Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Burlescombe Church of England Primary School

Inspected 19 Jun 2025 · published 14 Jul 2025 · URN 149055

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Gentile (lead), Julie Barton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jun 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    James Gentile, Julie Barton

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    EX16 7JH

  • Name on report verified

    Burlescombe Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    149055

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivestrongwarmstrengthambitiousproudcaringrigorous
Criticismweaknesseslacknot sufficientlydo not knowconcerntoo oftenlacksnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1196w+6
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,174
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of Burlescombe Church of England Primary School Station Road, Burlescombe, Tiverton, Devon EX16 7JH

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good

p.1

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Carys Barnett. This school is part of the Alumnis Multi- Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is currently being run by acting co-leaders Rachael Sharpe and Mark Blackman and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Sian Jenkins. 18 and 19 June 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud of their village school. Their positive behaviour reflects the school’s values of responsibility and respect. Pupils are safe. They value the warm and caring relationships they have with adults at the school. They know there is a trusted adult they can speak to if they have a concern.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is a renewed sense of ambition of what pupils can achieve with the recent appointment of a substantive headteacher. However, pupils have not learned the important knowledge that they need to be ready for the next stage of their education. This means pupils do not achieve as well as they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils build their confidence through opportunities the school provides, such as speaking as an ‘inspiring speaker’ during assembly. They also grow as ‘inspiring young leaders’ by taking on roles of responsibility such as school councillors. Pupils explain how voting for their school councillor helps them to build an understanding of British values such as democracy.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils appreciate the residential trips to outdoor education centres. They learn new skills such as paddle boarding and orienteering. These trips help pupils to build independence and resilience. The wide range of competitive sporting activities helps to develop their talents and interests.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has come out of a period of turbulence, which has included long periods without a substantive headteacher. The very recent appointment of the new headteacher has been welcomed by pupils and the school community. The headteacher, with support from newly appointed highly experienced trustees and new members of the ‘local school committee’, has quickly identified what the school needs to do to improve. However, the school’s steps to rectify weaknesses are in their early days and have not had the impact that they need to.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has ensured that reading remains central to pupils’ learning. The teaching of phonics is a strength of the school. The systems and processes that support early reading are rigorous and robust. This means that pupils learn the phonics sounds that they need to know to become confident and fluent readers. Published outcomes show that all pupils in Year 1 passed their phonics screening check.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

However, other areas of the curriculum lack appropriate rigour. The school has not set out the essential knowledge that it wants pupils to know and remember. This means that sometimes teachers do not know which knowledge to emphasise and revisit. As a result, pupils are not able to recall what they have learned in the past or to make connections in their learning. 18 and 19 June 2025

p.2

3

Furthermore, the checks on what pupils know and understand lack precision. Pupils are not provided with effective feedback to help them to improve in their learning. Too often, teachers design tasks that do not take into account what pupils already know and can do. This also means that the work some pupils complete lacks ambition, while other pupils do not have the foundational knowledge to be successful in their learning.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) experience the same weaknesses in the quality of education as their peers. While leaders are quick to identify the needs of pupils with SEND, the targets teachers set for pupils with SEND are not sufficiently precise. This means that pupils with SEND are not routinely supported appropriately and do not achieve as well as they should.

p.3

3

Children in the early years get off to a secure start. The early years environment is a warm and inviting space for pupils to learn. The strong focus on learning reading, writing and mathematics skills from the time they start school is balanced with supporting children to develop a love of the outdoors. This helps children to quickly establish positive attitudes to learning.

p.3

3

The provision for pupils’ personal development is a strength of the school. Pupils understand how to keep safe online. They learn about beliefs different to their own. Pupils have the opportunity to visit London, the zoo and the local coastline. These visits are linked to what the pupils are learning to help bring the curriculum alive.

p.3

3

Pupils across the school behave well. There is a strong sense of mutual care and respect between pupils of different ages. Older pupils actively model positive behaviour for younger pupils and make a conscious effort to set a good example. Pupils enjoy coming to school and this is reflected through high rates of attendance.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school has not identified the essential knowledge that pupils need to know. This means that sometimes teachers do not know which knowledge to emphasise and revisit. As a result, pupils do not consistently recall and make connections in their learning. The school should identify the essential knowledge pupils need to remember over time, so teachers know which content to focus on to build pupils’ knowledge well.  The school does not use assessment effectively enough to check what pupils know and remember. Teachers do not design tasks which are ambitious or take into account what pupils already know and can do. This means pupils do not build knowledge securely. 18 and 19 June 2025

p.3

4

The school needs to ensure that teachers use assessment effectively to check pupils’ understanding and design tasks that help pupils to know more over time.  The targets that teachers set for pupils with SEND are not sufficiently accurate. This means that pupils with SEND do not receive the support that they need to access the curriculum well. The school and trust need to ensure that staff have accurate and informative plans for pupils with SEND so that pupils receive the support that they need in a timely manner.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 18 and 19 June 2025

p.4

School details

Acting co-leaders of the trust Rachel Sharpe and Mark Blackman

p.5

School details

Date(s) of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher took up their post in April 2025.  The school is part of Alumnis Multi-Academy Trust.  The school does not currently use any alternative provision.  The school is a Church of England School in the Diocese of Exeter. The most recent section 48 inspection for schools of a religious character took place in April 2019.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspector(s) carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 18 and 19 June 2025

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school's education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, the inspectors discussed the curriculum with teachers, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and geography. For each deep dive, the inspectors discussed the curriculum with teachers, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single

p.6

6

central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspectors met with the headteacher, members of the trust leadership team, members of the school’s senior leadership team, the special educational needs coordinator, trustees, subject leaders, and members of the local schools committee.  The inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site.  The inspectors gathered parents’ views by considering the responses to Ofsted Parent View and by talking to parents. The inspectors also reviewed responses to Ofsted’s online staff and pupil surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

James Gentile, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Julie Barton Ofsted Inspector 18 and 19 June 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion