Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Jun 2025
- Inspectors verified
Natalie Myatt
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
404541
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She shows a lack of understanding of the signs that a child might be at risk of abuse. p.2
- The childminder does not consistently supervise children effectively. p.2
- She does not recognise the signs and symptoms of abuse and fails to take the actions required of her role to safeguard children. p.2
- These breaches of requirements have a significant impact on children's safety and welfare. p.2
- The childminder has a poor understanding of how children learn. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety4
“The childminder does not use risk assessments effectively.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 869
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not take the necessary steps to ensure children are safe. She does not recognise the signs and symptoms of abuse and fails to take the actions required of her role to safeguard children. The childminder does not consistently supervise children in her care. She does not work effectively with other agencies to manage risks to children's safety. The childminder does not use risk assessments effectively to ensure that children are safe in the property. These breaches of requirements have a significant impact on children's safety and welfare.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not deliver a curriculum that gives children the knowledge and skills they need to make good progress. The childminder does not use assessment effectively to monitor children's progress and make plans for further learning. When the childminder identifies delays in children's learning, she does not take appropriate action to support the child's progress or seek further support. The childminder does not plan effective learning experiences. Interactions with children do not extend children's learning or promote positive behaviour. The childminder does not consistently work with parents to help them understand children's progress and support their learning to continue at home.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children enjoy playing with toys in the setting and smile as they handle the childminder's rabbits. The childminder offers some praise and encouragement to children. She tells them they are clever and that they are good children. This somewhat promotes children's self-confidence.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder does not have a clear understanding of the safeguarding and welfare requirements. She shows a lack of understanding of the signs that a child might be at risk of abuse. This does not protect children from potential harm. n The childminder does not consistently supervise children effectively. She does not recognise when it is necessary to supervise children more closely, such as when she identifies a risk. The childminder also does not supervise children effectively as they sleep in prams in the back garden. This puts children at risk. n The childminder does not work effectively with other agencies. She does not exchange information or seek support about concerns. This prevents the childminder from working together to keep children safe. n The childminder does not use risk assessments effectively. When children are hurt because of a broken door, she does not take steps to remove or manage
p.2
need to do better?
this risk. Further to this, she does not recognise the risk this could pose in preventing exit in an emergency. n The childminder does not provide a broad curriculum that meets the needs of
p.2
need to do better?
27 June 2025 the children in her care. She does not have a secure understanding of what she wants children to learn. When she plans activities and outings, she does not think about how they support the curriculum. This does not support children to make good progress in their learning. n The childminder has a poor understanding of how children learn. She does not engage with children while they play. Children's attempts to seek her attention or engage her in their play receive little response. This does not provide children with the support or motivation they need to learn. n The childminder does not use assessment effectively. She does not have a secure understanding of what children already know and can do. Consequently, she cannot use this information to plan to meet their needs. When the childminder does recognise delays, she does not put plans in place to meet children's learning needs. n The childminder does not communicate with parents effectively about children's
p.2
need to do better?
learning. She does not help them to understand their child's learning needs and when they might need further support. However, some parents are happy with the communication the childminder provides about what activities their children have done each day and how she is supporting them with care needs, such as toilet training. n The childminder has not maintained standards since her last inspection. Actions raised at this inspection are similar to issues raised in previous inspections. This includes requirements relating to safeguarding, supervision and risk assessment. This means that the childminder is unable to reflect on her practice in order to make and sustain improvements.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
demonstrate a secure understanding of safeguarding knowledge including how to recognise when children are at risk and the procedures to follow 01/08/2025
p.3
Due date
27 June 2025 demonstrate knowledge of procedures to communicate with other agencies when required, in order to manage risks to children 01/08/2025
p.3
Due date
demonstrate an understanding of how to keep children safe and prevent their exposure to risks including when they are sleeping and when closer supervision may be necessary 01/08/2025
p.4
Due date
take all reasonable steps to ensure the premises are safe and people can exit in an emergency. 01/08/2025
p.4
Due date
demonstrate an understanding of how to identify children's interests, abilities and next steps in learning, and how to use this information to improve the planning of enjoyable experiences to help children make progress 01/08/2025
p.4
Due date
demonstrate how to monitor children's progress effectively in order to ensure their learning and development is on track, including establishing starting points for all children 01/08/2025
p.4
Due date
explain how to keep parents informed of children's progress and address learning and development needs in partnership with parents and relevant professionals. 01/08/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 404541 Local authority Trafford Inspection number 10394440 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6 Date of previous inspection 5 September 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2001 and lives in Sale Moor, Manchester. She operates all year round from 7.15am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 3.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their early years foundation stage curriculum. n Children communicated with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder and the children. n The childminder and the inspector carried out a joint observation during a planned activity. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.5
Inspection activities
27 June 2025 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
27 June 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion