2

Main findings

The school is checking how well the revised curriculum is being implemented. However, some of this work is not consistently well focused. This means that leaders are not as aware of the impact of improvement actions as they could be.

p.2

Main findings

The school has developed extra capacity to drive further improvement. The appointment of staff responsible for phase-specific improvements and subjects has brought further energy and focus to the school’s work. Support from the trust has provided strategic guidance, professional development and external quality assurance. This work has supported recent improvement. Trustees and governors are providing improved challenge and support. However, some aspects of quality assurance could be stronger.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the CEO of the Advance Learning Partnership Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Darlington. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion