Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by HMO NE Ltd

Inspected 24 Jun 2025 · URN 2811916

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    HMO NE Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Jun 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Gary Smithson, Joanne Wallis

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    2811916

  • URN verified

    2811916

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−31Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesafeeffectivewell supportedwell plannedstrongproudpositiveeffectively
Criticismat riskharmlackinadequaterequires improvementnot consistentlyconcernsmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1119w−3
  • What needs to improve679w−63

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,797
longer than usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 51
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
7
typical 4
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%What needs to improve 32%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 1 Registered provider: HMO NE Ltd

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This home is owned and managed by a private provider. It provides care for up to two children with social and emotional difficulties.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The manager and the home registered with Ofsted in January 2025.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of last inspection: not previously inspected

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

This is the home’s first inspection after registration. One child was living in the home at the time of the inspection and inspectors met with the child.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The move into the home for the child was well planned. Staff supported the child to have introductions to the home before moving in and listened to the child’s views about how this should take place. This helped the child settle in with ease and showed at an early stage that their views are important.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child is supported to engage with their learning. When the child has struggled to be prepared for their school day, staff encourage and support the child and take them to school. This support has helped the child to take examinations. Staff reward and celebrate the child’s achievements and this shows the child how proud staff are of them.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child’s views are important to staff. Children’s meetings take place to discuss the running of the home. The child is open about any improvements that can be made and discusses what is going well. The manager writes a letter to the child after each meeting and this provides a summary of the meeting and lets the child know that their views have been listened to and what actions staff have taken.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff work well with the child to have conversations about their day-to-day arrangements, education and independence. This leads to the child being engaged in some activities of their choice. They also do independence work and explore work experience and options for the child’s future skills and employment.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child’s essential records are mainly up to date. The placing local authority care plan and review minutes are held on the child’s files and record the child’s progress and some areas of regression in these early days of living in the home. However, the child does not have a pathway plan in place. There has not been any challenge from the staff to gain this plan for the child to help the child understand what their future may hold.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The child is registered with essential medical services. Staff are proactive in ensuring the child attends appointments for their physical health. This includes the child receiving immunisations that they had previously missed. However, escalation for the child to receive specialist therapeutic support does not take place in a timely manner, therefore leaving the child without the support they need. Although the staff have developed positive working relationships with the placing authority, they have not worked effectively to advocate for the child to access specialist support. Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 3

p.2

improvement to be good

The child’s risk assessment does not reflect their known risks and vulnerabilities. Expert assessments of known risks are not detailed in the child’s plan and staff lack understanding of the assessed risks and how these should be managed. Decision-making to explore another child moving into the home has therefore not taken into consideration the impact of these known risks and how this can be managed with another child in the home. The lack of understanding could place children at risk of harm.

p.3

improvement to be good

Activity risk assessments are not individualised to the child, as these are generic. Therefore, staff do not have strategies to help keep the child safer when they go out into the community or strategies to best support the child.

p.3

improvement to be good

The home’s safe recruitment policy is not consistently followed. Although there is a policy in place to ensure that there is a thorough scrutiny of adults who come to work in the home, the manager does not follow the procedures to ensure full information is gained. The manager is making changes to their involvement in recruitment to ensure the policy is followed.

p.3

improvement to be good

There are no systems in place for the management of negative consequences. Although staff will put consequences in place, these are not natural consequences or restorative. Therefore, there is no system in place for the manager to have oversight and evaluate their effectiveness.

p.3

improvement to be good

There have been no incidents of physical intervention in the home or episodes of going missing since the home opened. Staff are trained in both areas so that they know how to support the child in a crisis or when they are missing.

p.3

improvement to be good

Allegations are rare but well-managed in the home. There has only been one allegation raised since the home opened and the manager followed a thorough process to explore this. In addition, the manager was open with professionals about the concerns and worked with partner agencies and the local area designated officer to try to reach a safe conclusion.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager has strong systems in place to ensure he has effective oversight of the home. This includes monthly monitoring forms that are provided for senior managers, such as the responsible individual, to ensure they are appraised of the progress in the home. The manager can highlight if there are any areas for improvement, and what is going well.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff are well supported through regular supervision sessions with a manager. The sessions are well recorded and provide an opportunity for staff to reflect on their practice, children and their own development. In addition, the manager regularly records Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 4 monitoring and support sessions and this provides a summary of staff progress through their probation periods and induction. The support in place adds to the feedback from staff that they are well supported by the manager.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The home has a small team of experienced and qualified staff who work in the home. To ensure continuity of care for the child, the manager has taken up gaps in shifts previously to reduce the need for agency staff. This has reduced overtime, and the manager will only work additional shifts to spend quality time with the child.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager identified that the staff would need training specific to the child in their care. Additional training is being explored for staff to have training to support a trauma- informed response. The manager is keen to ensure that staff develop in their roles. He encourages staff to be proactive in their learning and how this can apply to their practice regarding regulations. Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 5

p.4

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.5

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.

p.5

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—

p.5

Requirement Due date

assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;

p.5

Requirement Due date

help each child to understand how to keep safe;

p.5

Requirement Due date

have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm;

p.5

Requirement Due date

understand the roles and responsibilities in relation to protecting children that are assigned to them by the registered person. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(v))

p.5

Requirement Due date

In particular, the registered person must ensure that children’s plans and risk assessments include children’s known risks and work identified to reduce risks, and that activity risk assessments are individualised to the child.

p.5

Requirement Due date

In addition, the registered person must be satisfied that risks are fully assessed before moving additional children into the home. 8 August 2025

p.5

Requirement Due date

In meeting the quality standards, the registered person must, and must ensure that staff—

p.5

Requirement Due date

seek to involve each child’s placing authority effectively in the child’s care, in accordance with the child’s relevant plans; 8 August 2025 Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 6 seek to secure the input and services required to meet each child’s needs;

p.5

Requirement Due date

if the registered person considers, or staff consider, a placing authority’s or a relevant person’s performance or response to be inadequate in relation to their role, challenge the placing authority or the relevant person to seek to ensure that each child’s needs are met in accordance with the child’s relevant plans. (Regulation 5(a)(b)(c))

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person must prepare and implement a policy (“the behaviour management policy”) which sets out—

p.6

Requirement Due date

how appropriate behaviour is to be promoted in the children’s home; and

p.6

Requirement Due date

the measures of control, discipline and restraint which may be used in relation to children in the home.

p.6

Requirement Due date

within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes—

p.6

Requirement Due date

details of the child’s behaviour leading to the use of the measure;

p.6

Requirement Due date

the date, time and location of the use of the measure;

p.6

Requirement Due date

a description of the measure and its duration;

p.6

Requirement Due date

details of any methods used or steps taken to avoid the need to use the measure;

p.6

Requirement Due date

the name of the person who used the measure (“the user”), and of any other person present when the measure was used;

p.6

Requirement Due date

the effectiveness and any consequences of the use of the measure; and

p.6

Requirement Due date

a description of any injury to the child or any other person, and any medical treatment administered, as a result of the measure; 8 August 2025 Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 7 within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so (“the authorised person”)—

p.6

Requirement Due date

has spoken to the user about the measure; and

p.7

Requirement Due date

has signed the record to confirm it is accurate; and

p.7

Requirement Due date

within 5 days of the use of the measure, the registered person or the authorised person adds to the record confirmation that they have spoken to the child about the measure. (Regulation 35 (1)(a)(b) (3)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(vii)(b)(i)ii)(c))

p.7

Requirement Due date

In particular, the registered person must ensure there are systems in place to record, monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of negative consequences used within the home.

p.7

Recommendation

 The registered person should ensure good employment practice. They should ensure that recruitment, supervision and performance management of staff safeguards children and minimises potential risks to them. In particular, the registered person must ensure that the provider’s safe recruitment policy and procedures are followed. (Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards, page 61, paragraph 13.1)

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Hallgate House, 9 Grange Terrace, Sunderland SR2 7DF

p.8

Inspectors

Joanne Wallis, Social Care Inspector Gary Smithson, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2811916 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspectors

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion