Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Leyland Methodist Infant School

Inspected 8 May 2025 · published 19 Jun 2025 · URN 150578

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pat Speed (lead), Suzanne Blay

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 May 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Pat Speed, Suzanne Blay

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PR25 3ET

  • Name on report verified

    Leyland Methodist Infant School

  • URN verified

    150578

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyextremelyoutstandingproudstronghappysupportiverespectful
Criticismgapsdisruptionnot secureconcerningstruggletoo manynot effectivenot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1182w+44
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,162
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of Leyland Methodist Infant School Canberra Road, Leyland, Lancashire PR25 3ET

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

The executive headteacher is Karen Chadwick, who is responsible for this school and one other. The head of school is Nicola Rogerson. The school is part of the Epworth Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Julie-Ann Hewitt, and is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Stuart Ellis.

p.1

Ofsted has not previously inspected Leyland Methodist Infant School under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. However, Ofsted previously judged the school to be outstanding for overall effectiveness, before it opened as an academy. Since September 2024, schools have not been awarded an overall effectiveness grade. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils and staff are proud to be part of this inclusive and happy school. Leaders and staff have created strong, supportive relationships with pupils and their families. Pupils feel they are well cared for and are keen to do their best.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

From the moment children enter the Reception classes, they are encouraged to follow the school’s rules. Pupils understand what is expected of them. They know they need to be ‘ready, respectful and safe’. They follow the rules to the best of their ability. For those who may struggle with this, individualised support is offered. As a result, pupils behave well and school is a calm space with little disruption to learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school expects pupils to do well so that they are ready for junior school when that time comes. Pupils are enthusiastic and enjoy learning new things. They work hard and try their best in lessons. Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), typically achieve well in a range of subjects.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy a broad variety of experiences. Older pupils act as role models for younger pupils. Sports leaders support Reception children with their play during lunchtimes. A range of leadership opportunities ensure that pupils are able to contribute to the life of the school. For example, the school council were involved in the design for the new school logo. The ethos group are actively involved in raising funds for charities both near to home, for example, the local food bank and further afield, supporting a school in Uganda.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has developed a well-ordered curriculum. Refinements that the school has introduced are having a positive impact. This is particularly so in reading. This allows children from the early years and pupils throughout key stage 1 to build their knowledge securely over time. Teachers explain new learning clearly. They regularly check to make sure that pupils have learned what was intended. As a result, for most subjects, pupils build a secure bank of knowledge over time. Most pupils progress well through the curriculum.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

However, in a small number of subjects, the curriculum has only recently been refined. Pupils in Years 1 and 2 have not benefited fully from the school’s redesigned curriculum in these subjects. Gaps exist in pupils’ prior knowledge which sometimes go unaddressed, hindering how well some pupils build their knowledge and skills securely over time.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Reading is at the heart of the school’s curriculum. Early on, pupils develop a love of books. In the Reception class children enjoy stories. Older pupils speak enthusiastically about the books they have read. Learning to read is a priority and the school’s chosen phonics programme is delivered with consistency and expertise. The introduction of the fluency element of the phonics programme, ensures pupils read accurately and with confidence by the end of Year 2. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.2

3

From the moment children start in the Reception classes, and throughout Years 1 and 2, there is an emphasis on developing vocabulary. This supports their writing. However, from the early years and into key stage 1, too many children and pupils do not secure effective pencil grip and accurate letter formation. This slows the pace at which pupils become fluent writers.

p.3

3

The school supports pupils with SEND extremely well. It accurately identifies any barriers to learning that these pupils may have. Where pupils need something more individual, this is provided without delay. Carefully considered lesson adaptations means that pupils, where appropriate, access the same curriculum alongside their peers. As a result, pupils with SEND progress well.

p.3

3

The school has designed a well-constructed programme to support pupils’ wider development. Pupils understand how to keep themselves healthy, both physically and mentally. They also know how to keep themselves safe online. Pupils learn about the differences between people and families in age-appropriate ways. The transition programme the school has in place means that pupils are well supported, both socially and academically, for their next step into junior school.

p.3

3

Trust leaders and governors have a clear, shared vision. They understand their roles and responsibilities extremely well. Together, they hold the school to account for the quality of education that pupils receive and the outcomes that they achieve.

p.3

3

Staff are proud to work at this school. They feel valued and are appreciative of the considerations the school and the trust take concerning their workload and well-being. Change is managed in a way that does not overwhelm staff and supports them to carry out their roles effectively.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 For a small number of subjects, the implementation of the refined curriculum is relatively new. This means that for some year groups there may be gaps in their previous knowledge as some content in the previous curriculum was not as clearly defined. The school should ensure that any gaps in pupils’ knowledge as the result of previous curriculums are addressed so that pupils can deepen their understanding of these subjects over time.  The school does not prioritise with sufficient rigour the teaching of early transcription and letter formation. This hinders the development of pupils’ early writing skills. The trust should ensure that the school gives greater focus to letter formation and pencil grip so that pupils gain the necessary knowledge to become proficient writers. 7 and 8 May 2025

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 7 and 8 May 2025

p.4

School details

Website www.leylandmethodistschools.org.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Epworth Education Trust. It became an academy on 1 May 2024.  The school is federated with Leyland Methodist Junior School which is also a part of the Epworth Education Trust.  This is a Methodist infant school. Its next section 48 inspection, for schools of a religious character, is due this academic year.  The executive headteacher was appointed in September 2024.  The school does not make use of alternative provision for its pupils.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and 7 and 8 May 2025

p.5

6

management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection that the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken this into account in their evaluation.  Inspectors held meetings with the executive headteacher and other members of staff. The lead inspector spoke with members of the board of trustees including the chair online. She also spoke to members of the local advisory board, including the chair and a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors conducted deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, considered samples of pupils’ work and spoke to some pupils about their learning. The lead inspector listened to

p.6

6

pupils from years 1 and 2 read to a familiar adult.  Inspectors also scrutinised curriculum documents and samples of pupils’ work in other subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour at various times in the school day. This included during lessons as well as at playtime and lunchtime.  Inspectors met with pupils to ask about their experiences of school.  Inspectors considered the views expressed by parents and carers in their responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. Inspectors spoke with parents as they brought their children to school at the start of the school day.  Inspectors also took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaires for

p.6

Inspection team

Pat Speed, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Suzanne Blay Ofsted Inspector 7 and 8 May 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion