Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

a school not in a category of concern of Whitehill Primary School

Inspected — · published 23 Jun 2025

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Toby Martlew

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Toby Martlew

  • Postcode verified

    DA12 5HN

  • Name on report verified

    a school not in a category of concern of Whitehill Primary School

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisepositiveconsistentlywell supportedeffectivelyenjoyrigorousfeel safedisruption
Criticismnot consistentlygapsnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings567w+48
  • What needs to improve40w+47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
606
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 93%What needs to improve 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Angela Carpenter Headteacher Whitehill Primary School Sun Lane Gravesend Kent DA12 5HN

p.1

Primary School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 30 April 2025, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school meets the monitoring threshold as set out in the Monitoring Inspection Handbook .

p.1

Primary School

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s key and (where applicable) provision judgements, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

Primary School

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the trust, trustees and governors the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, met with other staff and conducted work and other document scrutiny. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but some aspects of the

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but some aspects of the

 Implement the curriculum consistently well by equipping staff with the knowledge and skills to emphasise the key content accurately, carefully check what pupils know and use this information to adapt future teaching.

p.1

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, the school has had a notable change in leadership. The school has recently joined a different academy trust. This has made a change to the support and governance of the school.

p.2

Main findings

The school has made extensive changes to the curriculum since the previous inspection. It has prioritised professional development and consistent teaching. The school is focusing on ensuring the planned and taught content closely match. Some of this work has not had the intended impact and teaching is not consistently effective. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported by staff, both in and out of lessons. Staff are well trained and utilise the right resources to help pupils with SEND access the curriculum. Pupils are remembering more of the current content and can apply this knowledge effectively. They are fluent and accurate readers and enjoy reading in and out of school. The school still has work to do in making sure that gaps in pupils’ prior knowledge are addressed. It does not carefully check what pupils know across the curriculum and use this to inform and adapt future teaching. Consequently, pupils are not

p.2

Main findings

The school’s leaders have made a significant positive difference to the school. Alongside the leadership of the recently joined trust, they have set up rigorous structures for school improvement that are showing some dividends. Staff are positive about the changes and feel well cared for and supported. The trust has detailed plans for improvement. However, some of these have not been fully enacted. As a result of the recency of these changes, the monitoring and overview of the curriculum has not been fully impactful.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils are content and feel safe. Their conduct in lessons is positive and there is no disruption to learning. Pupils play together conscientiously and with care at breaktimes. They have positive attitudes to learning and are excited by their opportunities at school.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the CEO of the Aletheia Academies Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion