Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Acornwood Pre-School

Inspected 26 Mar 2025 · published 19 Jun 2025 · URN 109949

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Mandy Cooper

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Acornwood Pre-School Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP517938

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Mar 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Mandy Cooper

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    GU14 0NA

  • Name on report verified

    Acornwood Pre-School

  • URN verified

    109949

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−57Criticalmore positive than 19% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivelykindmake good progresshappyenjoycaringeffective
Criticismnot alwayspoorbreachesnot effectiveinadequateat riskineffectiveshortcomings

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings752w−55
  • Safeguarding100w−48

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
824
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
0
typical 1
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Inspection of Acornwood Pre-School 8 Links Way, FARNBOROUGH, Hampshire GU14 0NA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Leaders do not have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities. The pre-school has faced a period of instability and the provider has struggled to recruit a consistent staff team. This has placed additional pressure on some leaders. Poor oversight and a lack of monitoring have led to a decline in standards. There are breaches of the legal requirements, which have a negative impact on outcomes for children. For example, staff are not always deployed effectively to ensure that children are adequately supervised, particularly when children visit the toilets or the large hall. This compromises children's safety and well-being.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The procedures for supporting children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), and those who are at risk of falling behind, are not effective. Therefore, these children's individual learning needs are not fully supported. Children do not all develop the knowledge, skills and attitude to learning needed to be ready for school.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Staff are kind and children appear happy in the pre-school. Most children enjoy exploring the activities available and generally behave well. Staff remind them of the 'golden rules' around being kind to others. They build positive relationships with children. For instance, staff recognise when children are upset, and they offer cuddles for reassurance. They speak to children in a kind and caring manner. Children settle well into the environment.

p.2

need to do better?

n Instability in the leadership team has resulted in some leaders feeling overwhelmed with their workload. They have taken on additional responsibilities and they do not have enough time to complete the requirements of their roles. As a result, monitoring and evaluation of the setting have been poor. Leaders do not have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities to ensure compliance with statutory requirements. Self-evaluation is ineffective, and insufficient progress has been made to drive improvement. However, leaders know the challenges ahead and demonstrate a positive attitude toward addressing these shortcomings. n Leaders do not deploy staff within the setting effectively. As a result, the staffing arrangements do not meet children's needs. Children are not always adequately supervised and are exposed to hazards that go unnoticed. Leaders do not always ensure that the deployment of staff is effective during busy times of the day,

p.2

need to do better?

such as when parents bring their children to the pre-school. In addition, staff and leaders do not always ensure that children are within sight or hearing. For instance, children wander into areas of the building that are not visible to staff. This repeatedly goes unnoticed, which results in children not being supervised

p.2

need to do better?

26 March 2025 appropriately. n Staff provide children with a healthy breakfast and snacks. They support parents by sharing information on healthy lunch box ideas. This helps to promote healthy food choices for children. However, current food safety procedures are inadequate. Staff do not ensure that children are properly supervised during mealtimes, leaving them to eat alone with minimal oversight. Additionally, staff do not prepare foods, such as grapes, apples and carrots, appropriately to minimise the risk of choking. n The arrangements in place to support children with SEND are not sufficient to ensure that children's needs are met. Although staff identify children with SEND early on, they do not ensure that they get the support that they need. For example, staff rely too much on parents and carers to get children professional support. Referrals to external agencies are not done in a timely manner. This

p.2

need to do better?

means that children with SEND are at a disadvantage and gaps in their learning do not close. Children who require additional support often play alone. Staff working directly with children with SEND have limited knowledge and do not implement strategies consistently. This impacts children's emotional well-being and widens the gap in their development. n Overall, leaders have created an appropriate curriculum that supports most children's communication and language. For example, children happily chat back and forth with staff, telling them about their recent holiday to Tunisia. This helps children to build a wide vocabulary. However, there have been recent staff absences that have led to there being a disjointed approach to delivering the curriculum. Leaders have not ensured that there is a common understanding of the curriculum intent, particularly for those children with SEND. Weaknesses in the curriculum and teaching mean that some children have limited opportunities

p.3

need to do better?

to make good progress in their learning.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.3

Due date

26 March 2025 ensure that leaders have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities, and monitor the provision effectively to identify any breaches of requirements 25/04/2025

p.3

Due date

improve the deployment of staff to make sure that children are appropriately supervised at all times to ensure their safety 25/04/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure that food is prepared and served appropriately to promote children's safety at mealtimes 25/04/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure that timely interventions and referrals are made to better support children with SEND. 25/04/2025

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 109949 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 10388452 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Sessional day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 31 Name of registered person Acornwood Pre-School Committee

p.5

Telephone number

Date of previous inspection 11 July 2019

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Acornwood Pre-School registered in 1987. It operates from Southwood Community Centre in Farnborough, Hampshire. The pre-school is open from 9am to 2.45pm, Monday to Thursday, during term time. There are six members of staff, three of whom hold relevant early years qualifications at level 3 or above, and one is qualified at level 2. The pre-school is in receipt of funding for the provision of early education to children aged two, three and four years.

p.5

Inspection activities

n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want the children to learn. n Children told the inspector about their friends and what they like to do when they are at pre-school. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector spoke with the nominated individual about the leadership and management of the setting. n Staff spoke to the inspector about how they support children with SEND. n The manager and the inspector carried out a joint observation during a physical skills activity. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

26 March 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion