Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)

Childminder in Durham

Inspected 15 May 2025 · published 20 Jun 2025 · URN 2655755

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Dani Taylor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 May 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Dani Taylor

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    2655755

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−71Very criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongrobust
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysnot robustweaknot yetpoorbreachnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings823w−74
  • Safeguarding180w−31

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
965
about usual (typical 899)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 1
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Safeguarding 12%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Standards in this setting have not been maintained following previous enforcement action. Safeguarding arrangements are not robust. For instance, the premises are not suitably clean and hygienic for the provision of childcare and risk assessments are not well embedded. This has an impact on children's health and safety.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The childminder takes children on regular outings to support children's knowledge of the heritage of their local area. Children benefit from visiting a range of local attractions, such as museums and public gardens. However, the overall quality of education is still not at a good standard. Weaknesses in planning for children's next steps, mean that activities are not always pitched at the right level to best support babies and toddlers. As a result, the progress babies make in these activities is limited. Furthermore, staff do not thoughtfully plan how best to settle children into the setting. For instance, there is an over reliance on screen time to calm unsettled toddlers and distract them from crying. As a result, these children do not have enough opportunity to develop strong bonds with staff and are not supported well enough in their communication and language skills.

p.2

need to do better?

n Safeguarding policies are not fully understood by all members of staff. The childminder does not ensure that they have a full understanding of the procedures to follow in the event of an allegation. This means that the correct procedures in reporting concerns about others practice may not be followed. This does not ensure children's safety. n The childminder has not maintained standards which were addressed following previous inspection and enforcement activity. This includes requirements relating to hygiene, risk assessment and safeguarding policies. This means that the evaluation of her setting is weak and does not indicate that the childminder is able to make and sustain improvements. n The childminder has also not addressed weaknesses in the quality of education, nor provided enough support for children's individual needs. This is particularly evident for children who require additional support. The childminder is

p.2

need to do better?

undertaking additional training and development programs, however improvements are not being made rapidly enough. There is an impact on the quality of children's experiences and their development as a result. n The childminder does not ensure that she offers supervision sessions to support and develop staffs skills to raise the quality of interactions to a good standard. Although further external training has been provided, this is not yet having enough impact on children. For instance, the childminder has not ensured that staff have received enough support to understand the intended curriculum. As a result, they are unsure of how to best support children's individual needs.

p.2

need to do better?

15 May 2025 n Hygiene practices in the setting are poor. For instance, a cat litter tray containing a significant amount of cat faeces is stored in the kitchen, along with multiple bowls of cat food. The smell of the cat faeces is noticeable in the areas where children are cared for. Furthermore, the areas of the home where children play are not clean enough. This includes the sofas and playmats. This does not provide a suitably clean and hygienic environment for children to play and learn. n There is not a robust culture of risk assessment in this setting. For instance, items such as batteries are not stored safely. Children are not always closely supervised when they play near the cats, including during times when cats display agitated behaviours. Kittens are not prevented from interacting with babies and toddlers while they eat. This does not minimise the risk of cats injuring or transmitting infections to children.

p.2

need to do better?

n There is not enough support for young children to develop their early communication skills. For instance, toddlers watch nursery rhyme cartoons on the television. Although the childminder joins in and sings, the effectiveness of her interactions is minimised due to the barrier created by the television. As such, toddlers are not able to develop key skills such as making eye contact or back and forth interaction with the childminder. n Although the childminder broadly assesses children's areas for development, the support provided is not broken down into small enough steps. As a result, activities are not effectively delivered. For instance, to support fine motor development, mark making tools are provided for babies who do not yet have the understanding or skills to use them. As a result, they quickly loose interest in the activity. The lack of a clear sequence in planning for children's learning limits

p.3

need to do better?

the progress children make, as well as having an impact on their developing attitudes to learning. n During the course of the inspection it was found that the childminder has not informed Ofsted of changes which must be notified to Ofsted. This is a further breach to requirements and highlights weaknesses in the leadership and management of the setting.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.3

Due date

15 May 2025 ensure that all members of staff have a comprehensive understanding of safeguarding policies and procedures, including a full understanding of the process to follow in the event of an allegation being made against a member of staff 30/05/2025

p.3

Due date

improve procedures to evaluate and improve your setting, ensuring that the provision meets children's needs and promotes their good development, safety and happiness 30/05/2025

p.4

Due date

provide assistants with training, supervision and support that raises the quality of care and education 30/05/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure that all areas of the provision are suitably clean for the provision of childcare and comply with food hygiene requirements 30/05/2025

p.4

Due date

implement robust risk assessments, to ensure all potential hazards are identified and that exposure to risks is minimised 30/05/2025

p.4

Due date

embed frequent opportunities for babies and toddlers to practice and develop their early communication and language skills 30/06/2025

p.4

Due date

improve the sequence of the curriculum, to ensure that planning is sharply focussed on supporting children's development. 30/06/2025

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 2655755 Local authority Durham Inspection number 10405642 Type of provision Childminder

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 12 Number of children on roll 18 Date of previous inspection 12 August 2024

p.5

Information about this early years setting

The childminder registered in 2021 and lives in the Belmont area of Durham. She operates all year round from 7am to 6pm, Monday to Saturday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder closes for two weeks at Christmas. The childminder holds an appropriate early years qualification at level 6. She works with an assistant.

p.5

Inspection activities

n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their early years foundation stage curriculum. n The childminder showed the inspector around the premises. n Children communicated with the inspector during the inspection. n Assistants spoke to the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector observed the interactions between assistants, the childminder and the children. n The childminder and the inspector carried out a joint observation during snack time. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

15 May 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion