Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Spring Common Academy

Inspected 18 Jun 2025 · published 14 Jul 2025 · URN 142557

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Daniel Short (lead), Caroline Dawes, Catherine Assink

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Jun 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Caroline Dawes, Catherine Assink, Daniel Short

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    PE29 1TQ

  • Name on report verified

    Spring Common Academy

  • URN verified

    142557

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveambitiouseffectivelyeffectiveenjoyhigh-qualityoutstandinghigh expectations
Criticismlacknot consistentlynot alwayslacksgapsweaknessesshortcomingsinconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1502w+35
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,477
longer than usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Spring Common Academy American Lane, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE29 1TQ

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Rebecca Greig. This school is part of Horizons Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the interim chief executive officer (CEO), Jane Nolan, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Julie Perry.

p.1

Ofsted has not previously inspected Spring Common Academy under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. However, Ofsted previously judged Spring Common School to be outstanding for overall effectiveness, before it opened as Spring Common Academy as a result of conversion to academy status. The school received an ungraded inspection under section 8 of the Act on 8 and 9 May 2024. Since September 2024, schools have not been awarded an overall effectiveness grade. 17 and 18 June 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are at the heart of the school in many important ways, even though their daily experiences are not consistent. Many enjoy warm, caring relationships with staff and with each other. Smiles remain a common feature of daily life, especially in the playground and during shared activities such as the school council. Pupils from different age groups often get along well. These positive relationships extend beyond school, such as through the exchange programme with a school in Belgium.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is not, however, a shared view across the school of what high expectations should look like in different subjects and phases. Because of this, pupils’ experiences in lessons and around school vary. Although they make progress, including many going on to attend college, more needs to be done to ensure that all pupils benefit from a consistently ambitious and well-delivered curriculum.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Behaviour in school is usually calm. Most pupils respond well to the routines and expectations set by staff. Positive behaviour and effort are regularly celebrated, for example through the popular ‘shout-outs’ in assemblies that recognise pupils’ achievements. Attendance is also encouraged and rewarded, with the termly treasure hunt proving a fun and motivating way to promote good habits.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Trust and school leaders are working together to tackle the considerable challenges and changes the school has recently faced. They have introduced more effective policies, procedures and systems. These are improving pupils’ attendance, behaviour and sense of safety. The trust and school share a clear commitment to improve pupils’ experiences. Staff form positive relationships with pupils. This helps pupils to stay focused and engaged. More pupils now attend school regularly. However, oversight of the quality of education has not been robust enough.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum has some strengths. In certain areas, such as hydrotherapy and swimming, the school uses sensory and practical methods effectively. Pupils progress well in these sessions, which have clear steps to support learning. However, the curriculum is not clear in other areas, including the early years and in the sixth form. This results in pupils completing tasks that are too easy or lack purpose. They offer limited opportunity to build on what they already know and can do.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Following the last inspection, the school invested in high-quality equipment for the early years. However, these resources are not used to their full potential. The school has not provided staff with enough guidance on how best to use this equipment to support children’s learning. Consequently, the resources do not consistently promote the development of key language, movement or play skills.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Effective checks are carried out in sessions that aim to improve attention, engagement and interaction. Staff use their voice and resources effectively to help pupils to refocus. This helps pupils build self-control and stay engaged. However, the school does not 17 and 18 June 2025

p.2

3

always make clear what specific knowledge pupils should have at given points. This leads to checks that are too broad. As a result, gaps in understanding are sometimes missed. This slows the progress that pupils make.

p.3

3

Pupils take part in regular reading sessions. They usually enjoy listening to stories, particularly when the school uses props, lights and sounds to enhance storytelling. The school follows a structured phonics programme. However, the teaching of reading is not consistently effective. Some activities do little to help pupils practise and consolidate the sounds they have learned. The school does not evaluate the teaching of reading well enough to identify weaknesses or to provide the support needed to improve practice. For example, pupils are not always given books that match the sounds they know. Some stay on the same book for too long. They end up memorising the story instead of practising reading skills, which hinders their achievement.

p.3

3

The school strongly advocates for its pupils, all of whom have special educational needs and/or disabilities. For example, the school ensures that pupils receive the right medical support. It works effectively with health professionals to help pupils feel comfortable and well enough to attend school. Some external support, including from occupational therapists and mental health professionals, is working well. While there are shortcomings in the curriculum, teaching and assessment, this support helps the school maintain effective practice in meeting pupils’ additional needs.

p.3

3

Pupils enjoy activities that broaden their experiences. These include careers events and volunteering in shops and schools. These opportunities help pupils build confidence and prepare for the future. However, the personal development programme is weakened by inconsistent communication support. The school is not consistent in how it guides pupils to use speech or signing to express themselves independently.

p.3

3

Governance is improving. Trustees are shifting from operational oversight towards a more strategic role. Recent appointments in safeguarding, education and finance indicate a focus on long-term improvement. Trustees are becoming more confident in setting priorities and establishing systems that support school improvement. Some school improvement actions are still recent, but there is clear momentum and a stronger foundation for further progress.

p.3

3

The school shows care for pupils, families and staff. Leaders are approachable. Most staff feel well supported and positive about their workload. Parents and carers largely value the care their children receive. Despite occasional communication issues, such as how the school reports on pupils’ progress, the generally positive relationships put the school in a positive position to manage further improvements.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 17 and 18 June 2025

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s curriculum does not define and sequence the knowledge, vocabulary, concepts and skills that pupils should learn. In the early years, staff lack sufficient guidance on how to use recently purchased high-quality equipment effectively. As a result, pupils may repeat content unnecessarily or encounter concepts in an order that does not support secure understanding. It also makes it more difficult for teachers to assess pupils’ learning accurately and to address any gaps. The school should refine the curriculum and improve staff guidance, so that learning is ambitious, well sequenced and effectively supported for all pupils.  The current approach to phonics lacks structure and consistency. Some activities and resources are not matched to pupils’ assessed stages of development. This weakens pupils’ ability to develop secure decoding skills and slows their early reading progress. The school should ensure that its phonics programme, associated resources and

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

assessment systems work together to provide a coherent, consistent and ambitious offer for pupils.  The school’s agreed approaches to communication are not used with consistency or precision. This hinders pupils’ ability to understand and express themselves, which not only limits their access to learning but also affects their confidence and independence. The school should ensure that all staff are trained, supported and held to account for implementing communication strategies consistently, as an essential part of promoting pupils’ personal development.  Curriculum leadership lacks the clarity and subject knowledge needed to support consistent and ambitious teaching. Staff do not always receive the guidance or professional development they need to deliver subject content effectively or adapt it for pupils’ diverse needs. The school should ensure that those overseeing the curriculum are well equipped to develop curriculum thinking, offer practical support and guide

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

improvements in teaching across the school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 17 and 18 June 2025

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 17 and 18 June 2025

p.5

School details

School category Academy special converter

p.6

form

CEO of the trust Jane Nolan (Interim CEO)

p.6

form

Dates of previous inspection 8 and 9 May 2024, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 All pupils have an education, health and care plan. Many have autism or severe learning difficulties, while a smaller number have profound and multiple learning disabilities.  Since the last inspection, there has been a change in leadership within the trust. The chair of the trust and the interim CEO have been in post for less than a year. During their tenure, the central trust team has been expanded to include directors responsible for education, finance and safeguarding.  The school’s leadership team, including the headteacher, has been in post for the past 18 months or less.  The school currently engages the services of two unregistered alternative providers. 17 and 18 June 2025

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with a range of leaders, including the chair of the trust, the interim CEO, the director of education, the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the assistant headteachers and four members of the academy advisory group.  Inspectors conducted deep dives in the following subjects: early reading, communication, mathematics, life skills, physical education, and physical development. For each deep dive, they met with leaders to discuss the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers and held discussions with pupils about their learning and broader school experience. Staff were present during pupil discussions to help pupils feel at ease and to support their ability to communicate about their education

p.7

Information about this inspection

and school life. Inspectors also reviewed samples of pupils’ work and listened to a selection of pupils reading to a familiar adult.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors reviewed school documentation, including the school’s development plan, minutes of meetings of the trust board and minutes of meetings of the academy advisory group.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s staff and parent surveys, including free- text comments submitted via Ofsted Parent View.

p.7

Inspection team

Daniel Short, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Caroline Dawes Ofsted Inspector 17 and 18 June 2025

p.7

8

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion