Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Horwich Day Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
28 Aug 2025
- URN verified
2836747
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 625
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 8 July 2025, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to staff:child ratios, safeguarding policies and procedures, suitable people, qualifications, training, support and skills, safety and suitability of premises, environment and equipment and information and record keeping. On 21 July 2025, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to information and record keeping, safeguarding policies and procedures, qualifications, training, support and skills, health, safety and suitability of premises, environment and equipment.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 28 July 2025, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements. On 4 August 2025, we served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure there is a qualified manager in place who has the appropriate qualifications, training, skills and knowledge
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure staffing arrangements meet the needs of all children
p.1
Summary of outcome
n implement robust vetting procedures for all new staff to ensure their suitability to work with children has been established
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure designated safeguarding leads have up-to-date training and knowledge of safeguarding issues in line with local safeguarding reporting and procedures
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure effective arrangements are in place to support children with special educational needs and/ or disabilities, that include making timely assessments and referrals, to ensure their individual needs are met n ensure required documents are organised and easily accessible and available for inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 28 August 2025, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection. There is now a manager in place who has the required qualifications needed to fulfil this role. The provider has ensured that there are enough qualified staff to work with the children. Leaders have reviewed the staffing arrangements to ensure these meet the needs of all children. Leaders have accessed training in how to implement robust vetting procedures for all staff. Suitability checks have been completed for all staff to ensure their suitability to work with children. The lead practitioner for safeguarding has attended a child protection training course to improve their knowledge about the local safeguarding policies and procedures. Leaders and staff demonstrate a good understanding of the possible signs of abuse and the steps to take if they had any concerns about a child's welfare. Leaders
p.2
Summary of outcome
have appointed a named special educational needs co-ordinator. They have provided training to support them to fulfil this role. Leaders have implemented new arrangements to support staff to identify when children may benefit from additional support to meet their individual needs. Required documents have been organised to ensure they are readily available for inspection. Leaders have increased the monitoring throughout the setting.
p.2
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised.
p.2
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion