Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Excel Residential Care Limited
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Excel Residential Care Limited
- Inspection date verified
4 Jun 2025
- Inspectors verified
Joanne Hawkins
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2727237
- URN verified
2727237
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She has an exceptional understanding of the child’s experiences, personality, needs and risks. p.4
- This has ensured a strong working approach and improved outcomes for the child. p.4
- Detailed risk assessments, which are overseen by the manager, ensure that staff are knowledgeable about effective strategies to reduce and respond to risk and behaviours. p.4
- Positive behaviour is consistently promoted. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance7
“There is a clear and consistent approach to risk management.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,293
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2727237 1 Registered provider: Excel Residential Care Limited
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This children’s home is operated by a small private company. It registered with Ofsted in May 2023. It provides care for one child who has been affected by adverse childhood experiences that have led to associated trauma and complex behaviours.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of this inspection, no children were living in the home. A child who recently moved from the home contributed to the inspection.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 12 November 2024
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2727237 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
12/11/2024 Full good 16/01/2024 Full good Inspection report for children’s home: 2727237 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The same child had been living in the home since the last inspection but had moved out a few days before the inspection. The home is empty and is undergoing redecoration in readiness to welcome a new child. The child who had been living in the home was still involved in the inspection and was able to share their views by telephone.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff have formed trusting relationships with the child. The child said, ‘This was the best place I have lived. I would rate it 6000 out of 6000.’ Staff fully understood the individual needs of the child and how best to support them. They placed the child at the centre of their practice, especially in times of crisis. The child felt safe and valued the care and support provided by staff. When the child moved on from the home, they wrote farewell letters to each member of staff to express their thanks. This demonstrates that the child felt a sense of belonging.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The chosen model of therapeutic care is clearly embedded in the home. In-house clinician support and reflective sessions with staff have helped to underpin theory to practice. This has ensured that a child-centred, consistent approach is provided by staff.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Since moving into the home, the child’s motivation to learn has significantly improved. With staff support, barriers to learning have been addressed, leading to increased engagement, exam participation and a secured place in post-16 education.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Routine health checks are attended by the child, who is supported by staff. The manager requests specialist support to meet the individual needs of the child. They advocated and continually challenged professionals to secure this on behalf of the child. During the time that the child was without specialist care, the manager ensured that the child’s needs were met through in-house therapeutic support.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child knows how to complain. When they have done so, they have received a detailed response and resolution in a timely manner. While complaints have been dealt with promptly by the manager, there is no clear recording of the steps taken to address the compliant or the action taken by the manager.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child experienced a sensitive and well-supported move, with the manager playing a key role in helping them settle into their new home. Ongoing contact has reassured the child that moving on does not mean losing important relationships, promoting a positive ending. The social worker described the move as ‘well managed’, and the family praised staff, saying they ‘couldn’t do enough’.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Managers and staff have a clear understanding of safeguarding thresholds and processes in the home. Staff understand their responsibilities and how to keep the child safe. The Inspection report for children’s home: 2727237 4 complexities of the child’s care plan have meant that staff have shown resilience and an ability to respond to fluctuating need and number of incidents. One social worker said, ‘The home welcomed [name of child], who has complex needs, in difficult circumstances. I would have no issue placing another child in their care.’
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
There is a clear and consistent approach to risk management. Detailed risk assessments, which are overseen by the manager, ensure that staff are knowledgeable about effective strategies to reduce and respond to risk and behaviours. This practice contributes to the child’s safety and promotes their welfare.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Incidents of self-harm are managed sensitively. Staff understand the risks associated with self-harm and have received additional training to ensure that they can support the child. The child’s plans effectively address the child’s vulnerabilities and set out the action that staff should take. When it has been necessary to conduct a room search following a self-harm incident, this has been done with dignity and respect and with the child’s consent.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Positive behaviour is consistently promoted. Staff recognise and reward progress and achievements for the child. Where behaviour escalated, staff would consider several strategies to de-escalate behaviour. Following incidents, staff would take time to reflect with the child to learn from the incident. Where possible, follow-on key-work sessions are completed to reinforce the relationship with the child and mitigate the risk of incidents reoccurring.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Incidents of physical restraint are managed well by staff. The use of restraint has been required to prevent the risk of self-harm and risk of harm to staff. When holds are used, they are proportionate. Holds are brief. Incident reports are detailed, timely and have clear managerial oversight. Timely debriefs take place with the child and staff.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The home environment provides a safe and secure place for the child. The home has been adapted to ensure that it continues to be a safe space when the level of need increases during times of crisis.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The home is led by a suitably qualified and child-focused registered manager. She has an exceptional understanding of the child’s experiences, personality, needs and risks. She has formed a resilient team who have been consistent in their commitment and care of the child. This means that the child has experienced care from a consistent core team of staff. When additional staff have been required, the manager has used staff from neighbouring homes in the first instance, and agency staff are only used as a last resort.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff feel supported by the manager. Managers and leaders have understood the emotional impact placed on staff when caring for the child during times of crisis. Clinical supervision has been provided. Additionally, staff can access external well-being support through their employer. Inspection report for children’s home: 2727237 5 The manager has formed effective working relationships with professionals and the child’s family. This has ensured a strong working approach and improved outcomes for the child. An example of this is with family time progressing out of the home, to the child spending quality time in the community and being able to attend family events.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager actively and regularly monitors the quality of care in the home. While monitoring systems are in place, they are not yet used consistently and effectively. This resulted in senior leaders’ oversight of reports not being visible to the manager or staff team. This means that there have been missed opportunities for learning and reflection from incidents to effectively review the progress of the home. Additionally, supervision is taking place for the manager every month, but the supervision record cannot be viewed. Inspection report for children’s home: 2727237 6
p.5
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.6
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.6
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(h)) 15 July 2025
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that a record is made of any complaint, the action taken in response, and the outcome of any investigation. (Regulation 39 (3)) 15 July 2025
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2727237 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Excel Residential Care Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 5 Rockside, Mow Cop, Stoke-on-Trent ST7 4PG
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered manager: Ariana Carreon-Palmer
p.7
Inspector
Joanne Hawkins, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2727237 8 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion