Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years complaint outcome

Monkey Puzzle Day Nursery Battersea

Inspected 1 Sept 2025 · published 15 Aug 2025 · URN EY560540

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Sept 2025

  • URN verified

    EY560540

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−69Very criticalmore positive than 16% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
270
about usual (typical 281)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 42
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 1
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Summary of outcome

On 19 June 2025, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to safeguarding policies and procedures, key person arrangements and information and record keeping.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 21 July 2025, we received additional concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to suitable people and qualifications, training, support and skills.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 8 August 2025, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take .

p.1

Summary of outcome

The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.

p.1

Summary of outcome

n ensure all staff with designated safeguarding lead responsibility know and understand the procedure to follow in the event of an allegation being made against an adult working at the setting

p.1

Summary of outcome

n ensure there is an up-to-date written record of all complaints received and their outcome.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 28 August 2025, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had strengthened support for all staff with designated safeguarding lead responsibility to improve their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures.

p.1

Summary of outcome

Additionally, leaders have ensured there is an up-to-date record of complaints received.

p.1

Summary of outcome

We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.

p.1

Publication of complaints

We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.

p.1

Publication of complaints

We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.

p.1

Publication of complaints

For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion