Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection
Ash Hill Academy
Summary
John Linkins (lead), Richard Crane
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
21 May 2025
- Inspectors verified
John Linkins, Richard Crane
- Postcode verified
DN7 6JH
- Name on report verified
Ash Hill Academy
- URN verified
137066
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The support that is put in place is precise and highly effective. p.2
- Leadership at all levels is highly effective. p.2
- Older pupils are resilient and have high expectations for their own success. p.2
- Careers education, advice and guidance at the school is very effective. p.2
- The school has high expectations of how pupils should conduct themselves. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes6
“Many pupils with SEND produce high-quality work and achieve well.” p.2Communication & language5
“Pupils talk with enthusiasm about these opportunities.” p.1Leadership & governance4
“Leadership at all levels is highly effective.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,249
- about usual (typical 1282)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a school judged Good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Ash Hill Academy Ash Hill, Hatfield, Ash Hill Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN7 6JH
p.1
Outcome
Ash Hill Academy has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The principal of this school is Mathew Hicks. The executive principal of the school is Richard Brooke. This school is part of the Delta Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Paul Terence Tarn, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Stephen Peter Hodsman.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
This school is ambitious that all pupils will succeed. Staff are highly motivated and well skilled. Positive relationships between staff and pupils, based on mutual respect, permeate the school. Pupils know that staff want the best for them. Pupils benefit from a variety of enriching opportunities. These include visits to the theatre, universities, local businesses and an outdoor pursuits centre. Leaders continually raise pupils’ aspirations.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations of how pupils should conduct themselves. Pupils move around the school building calmly, respect their environment and wear their uniform with pride. Pastoral care is of a high quality. Staff understand individual pupil’s needs and support them well in the classroom. Over time, academic achievement at the school has improved significantly. Disadvantaged pupils now achieve well in many subjects.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The importance of good behaviour and attendance are regularly celebrated. Many pupils work hard to achieve these rewards. The school provides deliberate opportunities for pupils to develop their character and spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding. This includes the ‘pledge’ system that encourages pupils’ wider participation in the life of the school and local community. Pupils talk with enthusiasm about these opportunities. Parents recognise the positive changes that have taken place at the school over time. 20 and 21 May 2025
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has developed a curriculum that is highly ambitious for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff know which topics pupils might struggle to understand. They plan opportunities to revisit important knowledge and skills regularly so that pupils master them. The way that pupils learn new vocabulary is also well considered. Pupils use technical vocabulary with increasing confidence.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Staff choose the activities pupils will undertake in each lesson carefully. Explanations of how to achieve each stage of learning are clearly given. Staff are knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects. This positively impacts pupils’ classroom experience. Older pupils are resilient and have high expectations for their own success. Pupils say that staff will always help them when they need it.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The questions that staff ask pupils to identify what they do, and do not, understand are effective. Staff address any misconceptions that pupils hold about previous learning. The school checks what pupils know and can do effectively. Staff workload is considered thoughtfully when planning changes at the school. Staff talk positively about how the school supports their well-being in various ways. They are proud to work at the school.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils with SEND are valued members of the school community. Staff and pupils understand and support pupils who might need extra help. Pupils’ specific needs are accurately identified and addressed. In lessons, suitable adjustments are made to resources and tasks to help pupils with SEND learn the curriculum effectively. Many pupils with SEND produce high-quality work and achieve well.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school quickly identifies those who might need extra help learning to read fluently. The support that is put in place is precise and highly effective. This helps pupils who begin the school significantly behind their peers to quickly catch up. Pupils are regularly encouraged to read for pleasure. Reading is a high priority at the school.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The vast majority of pupils conduct themselves well in lessons and at social times. However, the school’s strategic approach to improving behaviour and rates of attendance is not as effective as it might be for a minority of pupils. Rates of persistent absence and suspension among some groups of pupils remain too high. The school recognises this is the case and has taken determined action to address it.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Careers education, advice and guidance at the school is very effective. Older pupils are ambitious about future study and employment opportunities. Talks from visiting professionals and higher education providers inspire pupils for their futures. Pupils leave school with the qualifications they need to access higher education.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leadership at all levels is highly effective. Governors support and challenge the school to continually improve. Professional development for staff is carefully tailored to their needs and career goals. Regular opportunities for staff to take on additional responsibilities empower them to be the best they can be. 20 and 21 May 2025
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
A small, but significant, number of pupils are suspended from school too regularly or are persistently absent. This is particularly the case for some vulnerable pupil groups. This impacts negatively on their educational experience and academic outcomes. The school should further refine its approach to reducing incidents of suspension and rates of persistent absence, especially for those pupils in receipt of the pupil premium or with SEND.
p.3
Background
Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.
p.3
Background
We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in March 2020.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 20 and 21 May 2025
p.3
4
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 20 and 21 May 2025
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 4 and 5 March 2020, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Since the previous inspection, the principal and several other senior leaders have taken up their roles. The school uses three providers of alternative education. Two are registered with the Department for Education. One is not registered with the Department for Education. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have 20 and 21 May 2025
p.5
6
taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the principal, other senior leaders and the special educational needs coordinator. The lead inspector also spoke with members of the trust and local governing body, and a representative of the chief executive officer. Inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with some pupils and teachers and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors met with the leaders responsible for reading and literacy across the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in a range of situations, including in corridors, at
p.6
6
breaktimes, at lunchtimes and in lessons. They also spoke to pupils about what it is like to attend the school. Inspectors considered the responses from parents and carers to the online parent survey, Ofsted Parent View. This included the comments submitted via the free-text facility. Inspectors also considered responses to Ofsted’s online pupil and staff surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
John Linkins, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Richard Crane Ofsted Inspector 20 and 21 May 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion