Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Hampshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Jun 2025
- Inspectors verified
Melissa Cox
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY412978
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- create an emotionally supportive and engaging learning environment that builds children's confidence, resilience and supports their self-esteem to a good level 25/07/2025 p.3
- ensure that the content and sequencing for each of the areas of learning are clear, and children are supported to progress towards appropriately ambitious outcomes that are reflective of what they need to learn next 25/07/2025 p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder fails to recognise the significant weaknesses in her interactions with children or the impact this has on children's emotional health. p.2
- The childminder demonstrates a poor capacity to improve. p.2
- The childminder's attitude towards making the required improvements is poor. p.2
- The childminder has not sought training or guidance or taken any action to address weaknesses that impact on children's experiences in the setting. p.2
- Activities are poorly matched to children's interests or learning styles. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families4
“Partnerships with parents are weak.” p.3Personal development2
“Fundamental British values are not promoted in the setting.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 796
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder demonstrates a poor capacity to improve. She has not made meaningful changes to the provision for children's learning since the last inspection. The childminder does not provide enjoyable learning experiences for children. The curriculum is overly focused on formal instruction and offers little opportunity for children to learn through play-based, nurturing experiences. Children are frequently asked to complete tasks they are not developmentally ready for. For example, young children are expected to identify complex shapes that are beyond their stage of development.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children have formed attachments with the childminder. They behave appropriately, waiting for the childminder's direction. However, the childminder does not create an environment that supports children's personal, social and emotional development well. The childminder's approach to teaching has a negative impact on children's emotional well-being overall. Children join in activities because they are directed to, rather than through curiosity or enthusiasm. They generally comply with the childminder's requests and follow familiar routines. However, their attitude towards learning is mostly passive. Some children show signs of apprehension or hesitation, indicating they do not always feel secure and confident in the environment. As a result, children do not develop a positive attitude to learning or build the self- assurance they need to explore and try new things.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Fundamental British values are not promoted in the setting. The childminder does not support children to understand concepts, such as turn-taking, mutual respect or listening to each other's views. There are limited opportunities for children to explore cultural diversity, democracy or individuality. These are not promoted positively. This does not prepare children well for life in modern Britain.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder's attitude towards making the required improvements is poor. She does not reflect on her practice to improve the quality of the service she provides. The childminder has not sought training or guidance or taken any action to address weaknesses that impact on children's experiences in the setting. The childminder fails to recognise the significant weaknesses in her interactions with children or the impact this has on children's emotional health. Her capacity to offer children a good-quality learning experience is not assured. n Despite the weaknesses in the quality of education, safeguarding arrangements have improved since the last inspection. The childminder understands the procedure to follow if she has a concern about a child, in line with local procedures. However, the childminder's failure to nurture children's emotional well-being undermines children's ability to feel safe and secure. Safeguarding is
p.2
need to do better?
6 June 2025 ineffective as a result. n Children are not well prepared for the next stage in learning. Although children learn a range of new skills over time, this is not necessarily in areas that benefit them most. The childminder does not identify gaps in children's learning, such as those that affect children's social skills and confidence to develop friendships. Activities are poorly matched to children's interests or learning styles. Some children lack the necessary skills essential for their move to school. n The childminder has suitable regard to promoting children's personal development. She provides some encouragement for young children as they make attempts at putting on their own shoes. The childminder provides opportunities for children to explore the local environment and learn about the immediate community. For example, children go on walks to a nearby farm to visit the animals and learn to identify common garden birds. However, at times,
p.2
need to do better?
the childminder promotes stereotypical views of culture and gender. This impacts on children's ability to understand and appreciate diversity in society and does not support all children to develop a positive self-image and good self-esteem. n Partnerships with parents are weak. Children do not benefit from a joined-up approach to care or education. There is little opportunity for parents to contribute their own knowledge of their child to work together with the childminder to support consistent approaches at home and in the setting. The childminder holds a poor knowledge of additional funding, including early years pupil premium. As a result, funding has not been used to good effect to ensure all families receive their full entitlement.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
create an emotionally supportive and engaging learning environment that builds children's confidence, resilience and supports their self-esteem to a good level 25/07/2025
p.3
Due date
6 June 2025 ensure that children's development is guided through a balance of child-led and adult-initiated, high-quality and purposeful activities and interactions 25/07/2025
p.3
Due date
ensure that the content and sequencing for each of the areas of learning are clear, and children are supported to progress towards appropriately ambitious outcomes that are reflective of what they need to learn next 25/07/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure that partnerships with parents allow for a regular two-way flow of information, which promotes collaboration and helps to support continuity in children's care, learning and development. 25/07/2025
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY412978 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 10391142 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 3 Date of previous inspection 20 January 2025
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2010. She lives in the Christchurch area of Dorset. She operates from Monday to Friday, 7.30am to 5pm, for 50 weeks a year. She has a relevant childminding qualification. The childminder provides government funded early education places for children aged from nine months to four years.
p.5
Inspection activities
n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their early years foundation stage curriculum. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided indoors and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n Children spoke to the inspector about what they enjoy doing while with the childminder. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.5
Inspection activities
6 June 2025 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
6 June 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion