Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by First Blue Healthcare Limited in Staffordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
First Blue Healthcare Limited
- Inspection date verified
28 May 2025
- Inspectors verified
John Tomlinson
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2591708
- URN verified
2591708
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2025.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The child enjoys positive relationships with staff, which contributes to their enjoyment of the home, with them scoring it nine out of 10. p.3
- They are better able to express their feelings in positive ways, incidents of them going missing have reduced and their engagement with education has improved. p.3
- The outstanding actions are now set to be addressed. p.3
- Leaders and managers are skilled at building positive working relationships with partner agencies and the child’s family. p.4
- As a result, staff feel well supported and the child is cared for by staff who are knowledgeable and motivated. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When there has not been agreement and the manager has continued to have concerns about the online safety of the child, it is not always clear that they have escalated their concerns. p.4
- On one occasion, they failed to notify the regulator of a serious incident. p.4
- The responsibility for this delay does not sit with the manager or staff, however, it was not clear that the manager challenged the local authority or partner agencies to prevent drift and delay for the child. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular, ensure that staff demonstrate professional curiosity and take appropriate action when a child raises concerns about other children outside of the home. 30 August 2025 p.6
- In particular, this relates to the manager appropriately challenging the placing authority or partner agencies to prevent delay in a child receiving support, or when they feel plans do not appropriately safeguard children. p.7
- The registered person should notify Ofsted and other relevant persons if one of the situations specified in regulation 40(4)(a)-(d) occurs, or if there is an incident relating to the protection, safeguarding or welfare of a child living in the home which the registered person considers to be serious. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes3
“As a result, the child is making good progress from their starting points.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,546
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 1 Registered provider: First Blue Healthcare Limited
p.1
Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is owned by a private organisation and is registered to provide care for up to three children who may be experiencing social and emotional difficulties. At the time of this inspection, one child was living in the home and spoke with the inspectors.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The registered manager post has been vacant since November 2024. A new manager started work in December 2024 and has applied to register with Ofsted.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 14 January 2025
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
14/01/2025 Full Requires improvement to be good 14/11/2023 Full Good 16/11/2022 Full Outstanding 21/03/2022 Interim Improved effectiveness Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Since the last inspection, the same child has remained living in the home. The home is welcoming and well presented. Communal areas offer the child large, comfortable spaces in which to relax and enjoy themselves. The child’s bedroom is highly personalised, with photos of people who are important to them and pictures of their favourite football players.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child enjoys positive relationships with staff, which contributes to their enjoyment of the home, with them scoring it nine out of 10. Staff work hard to build these relationships. They have important conversations with the child to help them be safer and healthier, and to promote their education and independence. As a result, the child is making good progress from their starting points. They are better able to express their feelings in positive ways, incidents of them going missing have reduced and their engagement with education has improved.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child’s education is a priority. Leaders and managers have strongly advocated for the child, to overcome barriers to education. When the child’s school sought to suspend them, the manager challenged this effectively, working in partnership with the school to identify an alternative approach which better supported the child’s learning. As a result, the child’s attendance and engagement in school have improved dramatically. They recently completed their first term without any unauthorised absences. The child said that they love school. Such improvements in engagement and attendance are enhancing the child’s life experiences.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child enjoys a range of activities of their choosing. They have sleepovers with friends, go on walks, play pool, volunteer with animals and engage in fundraising for charity. Recently, the child and staff baked cakes and hosted a coffee morning, raising over £200 for a charity supporting people who have cancer and their families. These experiences support the child to develop new skills, make friends and build positive memories.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child receives individualised care and they have a range of ways to shape the care they receive. Staff actively seek the child’s views and, where appropriate and possible, act on them. As a result, the child feels listened to, and said that staff in the home help them. However, there has been a delay in achieving actions set out in the child’s plans. The responsibility for this delay does not sit with the manager or staff, however, it was not clear that the manager challenged the local authority or partner agencies to prevent drift and delay for the child. The outstanding actions are now set to be addressed. However, the child has experienced delay in being supported with a medical condition and in receiving support to help them understand their life experiences. Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 4
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The child feels safe. Safeguarding incidents are rare because staff have good relationships with the child and the child enjoys living in the home. Since the last inspection, there have not been any incidents of staff having to physically intervene to keep the child or others safe, and incidents of the child going missing are reducing. When the child goes missing, staff follow their plans and work effectively with partner agencies to ensure that the child is returned home safely.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The child’s achievements and positive behaviour are celebrated and encouraged, using frequent rewards. Consequences are used as a last resort and are proportionate to the behaviours they seek to discourage. The manager has good oversight of the use of consequences, and the child is given the opportunity to reflect and comment on their use, as well as opportunities to repair relationships. This supports the child’s learning, while also helping them to feel safe and listened to.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The manager informs the regulator of most reportable incidents. On one occasion, they failed to notify the regulator of a serious incident. Appropriate action was taken to ensure the child’s safety and to address the issues leading to this incident. However, the lack of notification reduces the regulator’s ability to have effective oversight.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
At times, staff have not shown appropriate professional curiosity in relation to the child expressing concerns about their friends engaging in risky or harmful behaviours. Staff have missed opportunities to safeguard children outside of the home, and to reduce the emotional burden for the child, who feels responsible for keeping their friends safe.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Online safety is a focus in the home. While leaders and managers strive to implement strategies to promote online safety, there has not always been agreement between the home’s leaders and managers and the child’s placing local authority on how best to achieve this. When there has not been agreement and the manager has continued to have concerns about the online safety of the child, it is not always clear that they have escalated their concerns.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers have high aspirations for children in their care and the staff they are responsible for. As a result, the child and staff speak positively about the leaders and managers and feel supported by them.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers have a range of tools they use to oversee all aspects of the child’s care in the home. As a result, they have a good understanding of the home’s strengths and weaknesses and are developing a learning culture within the home.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers are skilled at building positive working relationships with partner agencies and the child’s family. This promotes partnership working designed to ensure the child gets the correct support. External professionals and family members speak Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 5 positively about the home. They identify communication as a key strength, and did not identify any areas for improvement.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers ensure that staff have regular supervisions, team meetings and good-quality training. They make good use of the home’s therapist to develop staff practice. As a result, staff feel well supported and the child is cared for by staff who are knowledgeable and motivated. Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 6
p.5
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure— that staff—
p.6
Requirement Due date
assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
help each child to understand how to keep safe;
p.6
Requirement Due date
have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm;
p.6
Requirement Due date
manage relationships between children to prevent them from harming each other;
p.6
Requirement Due date
understand the roles and responsibilities in relation to protecting children that are assigned to them by the registered person;
p.6
Requirement Due date
take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
are familiar with, and act in accordance with, the home’s child protection policies. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(vii))
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, ensure that staff demonstrate professional curiosity and take appropriate action when a child raises concerns about other children outside of the home. 30 August 2025
p.6
Requirement Due date
In meeting the quality standards, the registered person must, and must ensure that staff— 30 August 2025 Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 7 seek to involve each child’s placing authority effectively in the child’s care, in accordance with the child’s relevant plans;
p.6
Requirement Due date
seek to secure the input and services required to meet each child’s needs;
p.7
Requirement Due date
if the registered person considers, or staff consider, a placing authority’s or a relevant person’s performance or response to be inadequate in relation to their role, challenge the placing authority or the relevant person to seek to ensure that each child’s needs are met in accordance with the child’s relevant plans; and
p.7
Requirement Due date
seek to develop and maintain effective professional relationships with such persons, bodies or organisations as the registered person considers appropriate having regard to the range of needs of children for whom it is intended that the children’s home is to provide care and accommodation. (Regulation 5 (a)(b)(c)(d))
p.7
Requirement Due date
In particular, this relates to the manager appropriately challenging the placing authority or partner agencies to prevent delay in a child receiving support, or when they feel plans do not appropriately safeguard children.
p.7
Recommendation
The registered person should notify Ofsted and other relevant persons if one of the situations specified in regulation 40(4)(a)-(d) occurs, or if there is an incident relating to the protection, safeguarding or welfare of a child living in the home which the registered person considers to be serious. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 63, paragraph 14.10)
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 8
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider: First Blue Healthcare Limited
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Seighford Hall, Clanford Road, Seighford, Stafford ST18 9NL
p.8
Inspector
John Tomlinson, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2591708 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion