Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Westbourne Academy

Inspected 11 Jun 2025 · published 22 Jul 2025 · URN 139288

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bessie Owen (lead), Charlie Fordham, Claire Robins, Louise Cooper, Tessa Holledge

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Jun 2025

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Bessie Owen, Charlie Fordham, Claire Robins, Louise Cooper, Tessa Holledge

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    IP1 5JN

  • Name on report verified

    Westbourne Academy

  • URN verified

    139288

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.

  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+2Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivevery wellpolitepositivehigh expectationswarmenjoy
Criticismpoordisruptivetoo oftenstruggleconcernsnot cleardisruptionlack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1451w+1
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,431
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Westbourne Academy Marlow Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP1 5JN

p.1

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

The principal of this school is Martin Higgon. This school is part of Academy Transformation Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Mark McCourt, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Pat Beanland. 10 and 11 June 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils behave very well. They are polite, friendly and work hard. Pupils are pleased when there are no distractions so they can get on well with their learning. Where behaviour is settled, pupils benefit from warm and positive relationships with staff. However, learning is frequently interrupted by the poor behaviour of some pupils. These pupils frequently display disruptive behaviour in lessons and corridors which significantly impacts the smooth running of the school. This behaviour can be intimidating and leaves some staff and pupils feeling nervous and unsettled.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Mostly the school has high expectations of pupils’ achievement. However, these are not fully realised. In some lessons, particularly where there are fewer disruptions, pupils enjoy their learning and achieve well. However, too often, teachers are unable to deliver the curriculum effectively due to the poor behaviour of some pupils. When this happens, pupils do not achieve as well as they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are taught about life in modern Britain through a well-considered programme that promotes their personal development. They are taught about respect and tolerance. Many pupils are considerate and kind. However, a significant minority of pupils do not demonstrate these values. Many pupils dislike the prejudicial language that they frequently hear around school.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has a well-structured curriculum in place. It is appropriately designed to build on pupils’ prior learning and deepen their understanding over time. Many teachers are skilled in delivering the curriculum effectively. They explain new information clearly and check pupils’ understanding at appropriate times. ‘Do now’ tasks are frequently used at the start of lessons to help pupils recall prior learning. Teachers often use this information well to provide targeted support to pupils who need it. Where this happens, and when learning is not disrupted by poor behaviour, pupils achieve well.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In contrast, some pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not receive the same educational experience. The school does not have a clear enough understanding of pupils’ specific needs, particularly the needs of pupils with SEND. The systems to check how well these pupils are doing, both academically and emotionally, are not strong enough. Some pupils with SEND are taught, on occasion, in separate rooms. These spaces are not used well enough to provide them with the targeted help that they need. As a result, many pupils with SEND struggle to access their learning successfully.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has some support in place for pupils who are at the earliest stages of learning to read. However, this support is not closely checked to see how effective it is. The school does not have a clear enough picture of which pupils need extra help with reading or how well they are doing. As a result, some pupils, including those with SEND, do not get the 10 and 11 June 2025

p.2

3

help that they need to develop reading skills quickly. This means they struggle to read fluently and to access the wider curriculum.

p.3

3

The school has not established a consistent or effective approach to managing pupils’ behaviour. Many staff feel unsupported. Disruption is frequent, in lessons and around the school, with many pupils displaying a lack of self-discipline and respect towards others. As a result, some pupils feel anxious. Pupils’ attendance rates are low and show little sign of improvement, reflecting the negative attitudes that some pupils have towards school. However, many pupils are kind, polite and eager to learn. They are keen to do well, but their experience is too often disrupted by the poor behaviour of others.

p.3

3

Some pupils experience derogatory language from their peers. This can be linked to race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation. This behaviour has become normalised, so incidents are frequently not reported. When they are reported, staff respond appropriately. However, the school is not taking effective action to address this issue. As a result, some pupils are not developing the respect and tolerance needed to live and work in a diverse society.

p.3

3

Pupils who take part in activities such as Cadets and football are positive about these opportunities, which help them to build confidence, teamwork and leadership skills. However, a significant minority of pupils do not access a wide or rich set of experiences to develop their talents and interests. From Year 7, pupils learn about the wide range of careers open to them.

p.3

3

The school, including trustees and member of the local governing body, are aware of the challenges that the school faces. Although they have taken some steps to bring about improvement, these have not had the intended impact. The morale of many staff is low. Parents, carers and pupils are increasingly frustrated by the decline in behaviour and the negative impact this has on their learning.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some pupils, including a significant minority who are persistently disruptive and defiant, do not behave well. Many staff feel unsupported in managing behaviour. Often, pupils’ poor conduct disrupts learning and contributes to some pupils feeling anxious and worried. The school should implement a clear, consistent behaviour policy and ensure that all staff are supported to apply it effectively to establish a safe, respectful environment for all. 10 and 11 June 2025

p.3

4

 The school does not have a clear understanding of the specific needs of pupils with SEND. The support that they receive is inconsistent, and the separate spaces in which they work are not used well enough to provide targeted help. As a result, many pupils with SEND struggle to access learning. They do not achieve as well as they should. The school should improve its systems for identifying pupils’ need in a timely manner. It should also ensure that staff are equipped to adapt their teaching appropriately so that pupils with SEND achieve well.  The support for pupils at the earliest stages of reading is not coherently designed or delivered consistently well. The school does not have a sufficiently clear oversight of which pupils need help or how well they are progressing in building their reading knowledge. As a result, some pupils, including those with SEND, do not develop the reading fluency that they need to access the wider curriculum quickly enough. The

p.4

4

school should ensure that its early reading support is timely, targeted to pupils’ needs and closely monitored to secure rapid and sustained improvement in pupils’ reading skills.  Some pupils experience derogatory language from their peers. Often incidents are not reported. The school is not doing enough to challenge discriminatory attitudes or prevent them from happening. The school must take proactive steps to promote a culture of respect, where all pupils feel confident to report concerns and understand and demonstrate inclusion, equality and mutual respect.  Pupils’ attendance rates are low and show little sign of sustained improvement. Too many pupils are regularly absent from school, which affects their learning, their personal development and their sense of belonging. The school should develop and implement a clear, strategic approach to improving attendance. They should identify and address the barriers that stop pupils coming to school and ensure that appropriate

p.4

4

support is in place where concerns persist.

p.4

4

HMCI strongly recommends that the school does not seek to appoint early career teachers. The position regarding the appointment of early career teachers will be considered again during any monitoring inspection we carry out.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 10 and 11 June 2025

p.4

5

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 10 and 11 June 2025

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1068

p.6

School details

Dates of previous inspection 18 and 19 June 2024, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school is part of Academy Transformation Trust.  A new CEO was appointed in April 2025.  A new principal was appointed in September 2024.  A new vice principal was appointed in June 2025.  The school uses one unregistered and four registered alternative providers.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a graded (section 5) inspection under the same Act. During a 10 and 11 June 2025

p.6

7

graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.7

7

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

7

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This is the second inspection since the COVID-19 pandemic. Inspectors discussed with the leaders the current context of the school and have taken this into account in their evaluation.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, physical education, religious studies and history. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with trust staff, including the CEO of the trust, the deputy CEO, the trust director of secondary education, an executive principal and trust staff with responsibility for SEND and safeguarding. They also met with the principal and other senior staff.  An inspector met with members of the trust board, including the chair of trustees.

p.7

7

 Inspectors scrutinised documents relating to school improvement and governance, behaviour and attendance, alternative provision, enrichment, careers and pupils with SEND. They also held meetings with staff with responsibilities in these areas.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered the responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View. They also spoke to groups of pupils and took into consideration Ofsted’s online staff survey. There were no responses to Ofsted’s online pupils survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Bessie Owen, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Charlie Fordham His Majesty’s Inspector 10 and 11 June 2025

p.7

8

Claire Robins Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 June 2025

p.8

9

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

9

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

9

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

9

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

9

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion