Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Quarrydale Academy

Inspected 8 May 2025 · published 19 Jun 2025 · URN 137857

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 May 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Damian Painton, Gulbanu Kader, Janis Warren, Jules Gordon, Matthew Fearns-Davies, Stuart Anderson

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NG17 2DU

  • Name on report verified

    Quarrydale Academy

  • URN verified

    137857

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 20% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiousconsistentlycaringpositivewell preparedsuccessfullyeffectiveimproved
Criticismnot consistentlygapsweaknessesnot well preparednot sufficientlynot high-qualityvariablelimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1340w+25
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,305
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
24%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of Quarrydale Academy Stoneyford Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire NG17 2DU

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Tim Paling. This school is a single academy trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Jill Wildsmith. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school provides a caring environment for pupils. Staff are hardworking and committed to providing pupils with the support they need. Pupils feel safe. The school’s pastoral offer is strong. Parents and carers appreciate the ‘lovely teachers’ and the ‘supportive’ approach that the school takes. However, parents rightly recognise that some pupils do not behave or achieve as well as they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school does have high aspirations for pupils. However, the quality of education provided varies in quality. The school does not consistently ensure that pupils engage purposefully in their learning or take pride in their work.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Some pupils hear derogatory language in school on a regular basis. The school does encourage pupils to respect difference. The work to realise this goal does not have the desired impact for some pupils. The school provides pupils with some opportunities to broaden their horizons, including trips to Paris and the chance for sixth-form students to mentor their younger peers.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Although sixth-form students do not receive consistently high-quality support in relation to their personal development and academic work, they do appreciate the respectful environment in which they learn. They form positive relationships with staff. Some students leave school well prepared for their next steps.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In most subjects, the school has developed a coherent and ambitious curriculum. Generally, learning is sequenced well, and this helps teachers to support pupils to build their knowledge successfully and produce high-quality work. However, there are some subjects in which the curriculum is not as carefully sequenced or ambitious. Where this is the case, teachers are less clear about the key knowledge that they want pupils to learn and their expectations of what pupils can achieve are not consistently high. As a result, some pupils do not recall their learning or develop a secure understanding of important concepts and subject-specific vocabulary.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Staff do not consistently provide activities that enable pupils to learn the ambitious aims of the curriculum. Similarly, the school has not ensured that teachers identify and address gaps and misconceptions in pupils’ knowledge. Sometimes, the learning is moved on before pupils have gained the knowledge they need. This limits how well pupils are able to learn.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Staff are caring and inclusive. The school identifies the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) promptly. Teachers use the helpful information the school provides, to adapt their teaching successfully for pupils with SEND. However, the weaknesses in the teaching of the curriculum mean that pupils with SEND have the same variable achievement as their peers. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.2

3

The school recognises when pupils need extra help with their reading. Pupils receive personalised support and develop the fluency of their reading.

p.3

3

There have been some improvements in behaviour since the previous inspection. Most pupils know the importance of behaving well. They move around the school calmly and take pride in their work. However, some pupils do not behave sensibly around the school site and do not arrive on time at their lessons. The school has not ensured that staff implement the school’s behaviour policy consistently. More recently, staff have received training to help them in their management of behaviour. This has provided greater clarity as to how pupils should behave and the actions that staff should take when pupils do not live up to these expectations.

p.3

3

The school has prioritised pupils’ attendance. Staff have analysed the barriers to attendance. They have taken effective action to remove those barriers. Pupils attend well. The attendance of students in the sixth form has improved, but some students still do not attend regularly enough.

p.3

3

Pupils are not as well prepared for life in modern Britain as they should be. They have not developed secure knowledge of fundamental British values or major world faiths and religions. Some pupils take advantage of the clubs that the school provides but many do not. The school provides pupils with some helpful advice and guidance about next steps and careers. However, the sharing of this guidance has not been organised carefully enough to ensure that pupils, and students in the sixth form, enjoy a consistently high- quality offer.

p.3

3

The school has begun to evaluate the impact of its strategies to bring about improvement in some areas of the provision. Where this is the case, pupils’ experiences of school have improved. In those areas where the school’s evaluation is less precise, the school has begun to consider what needs to improve. However, this work is in the early stages. Generally, staff feel well supported and valued by the school. However, some staff feel that they need more support, including to manage their workload.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s expectations of what pupils should achieve in their lessons are not consistently high. As a result, pupils do not routinely benefit from work which enables them to learn the ambitious aims of the curriculum. The school should ensure that teachers have consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve and provide work which enables pupils to be able to learn the ambitious curriculum well. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.3

4

 The school has not ensured that teachers consistently identify and address gaps and misconceptions in pupils’ knowledge. As a result, teachers move learning on before pupils have the knowledge they need. This can limit how well pupils develop a secure understanding over time. The school should ensure that teachers check pupils’ understanding to inform the decisions they make about when to move learning on and when to provide pupils with further support.  The school has not ensured that staff consistently apply the school’s behaviour policy. As a result, some pupils do not display positive and respectful attitudes to the school and to their education. The school should ensure that staff apply the school’s behaviour policy consistently and confidently.  The personal development offer does not provide pupils with the knowledge they need in relation to fundamental British values, spiritual and cultural education and protected

p.4

4

characteristics. As a result, pupils are not as well prepared for life in modern Britain as they should be. The school should ensure that pupils are provided with meaningful opportunities to learn about difference and what it means to respect difference, so that they are well prepared for life in modern Britain.  The school’s evaluation of the impact of its strategies to bring about improvement is not sufficiently precise across all areas of the provision. This has resulted in the impact of these strategies being limited in some areas. The school should ensure that the evaluation of its work to bring about improvement has the desired positive impact across the whole provision so that pupils achieve well.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 7 and 8 May 2025

p.4

School details

Local authority Nottinghamshire County Council

p.5

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1275

p.5

form

Dates of previous inspection 15 and 16 November 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school currently uses six unregistered alternative provisions.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school's education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior leaders, subject leaders, staff and trustees.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics, science, geography, physical education and social sciences. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with leaders responsible for pupils’ behaviour, attendance and personal development. They also met with leaders responsible for the provision for pupils with SEND, the provision for disadvantaged pupils and alternative provision.  Inspectors met with the leader responsible for provision in the sixth form, visited sixth-

p.6

6

form lessons and met with groups of sixth-form students.  Inspectors met formally and informally with groups of pupils.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered responses received on Ofsted’s Parent View, including free-text responses. They also considered responses to the Ofsted surveys for school staff and pupils.

p.6

Inspection team

Matthew Fearns-Davies, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Jules Gordon Ofsted Inspector 7 and 8 May 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion