Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Protea Care Limited in Lincolnshire
Summary
Chloe Harvey (lead), Lorna Walker
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Protea Care Limited
- Inspection date verified
5 Jun 2025
- Inspectors verified
Chloe Harvey, Lorna Walker
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2804494
- URN verified
2804494
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person should ensure that the behaviour management strategy is understood and applied at all times by staff, and is kept under review and revised where appropriate. p.5
- This specifically relates to ensuring that staff’s responses to children’s behaviour are consistently in line with the child’s individual support plan. p.5
- The registered person should monitor and review the patterns and trends of turnover of staff, whether agency or directly employed, and be able to understand and, where possible, address any negative trends. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,127
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2804494 1 Registered provider: Protea Care Limited
p.1
Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is owned and managed by a private company. It offers care for up to two children who may experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
There has been no registered manager since 23 April 2025. A manager has applied to register with Ofsted.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of the inspection, two children were living in the home and contributed to the inspection.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: not previously inspected
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for children’s home: 2804494 2
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children have made progress from their starting points. Staff support children to have positive experiences, which have included children taking part in activities that they have felt unable to do previously. This has helped to raise children’s self-esteem.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff understand children’s needs and associated risks. Positive relationships between staff and children are evident, with children able to identify trusted staff they can talk to. Open and positive discussions between staff and children have encouraged children to express their views and engage in direct support.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children attend school regularly. The new manager and staff have developed positive working relationships with staff at children’s education settings which has improved children’s willingness to attend school and learn.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff ensure that children’s health needs are appropriately met. There has been improvement in children taking their prescribed medication consistently. Additionally, children are attending health appointments which they had previously missed, contributing to better overall health outcomes.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff ensure that children see their families and other people who are important to them. The manager and staff have established positive relationships with children’s families and take children to family time and supervise where appropriate.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children’s individual identities are actively supported. Staff encourage children to explore and express their identity in a safe and supportive environment.
p.2
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The quality of children’s risk assessments and support plans has improved under the new manager’s supervision. Support plans are clear, detailed and tailored to reflect children’s individual needs and associated risks. Staff understand these risks and the areas where children require additional support.
p.2
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff respond appropriately to incidents of children going missing or being absent from home, involving the police when necessary to ensure children’s safety. Managers and staff understand and follow procedures for responding to allegations, ensuring effective safeguards are in place to protect both children and staff.
p.2
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff engage children in reflective discussions following incidents. Staff also revisit these conversations to reinforce strategies that help children to keep themselves safe. Consequences used by staff to support positive behaviour are appropriate, and children are supported to understand the reasons behind these measures. Inspection report for children’s home: 2804494 3 Staff use physical intervention appropriately and proportionately. However, this approach has not always been effective in de-escalating incidents. Staff record incidents of physical intervention; however, management oversight has not always been recorded or evaluated the intervention used. In addition, behaviour de-escalation techniques individual to children’s plans have not been consistently applied by all staff, which has at times contributed to the escalation of incidents.
p.2
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The manager has identified areas for development in staff’s approach to responding to children’s behaviour and actively addressing the issues. This has seen a positive change in staff responding to children in a more therapeutic manner, aligned with their individual support plans. This has led to a significant decrease in the frequency and severity of incidents for both children.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager demonstrates a clear awareness of the identified shortfalls in practice. She is actively addressing these areas to improve overall practice and outcomes for children.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff say they have positive support from the manager and their colleagues. Regular supervision sessions are held, with additional supervision provided when concerns arise regarding staff practice. Team meetings are held regularly and provide staff with opportunities to reflect on and develop their practice.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Since the manager’s appointment, there have been improvements in staff practice and their responses to children’s behaviours. However, this remains a work in progress, with further development required to fully embed these changes.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Management oversight of incidents has at times been inconsistent, with a lack of thorough evaluation of the interventions used.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The service has experienced staff turnover during this period, which has impacted the stability of both the team and the children they support. The use of agency staff has been monitored by the manager, who has ensured that children have been cared for by a consistent team of adults.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers acknowledge the areas identified for improvement and are beginning to address these. Inspection report for children’s home: 2804494 4
p.3
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.4
Requirement Due date
within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes—
p.4
Requirement Due date
details of the child’s behaviour leading to the use of the measure;
p.4
Requirement Due date
the date, time and location of the use of the measure;
p.4
Requirement Due date
a description of the measure and its duration;
p.4
Requirement Due date
details of any methods used or steps taken to avoid the need to use the measure;
p.4
Requirement Due date
the name of the person who used the measure ("the user"), and of any other person present when the measure was used;
p.4
Requirement Due date
the effectiveness and any consequences of the use of the measure; and
p.4
Requirement Due date
a description of any injury to the child or any other person, and any medical treatment administered, as a result of the measure;
p.4
Requirement Due date
within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so ("the authorised person")—
p.4
Requirement Due date
has spoken to the user about the measure; and
p.4
Requirement Due date
has signed the record to confirm it is accurate; and 3 July 2025 Inspection report for children’s home: 2804494 5 within 5 days of the use of the measure, the registered person or the authorised person adds to the record confirmation that they have spoken to the child about the measure. (Regulation 35 (3)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(vii)(viii)(b)(i)(ii)(c)(iv))
p.4
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that the behaviour management strategy is understood and applied at all times by staff, and is kept under review and revised where appropriate. This specifically relates to ensuring that staff’s responses to children’s behaviour are consistently in line with the child’s individual support plan. (‘Guide to the Children’s Home Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 46, paragraph 9.34) The registered person should monitor and review the patterns and trends of turnover of staff, whether agency or directly employed, and be able to understand and, where possible, address any negative trends. (‘Guide to the Children’s Home Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 54, paragraph 10.19)
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2804494 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Protea Care Limited
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Howard Roth & Co, 317 Horn Lane, London W3 0BU
p.6
Inspectors
Chloe Harvey, Social Care Inspector Lorna Walker, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2804494 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion