Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Park Lane Academy

Inspected 8 May 2025 · published 18 Jul 2025 · URN 143115

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Richard Jones (lead), Vicky Callaghan, Yvonne Bootman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 May 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Richard Jones, Vicky Callaghan, Yvonne Bootman

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    HX3 9LG

  • Name on report verified

    Park Lane Academy

  • URN verified

    143115

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 27% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovedpositivethriveambitiousstronghappypolite
Criticisminconsistentgapstoo fewinconsistenciesnot alwaysnot strongvariablenot improved

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1265w+31
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,245
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Park Lane Academy Park Lane, Exley, Halifax, West Yorkshire HX3 9LG

p.1

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

The principal of this school is Stuart Hillary. This school is part of the South Pennines Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Alison Black, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Lisa Fathers. There is also an executive headteacher, Kash Rafiq, who is responsible for this school and two others. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders are ambitious for pupils to behave and achieve well. However, the expectations for pupils’ achievement have not been realised, as reflected in published outcomes since the last inspection. Too few pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, make expected rates of progress by the end of key stage 4. Over time, the proportion of pupils obtaining GCSE qualifications in a range of subjects, including English and mathematics, has remained very low.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have improved the standards of behaviour since the previous inspection. Pupils benefit from calm, settled classrooms, where routines are well embedded. Positive relationships between pupils and staff are commonplace. Pupils attend school regularly. Pupils are happy, polite and respectful. Bullying is rare, and pupils feel safe at school. They have access to trusted adults, who provide guidance and reassurance when matters arise.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ wider development is well supported through the school’s personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education programme. A range of extra-curricular opportunities are on offer. Pupil leadership roles are both popular and active. Pupils receive appropriate career advice. Nevertheless, many leave school without a sufficient range of qualifications to ensure that they have a broad range of options for the next stage of education, training or employment.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has not secured improved outcomes by the end of key stage 4, despite the recent implementation of strategies to improve the quality of education. In 2024, for example, the proportion of pupils securing passes in GCSE English and mathematics was approximately half the national and local average.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has ensured that pupils benefit from accessing a broad curriculum. They study a range of subjects in line with the ambition of the national curriculum.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have carefully considered curriculum design. In some subjects, staff typically use their expertise to implement the curriculum effectively. However, inconsistencies in curriculum implementation persist in other subjects, due to variations in approach.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has implemented an appropriate programme to support pupils who are not fluent readers. While some of this work is new, it has gained traction rapidly, ensuring that most pupils who need appropriate help receive it.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Since the last inspection, much work has taken place to strengthen the quality of the school’s offer to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). There are some signs of improvement. However, this work remains unfinished. While pupils with SEND are clearly identified, some staff are not using the information to support pupils’ acquisition of knowledge effectively to help these pupils to achieve well. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.2

3

The quality of the work that pupils produce in lessons is showing early signs of improvement. Nevertheless, the tasks they are given do not always match the goals of the school’s intended curriculum. Teachers’ checks on pupils’ learning were an issue identified at the last inspection. This remains inconsistent. This hinders the progress that pupils make in their learning.

p.3

3

Leaders have successfully improved the day-to-day standards of behaviour. Pupils behave well throughout the school and demonstrate positive attitudes towards their learning. They attend school regularly and leaders support those whose attendance dips.

p.3

3

Pupils receive strong support in their wider development. The school has an appropriate PSHE programme in place. Pupils learn about the risks they may face in life, as well as covering statutory topics, such as relationships and sex education. The school has a broad offer of extra-curricular opportunities for pupils to take part in. The elected pupil ‘Prime Minister’ plays a crucial role in making decisions that impact pupil life at school. Trips and clubs, such as visits to the coast, are popular.

p.3

3

Pupils receive appropriate careers guidance, which starts in Year 7. They gain valuable insights by attending apprenticeship and alumni days. Pupils receive support in understanding recruitment processes, such as through participation in mock interviews.

p.3

3

Leaders, including those from the trust, know the school well. They are committed to its long-term success. They are aware that academic outcomes must improve and have begun to support and challenge leaders in this regard. Leaders have the necessary capacity to further improve the school and have already achieved success in key areas. Notably, they have improved the standards of behaviour and enhanced the provision for pupils’ personal development. Early signs of progress are evident in their efforts to improve the quality of education.

p.3

3

Staff recognise the improvements already made at the school. They say that leaders are mindful of their workload and well-being. Staff told inspectors that they enjoy working at the school and are supported well by senior leaders.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Over time, pupils have not achieved the qualifications that they are capable of attaining in external assessments, such as GCSEs. This reduces pupils’ options when moving on to the next step in education, training or employment. The school should improve the quality of education offered for pupils throughout key stages 3 and 4, to ensure that pupils receive the support needed to achieve better academic outcomes. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.3

4

 The quality of the implementation and delivery of subject curriculums is variable. As a result, pupils do not learn as well as they should. The academic progress they make is not as strong as it should be. The school should further develop staff subject expertise so that the intended subject curriculums are delivered consistently well.  The school’s inconsistent approach to assessment is not supporting pupils to make the intended progress. This means that some pupils have unidentified gaps in learning that are not addressed or resolved before starting new subject content. The school should ensure that assessment is linked to the content taught and is used effectively to identify and close gaps in pupils’ learning.  Some staff do not fully use the information provided to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. This means that, on occasion, pupils with SEND are not fully supported to access and understand the important knowledge content. The school should ensure

p.4

4

that staff use the precise information shared about each pupil with SEND effectively to allow these pupils to access learning fully and thrive.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 7 and 8 May 2025

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 4 and 5 October 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the South Pennines Academies Trust.  The school currently does not use any alterative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.5

6

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.6

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The lead inspector met with the CEO, trustees and the chair of the local governing body.  Inspectors met with senior and middle leaders, including those responsible for safeguarding, personal development, careers, attendance and behaviour.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, history, modern foreign languages and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors looked at a range of information regarding behaviour. Inspectors observed the behaviour of pupils at social times.

p.6

6

 Inspectors spoke with pupils and staff formally and informally throughout the inspection. Responses to Ofsted’s surveys for staff, pupils and parents were considered by the inspection team.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

Inspection team

Richard Jones, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Vicky Callaghan Ofsted Inspector 7 and 8 May 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion