Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Yetev Lev D'Satmar Nursery 122 Cazenove Branch

Inspected 17 Jun 2025 · published 17 Jul 2025 · URN 2747726

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Nelam Pooni (lead), Agnes Wink

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date AI-checked

    17 Jun 2025

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Agnes Wink, Nelam Pooni

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    N16 6AX

  • Name on report verified

    Yetev Lev D'Satmar Nursery 122 Cazenove Branch

  • URN verified

    2747726

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−10Mixedmore positive than 80% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiousgood progresspositivehigh qualityweakhappyenjoysafe
Criticismnot effectivelackweaknessesnot consistentlyfailnot high expectationsnot sufficientlydisruptive

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings947w−41
  • Safeguarding205w+80

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,116
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 51
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 1
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Safeguarding 12%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Yetev Lev D'Satmar Nursery 122 Cazenove Branch 122 Cazenove Road, London, United Kingdom N16 6AX

p.1

Inspection date: 17 June 2025 - 18 June 2025

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Staff welcome children warmly into the nursery, this helps them to settle. However, leaders repeatedly fail to ensure that all children are receiving good levels of learning. Leaders do not quickly address weak teaching, learning and practice from staff, this results in all children not making the progress they are capable of. Overall, children arrive happy and smile, when greeted by staff and their friends. Staff plan general activities based on what all the children like to do. For example, staff provide play dough and construction for children to play with. Children are expected to spend a lot of time playing with these and staff do not engage, excite or challenge them. There is no consideration for individual learning and next steps of development. Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum is ambitious and challenging for all children including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Leaders and staff do not have high expectations of children and as a result children do not behave well. Children step over and kick toys and resources out of the way instead of picking them up or moving them. Due to the lack of focussed activities children become bored and restless and begin to display behaviours such as pushing and snatching. These behaviours are not addressed consistently by staff. Children enjoy their time playing outdoors, rolling hoops and throwing balls to one another. Staff try their best to interact with children encouraging them to balance and ride bikes. However, this is not consistent and not to a good level.

p.2

need to do better?

n Leaders have taken steps to address actions linked to promoting the safety of the children, for example staff have attended training linked to child protection and have reviewed risk assessments to support children to be safe at the nursery. However, leaders have not sufficiently addressed weaknesses identified on the quality of education, this has an impact on children's individual progress. These weaknesses have been identified at previous inspections. n Leaders have implemented supervision arrangements to identify weaknesses and areas of development in staff teaching and practice. This has had some impact on supporting children to be safe in the nursery. However, it has not been effective in ensuring that the quality of education is delivered to a good level for all children. n Staff carry out observations of the children and use this information to plan activities. However, these activities tend to be general activities based around

p.2

need to do better?

what all children like to do. Staff do not plan activities based on what children know and can do, therefore there is not individual and meaningful learning taking place for all children. n Interactions between staff and children are not at a good level, often, staff

p.2

need to do better?

17 June 2025 supervise children in their play rather than engaging with them in a meaningful way. In addition, staffing arrangements are not effective. For example, some staff working with children do not know relevant information about children's needs. They lack the knowledge and skills to implement individualised learning for children; this does not support all children to make best possible or good progress in their learning and development. n Staff do not help children to understand the rules and expectations of the setting. They do not act consistently when they see children pushing or snatching from one another. Staff often raise their voices to manage children's behaviour when the environment becomes noisy and disruptive. This impacts on children's attitudes to their learning as they are not able to remain focussed. n Staff communicate with children in Yiddish for most of the time. Since the last

p.2

need to do better?

inspection, leaders have introduced adding the English language to daily routines, activities and through reading stories to children. However, this is not done consistently, therefore it does not enable children to reach a good standard of English. n Key persons get to know children through observations and interacting with them. Children seek comfort when they need reassurance. However, key persons do not seek and use information to support children on their educational journey. Information is sought from parents when children first start but this is not continuous. This impacts on supporting children's learning and how their individual needs are met. n Children have some opportunities to develop their independence skills through supporting their own self- care, for example washing hands and using the toilet independently. However, these opportunities are not continuous, and the teaching and learning children receive to support these skills are not at a good

p.3

need to do better?

level. For example, at mealtimes children are served food and water. This limits the skills children are able to learn, to make decisions about how much and what they want to eat and drink. n Parents drop children off at the main entrance, some parents have discussions with staff about their children. Leaders have not implemented an effective partnership with parents where information about what children have done throughout the day is shared, their development and next steps for learning. This means that parents are not fully aware of what their children are learning and how they are developing at the nursery to fully support their learning at home. n Children with SEND are not supported to a good level. Leaders are aware of individual targets designed to specifically support children to make progress at nursery. However, this information is not well communicated to staff working with these children to ensure positive outcomes for all children.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.3

Due date

improve supervision arrangements to ensure that areas for development of staff are quickly addressed to have a positive impact on children's learning 02/07/2025

p.4

Due date

improve the relationship of the key person to ensure children's individual development and learning needs are met 02/07/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure staffing arrangements meet the individual learning and care needs of children 02/07/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure that all staff manage children's behaviour in an appropriate consistent way 02/07/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure strategies recommended by professionals are known and implemented by all staff working with children. 02/07/2025

p.4

Due date

implement an ambitious curriculum which builds on what children know, can do and what they need to learn next to enable all children to make best possible or good progress 30/07/2025

p.4

Due date

provide more opportunities for child to learn English and reach a good standard of English 30/07/2025

p.4

Due date

17 June 2025 improve interactions between staff and children to ensure they are at a high quality to ensure all children are engaged in their learning 30/07/2025

p.4

Due date

set up a system where there is two- way flow of information between key person and parents so information about children is shared on a regular bases. 30/07/2025

p.5

Setting details

Unique reference number 2747726 Local authority Hackney Inspection number 10390392 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.6

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care

p.6

inspection

Total number of places 490 Number of children on roll 243 Name of registered person Satmar Nursery Trust

p.6

reference number

Telephone number 02088062598 Date of previous inspection 7 January 2025

p.6

Information about this early years setting

Yetev Lev D'Satmar Nursery 122 Cazenove Branch registered in 2023. It is located in the London Borough of Hackney. The setting operates from 9am to 3pm, Monday to Thursday. On Friday, it operates from 9am to 12.30pm during the summer, and from 9am to 11.30pm during the winter. The setting is closed on Saturday. On Sunday, the setting operates from 9.30am to 3pm during the summer, and 9am to 3pm during the winter. The setting employs 39 staff who work with the children. One member of staff holds qualified teacher status, three staff hold childcare qualifications at level 3, and four members of staff are qualified at level 2. Children aged three to five years attend this setting. The setting provides funded early education for three- and four-year-old children.

p.6

Inspection activities

n The manager led the inspectors on a learning walk and told the inspector about what they want children to learn at nursery. n The inspectors viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The manager, leaders and inspectors carried out a joint observation. They looked at how well practitioners teach and what they want children to learn. n Staff, leaders and the manager spoke to the inspectors throughout the day. n The inspectors observed children at play in the nursery. n The inspectors spoke with parents and gathered their views about their experiences of the setting. n Children spoke to the inspectors during the inspection. n The inspectors looked at documentation relating to the suitability of those working with children, such as evidence of first-aid training and Disclosure and Barring Service checks.

p.7

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.7

Inspection activities

17 June 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.8

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion