Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Setting run by The Laurels Family Assessment Limited

Inspected 6 Aug 2025 · URN 2638338

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    The Laurels Family Assessment Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Aug 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Nicola Shaw, Sarah Huntbatch

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    2638338

  • URN verified

    2638338

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−22Mixedmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositivecleartimelysafestrongnurturingconsistently
Criticismlimitedseriousconcernslacknot alwaysseriouslyrequires improvementlacks

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1350w−21
  • What needs to improve736w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,079
longer than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 43
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%What needs to improve 30%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 1 Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

This residential family centre is registered for up to five families at any one time. The centre is privately owned.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

Families access the centre at the direction of the family court or the local authority for the purposes of assessment.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The manager registered with Ofsted in February 2023.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Date of previous inspection: 6 July 2022

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families have positive relationships with staff. Staff are nurturing and the work they complete with families is helpful and consistently good quality. Parents are supported to learn required parenting skills and staff provide a good balance of guidance and support. Children and parents are offered daily opportunities to take part a range of activities and groups which promote children’s well-being and support parental education.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

The centre is spacious, clean, tidy and well-furnished. It has all amenities for families to live comfortably in the setting alongside each other. The centre is on an enclosed site, which enables families to enjoy appropriate outdoor space safely.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Staff understand the health needs of children and their families. All families are supported to access local health services quickly when they move in. Arrangements for managing medication are safe and effective. Staff monitor children's health needs and step in when needed to ensure children stay healthy.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

A qualified and experienced social worker assesses families. Assessments are completed within court determined timescales and families have experienced timely decision making. Assessments provide a thorough analysis of practical parenting skills, however consideration of external risk factors, such as domestic abuse or substance misuse sometimes lacks the same depth. The assessments are reviewed by the manager and the responsible individual but are not discussed in detail with the social worker’s external, professionally qualified supervisor. A recommendation is been made in relation to this.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families are supported to understand how the assessment process works and know the expectations of the assessment. Parents contribute to their plans and are offered regular opportunities to provide feedback. Records and assessments are clear on the family’s views, evidencing their learning and perspectives.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Staff support parents to maintain employment whilst living at the centre. One parent engaged with a positive parenting assessment whilst also working part time. Staff understood and monitored the risks associated with the increased time away from the centre. This helps families to successfully transition back into their community.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families know how to complain, and the centre’s complaints policy is accessible and easy to understand. However, there is no written record of the investigation or outcome of some complaints. This is a missed opportunity to evidence that parent’s views are listened to and taken seriously. A requirement has been made in relation to this. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 3

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Families feel safe in the centre and serious incidents are rare. The environment is safe and secure. Families and children do not go missing from the centre.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The managers and staff have effective working relationships with the multi-agency partners involved with the families. Partner agencies report good communication and responsiveness of managers and staff.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The manager takes allegations about staff seriously. They take immediate action to ensure the safety of families and children and investigate concerns promptly and thoroughly.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Surveillance and electronic monitoring in the centre are used appropriately, in line with regulations and the centre’s published policy. The families are aware of the monitoring and are clear about where and when it will be used. This promotes their privacy and dignity whilst living in the centre.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Risk assessments contain historical risks, and relevant current information, such as supervision levels in the centre. However, they lack detail in relation to the risks and clear strategies for staff to follow. Therefore, there has been inconsistency in the way signals of increasing risk have been responded to in the centre. Some families have had timely increased monitoring and reviews of CCTV, and some have not.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The risk assessments undertaken prior to families joining the centre lack detail and full consideration of the risks of families living together. Some of the risk assessments lack professional curiosity regarding the information provided by the placing authorities. A requirement in relation to risk assessments is made.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Two staff have been able to start in the centre prior to having an enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check. The manager placed restrictions around these staff to mitigate the risk. However, this is not in line with regulation. Staff recruitment files evidence that staff have DBS checks when these are received, but do not demonstrate that original checks have been seen by managers and when. A requirement is made in relation to this.

p.3

good

The manager has been in post and registered since February 2023. The responsible individual has been in post since 2022. There have been several staff changes over the inspection period. However, staffing has been stable over the last year. Staff come to the role with relevant skills and experience. Therefore, there are consistent management and staffing arrangements for the centre.

p.3

good

Management oversight and monitoring does not always recognise when there are shortfalls within the service. The information provided within inspection was sometimes inaccurate, some complaints and incidents had not been recorded as Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 4 such or lacked sufficient detail, and manager’s audits did not always reflect the current position of the service. A requirement is made in relation to this.

p.3

good

The manager does not ensure that clear court directions are on file for each family assessment. The manager requests these for all families from the placing authority but does not escalate this when they are not received. The assessing social worker has relied on gathering information about the aims and structure of assessments from the local authority social workers, however for one family, information given to the centre about the length of placement was not accurate to the direction of the court. A requirement has been made in relation to this.

p.4

good

The centre has recruited an independent visitor to complete regular monitoring visits. This allows for external scrutiny of the centre. The visits are timely and the manager responds to the recommendations made. However, the visits do not always identify shortfalls in practice.

p.4

good

Serious incidents have not been notified to the regulator, nor have any updates to the Statement of Purpose and Resident’s Guide been provided. This has limited the regulator's ability to have prompt oversight of any safeguarding concerns and have thorough understanding of the service. Requirements have been made in relation to these matters.

p.4

good

Staff report a supportive and positive work environment. The manager ensures that staff feel valued and motivated to work at the centre. Staff have regular supervision with the manager or another senior leader within the centre. All those who provide supervision to other staff have training to do so. Managers and leaders provide strong support to staff and focus on developing practice.

p.4

good

There are staff working in the centre who are related. However, appropriate supervision arrangements have been made for these staff, and other staff are aware of the relationships and arrangements, and how to report concerns in a safe way.

p.4

good

Staff have access to a wide range of training, including child development and attachment. Training is delivered to staff both face to face and online. Staff complete the training allocated to them and are well prepared for their roles.

p.4

good

Most staff have the relevant qualification or are enrolled to undertake this in timescale. Some staff are not qualified or enrolled, although they have other relevant qualifications, including social work degrees. A requirement is made in relation to this.

p.4

good

Since the last inspection, the manager has increased the frequency at which they undertake reviews of the quality of the service. The review reports are timely, include feedback from families and other stakeholders, and focus on the experiences of families in the centre. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 5

p.4

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.5

Requirement Due date

employ a person to work at the residential family centre unless that person is fit to work at a residential family centre;

p.5

Requirement Due date

allow a person to whom paragraph (2) applies, to work at the residential family centre unless that person is fit to work at a residential family centre.

p.5

Requirement Due date

This paragraph applies to any person who is employed by a person other than the registered person in a position in which he may in the course of his duties have regular contact with residents.

p.5

Requirement Due date

For the purposes of paragraph (1), a person is not fit to work at a residential family centre unless—

p.5

Requirement Due date

he has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary for the work he is to perform and;

p.5

Requirement Due date

full and satisfactory information is available in relation to him in respect of each of the matters specified in Schedule 2. (Regulation 16 (1)(a)(b) (2) (3)(b)(d))

p.5

Requirement Due date

Specifically, that staff should not be allowed to commence work until their enhanced Disclosure and Barring checks have been received. Staff should also complete their level 3 Children and Young People’s Workforce Diploma or be working towards the relevant qualifications within six months of confirmation of employment.

p.5

Requirement Due date

This requirement is restated. 29 October 2025

p.5

Requirement Due date

The registered provider and the registered manager shall, having regard to the size of the residential family centre, the 29 October 2025 Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 6 statement of purpose, and the number and needs of the residents, carry on or manage the centre (as the case may be) with sufficient care, competence and skill. (Regulation 8 (1))

p.5

Requirement Due date

Specifically, there should be clear and effective procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the centre.

p.6

Requirement Due date

If, in relation to a residential family centre, any of the events listed in column 1 of the table in Schedule 5 takes place, the registered person shall without delay notify the persons indicated in respect of the event in column 2 of the table. (Regulation 26 (1))

p.6

Requirement Due date

Specifically, that all serious events in the centre should be notified without delay to Ofsted. 29 October 2025

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall, before providing a family with accommodation in the residential family centre, or if that is not reasonably practicable, as soon as possible thereafter, draw up in consultation with the placing authority a written plan (in these Regulations referred to as "the placement plan") setting out, in particular—

p.6

Requirement Due date

an assessment of the risks, if any, which a resident at the residential family centre may present to their own health, safety and welfare or that of other residents or staff at the centre. (Regulation 13 (1)(c))

p.6

Requirement Due date

Specifically, that thorough risk assessments should be completed prior to a family moving into the centre that consider the safety and welfare of other residents. All risk assessments should contain detail regarding risk factors and have clear strategies to manage risk for staff to follow.

p.6

Requirement Due date

This requirement is restated. 29 October 2025

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person must ensure that a written record is made of any complaint or representation, the action taken in response, and the outcome of the investigation. (Regulation 20 (6) 29 October 2025

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall maintain in respect of each family accommodated in the residential family centre a record which—

p.6

Requirement Due date

includes the information, documents and other records specified in Schedule 3 relating to the members of the family. 29 October 2025 Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 7 (Regulation 19 (1)(a))

p.6

Requirement Due date

Specifically, the registered manager should ensure that a letter of instruction from the court is on all families’ case files.

p.7

Requirement Due date

keep under review and where appropriate revise the statement of purpose and resident's guide; and

p.7

Requirement Due date

notify the [Chief Inspector] within 28 days of any such revision. (Regulation 4 (4)(a)(b)) 29 October 2025

p.7

Recommendation

 The registered person should ensure that the assessments are carried out by a registered social worker in a manner consistent with guidance in Working Together to Safeguard Children. Working Together to Safeguard Children says that the analysis and decision-making should be a collaborative process between the lead practitioner and the multi-agency team working with the family, including the social work qualified practice supervisor or manager. (Residential family centres: NMS 1.2)

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the 'Social care common inspection framework'. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 8

p.7

Residential family centre details

Registered provider: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited

p.8

Residential family centre details

Email address: info@thelaurelsfamily.co.uk

p.8

Inspectors

Sarah Huntbatch, Social Care Inspector Nicola Shaw, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: The Laurels Family Assessment Limited 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion