Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Dulverton Junior School
Summary
Kelly Olive (lead), Carl Thornton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Jun 2025
- Inspectors verified
Carl Thornton, Kelly Olive
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
TA22 9EN
- Name on report verified
Dulverton Junior School
- URN verified
123871
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should ensure that there are consistently high expectations of pupils with SEND and p.3
- Parents and carers are extremely positive about the impact of the leadership of the school. p.2
- The school has high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. p.2
- At social times, pupils are well behaved and enjoy the range of activities available to them. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Curriculum10
“ambitious curriculum.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,027
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Dulverton Junior School Fishers Mead, Dulverton TA22 9EN
p.1
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 3 and 4 June 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders are ambitious for pupils at Dulverton Junior School. Pupils receive a warm welcome every day. They are happy and feel safe in school. However, the quality of education that pupils receive does not prepare them effectively enough for their next steps. Pupils have gaps in their knowledge. They struggle to talk with confidence about their learning across the curriculum.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. Pupils respond positively to the calm approach adopted by the school. They understand and follow the school rules of being ‘ready, respectful and safe’. Pupils form positive relationships with staff and their peers. They are role models for the younger pupils in the infant school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy the many opportunities that the school provides. Each year group benefits from attending a residential. Pupils’ recent visit to Bristol, including time at another school, was a rich, culturally diverse experience which pupils remember fondly. The school encourages pupils to embrace being in the outdoors. This supports their physical and mental health. For example, pupils develop endurance and resilience through their participation in ‘Generation Exmoor’. This outdoor learning project allows them to explore Exmoor National Park alongside pupils from other schools in the federation.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has been on a significant journey of improvement. Parents and carers are extremely positive about the impact of the leadership of the school. The move to a different site, alongside the infant school, has created a strong sense of community. During this period of change, staff state that they have felt well supported in managing their workload. They benefit from a comprehensive professional development programme which has strengthened their subject knowledge.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders prioritise reading. There is now a well-resourced library in the heart of the school. Pupils who are selected to be ‘pupil librarians’ take pride in this role. Those pupils who continue to require additional help with learning and blending sounds when they join the junior school, follow an appropriate phonics programme. Other pupils who are secure in their sounds are supported to strengthen their fluency and comprehension. This personalised approach allows pupils to catch up with their peers quickly. Pupils are becoming more confident and fluent readers.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Despite improvements in the quality of early reading at the school, the recent published outcomes from key stage 2 show that older pupils have not built their knowledge and understanding of the curriculum as successfully. Too many pupils have moved onto secondary school without securing strong enough foundations in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
With the support of the federation governors, and the local authority, there has been a radical overhaul of the content across all taught subjects. Pupils now learn a broad and 3 and 4 June 2025
p.2
3
ambitious curriculum. The school draws upon its locality to further enrich pupils’ experiences. However, there remains variation in the quality of teaching pupils receive. Too often, teaching does not define exactly what pupils will learn or break down activities into manageable steps. Checks on pupils’ understanding of the curriculum are not regular or focused enough which means teaching is not always adapted appropriately. Therefore, the impact of recent improvements is not yet being fully realised in what pupils know and can do.
p.3
3
The school has an increasing number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). It is proactive in identifying where pupils may need adjustments or further support. Staff receive helpful information and training which means that most pupils with SEND can learn alongside their peers in the classroom. However, at times, staff expectations of pupils with SEND are not as high as they could be. On occasion, staff are not confident in adapting how they deliver the curriculum to meet the needs of pupils with SEND.
p.3
3
Pupils follow a well-considered personal, social, and health education programme (PSHE). They are curious to learn about faiths and cultures different to their own. Pupils understand how to keep themselves safe online and in the community. At social times, pupils are well behaved and enjoy the range of activities available to them. They show kindness and teamwork in how they play together. Many pupils participate in extra- curricular activities such as cheerleading, gymnastics, archery and cricket.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Too frequently, teaching does not define exactly what pupils will learn or break down activities into manageable steps. Additionally, teachers’ checks on pupils’ understanding of the curriculum are not regular or focused enough so they are unable to adapt their teaching in response to what pupils remember. As a result, gaps in knowledge and misconceptions persist and some pupils do not progress through the curriculum as well as they could. The school should ensure that the work and explanations provided to pupils are consistently appropriate and that teaching is adapted in response to what pupils already know and can do. The school has not ensured that all pupils with SEND have ambitious and measurable targets that support their progress through the curriculum. As a result, the support they receive in the classroom is not always as effective as it could be. The school should ensure that there are consistently high expectations of pupils with SEND and
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
that targets are specific and regularly reviewed. 3 and 4 June 2025
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 3 and 4 June 2025
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Frances Nicholson
p.5
School details
Headteacher Naomi Philp (executive headteacher) Nicola Stenner (head of school) Website www.moorlandfed.co.uk/schools/dulverton- junior-school-somerset Dates of previous inspection 30 November and 1 December 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the Moorland Federation which contains eight schools. The school shares a site with All Saints Church of England Voluntary Controlled Infants School. The head of school took up her post in September 2024. The school uses one registered and one unregistered alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 3 and 4 June 2025
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held discussions with the executive headteacher, head of school (who is also the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator), the chair of the governing body, other members of the governing body, and representatives from the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Additionally, inspectors visited a history lesson and reviewed pupils’ work in religious education. Inspectors spoke to pupils about their experiences of school and their views on
p.6
6
behaviour and bullying. They also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at social times. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors considered parents’ responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. The inspectors also considered responses to Ofsted’s online staff and pupil surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Kelly Olive, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Carl Thornton Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 June 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion