Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years compliance action

388 Streatham Hub Children's Centre

Inspected 18 Jul 2025 · URN EY423134

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Jul 2025

  • URN verified

    EY423134

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−62Very criticalmore positive than 11% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyclear
Criticismrisk of harminadequateat risknot metharmbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
565
longer than usual (typical 317)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 35
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Summary of outcome

All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at

p.1

Summary of outcome

www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 19 March 2025, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the

p.1

Summary of outcome

provider was required to take to meet the requirements.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 9 April 2025, we carried out a regulatory visit to monitor the actions set. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection. We found that the provider had taken steps to improve the sleeping arrangements. However, the remaining actions had not been met.

p.1

Summary of outcome

We suspended the provider's registration on 16 April 2025 because we believed children may be at risk of harm. Suspension allows time for the provider to take steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of harm to children. The provider has a

p.1

Summary of outcome

right to appeal against a suspension. The provider may not provide childcare for which registration is required while the suspension is in place and may commit an offence if they do so.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 22 May 2025, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of this visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection. We found the provider had not met these actions. We served a second welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out.

p.1

Summary of outcome

n ensure all staff, including the designated safeguarding leads (DSL) have an appropriate knowledge and understanding of how to respond to allegations against adults working with children

p.2

Summary of outcome

n identify learning opportunities for staff to develop their professional knowledge and understanding so they can support children's learning and development to a good level

p.2

Summary of outcome

n implement effective supervision for staff so they receive support and coaching to develop their practice; provide opportunities for staff to discuss their key children and promote the children's interests

p.2

Summary of outcome

n improve the key-person arrangements so that information about children's individual needs is used effectively to tailor the care they receive

p.2

Summary of outcome

n take action to ensure there is a suitably qualified manager or deputy who has relevant experience and knowledge to ensure the quality of care and education is of a good level

p.2

Summary of outcome

n implement appropriate behaviour management strategies that set clear expectations for children's behaviour

p.2

Summary of outcome

n improve and monitor the daily routines so children are supported to regulate their behaviour.

p.2

Summary of outcome

On 2 July 2025, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. We found the provider has responded to the actions set. The provider has taken steps to improve the safeguarding arrangements at the setting. For example, staff have undertaken additional training to improve their knowledge and understanding of child protection and strategies to manage children's behaviour. Furthermore, the provider has recruited a suitable manager with appropriate knowledge of the requirements and relevant experience.

p.2

Summary of outcome

On 7 July 2025, we lifted the suspension because the provider took appropriate action to deal with the matters that led to the suspension. We are satisfied that the identified risk of harm to children has been removed.

p.2

Summary of outcome

The provider is still registered with Ofsted.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion