Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)

Childminder in Waltham Forest

Inspected 3 Apr 2025 · published 13 Jun 2025 · URN EY442806

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Julia Crowley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Apr 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Julia Crowley

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Met

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    EY442806

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 52% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveambitioussafemake good progresshigh-qualityfeel safesecurehappy
Criticismconcernsbreachespoorweaklacknot effectiveineffectivedoes not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings960w−53
  • Safeguarding197w+36

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,121
about usual (typical 899)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 51
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 1
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 12%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Met

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Significant breaches of the requirements of the statutory framework for the early years foundation stage (EYFS) impact on children's safety and welfare. The childminder's expectations for the quality of the provision are poor. As a result, the childminder does not have effective systems in place to monitor and improve her teaching, practice and the environment in which children play and learn. Children's individual needs are not being met, and all children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and those who are disadvantaged, are not making the progress they are capable of.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The childminder has not taken appropriate steps to keep children safe. Young children play in a restricted indoor space, which does not support them to grow in confidence and mobility. Window blinds are shut at the back and front of the childminder's home, restricting natural light. This does not create an enabling environment to support children's welfare or learning. The outdoor play area has several hazards. This demonstrates a lack of prioritising children's safety. The arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective, as the childminder has a weak knowledge in some areas, for example how to report concerns regarding children's safety to relevant agencies.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The childminder's expectations for children's learning are not age-appropriate. She does not know how to sequence children's learning appropriately so that they develop basic knowledge and skills in readiness to learn. Very young children who struggle to settle and become distressed do not receive sufficient time and reassurance from the childminder or any assistants she works with. This does not support children's personal and emotional development or support them to feel safe, secure and happy. This impacts on children's motivation to learn.

p.2

need to do better?

n The childminder has a poor oversight of the quality of her provision and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the EYFS requirements. This limits the childminder's capacity to make and sustain improvements that assure the safety and welfare of children. Consequently, despite receiving previous actions through a welfare requirement notice, there remain breaches of these requirements. n The childminder has not devised and implemented a curriculum that is ambitious and meets the needs of all children. The childminder moves from one play resource to another with little purpose and expects children to do the same. For example, children move from cars to a disorganised circle time and then to musical toys within a few minutes, with little engagement or interest from the children. As a result, children do not concentrate long enough to make good progress in their learning.

p.2

need to do better?

3 April 2025 n The childminder does not sufficiently take account of children's individual interests or stages of development. Young children who need more time to feel secure and settled are expected to begin to count and recognise words and letters by using small phonics flash cards, which are far above their current stage of development. Children also show limited interest in this. This does not support children to make the progress they are capable of or provide opportunities that help them to engage in meaningful play. This has an impact on children's motivation to learn. n The childminder does not use everyday activities as an opportunity for young children to hear words and the rhythm of sentences. Mealtimes and nappy changing are viewed as practical tasks and not as an opportunity for quality interaction with very young children. The childminder does not successfully create an environment that supports children's emerging communication skills.

p.2

need to do better?

Children do not have enough opportunities to hear, learn and use words to communicate and take part. The childminder and any assistants mainly only talk briefly with children, often to give instructions. n The childminder has some knowledge and understanding of how to support children with SEND. However, she does not have secure intentions for what needs to happen in the meantime for children waiting for assessments to be completed. This means children do not receive the meaningful and necessary support that is needed so that they continue to develop and learn. n The childminder has a weak understanding of effective risk assessment. She has failed to identify and remove several risks to children in the outdoor area, for example a bathtub propped against a fence, discarded computer equipment and sharp brackets. As a result, risks are not minimised to help keep children safe. n Children have limited space to play in. The childminding areas are crowded with

p.3

need to do better?

equipment, furniture and storage. This restricts the amount of space children have to move around and explore their environment. n The childminder does not ensure she has an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues. For example, she does not know the correct procedures to follow in the event of an allegation being made against a person working with children. This means that concerns may not be reported correctly to the local statutory children's services. n The childminder provides healthy cooked meals. However, food is often used as a way of managing children's behaviour as well as providing something to do. For example, children are given food to pacify them when they are distressed. Lunch is served more than an hour earlier because there are no spontaneous or planned activities to offer children. Furthermore, children are fed snacks and drinks before they are served their meal. As a result, children do not finish their

p.3

need to do better?

lunch. The mealtime is abandoned, and young children are placed back on the floor. This does not promote healthy eating habits or aid the safe digestion of food. n Parents feel they can discuss their children with the childminder. She provides an online system for parents, with photos to inform them of what their children are doing.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.4

Due date

ensure that there is constant and effective oversight of the setting to consistently meet EYFS requirements 29/04/2025

p.4

Due date

implement effective support for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) so that their needs are always met 29/04/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure that risk assessment is used effectively to identify and remove or minimise risks to children's health and safety 29/04/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure that premises and equipment are organised in a way that meets the needs of all children 29/04/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure a thorough and effective understanding of safeguarding policies and procedures, so that concerns regarding children's safety are promptly identified and responded to through reporting to the correct and relevant agencies 29/04/2025

p.4

Due date

ensure that children's behaviour is supported, understood, and managed in an appropriate way. 29/04/2025

p.4

Due date

devise and implement an ambitious curriculum that sequences and supports children's learning 29/04/2025

p.5

Due date

ensure that planning for activities takes account of children's individual interests and stages of learning so that activities are interesting, enjoyable, and challenging for every child 29/04/2025

p.5

Due date

provide children with high-quality interactions which support their developing communication and language skills. 29/04/2025

p.5

Setting details

Unique reference number EY442806 Local authority London Borough of Waltham Forest Inspection number 10395553 Type of provision Childminder

p.6

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder

p.6

inspection

Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 15 Date of previous inspection 15 January 2024

p.6

Information about this early years setting

The childminder registered in 2012. She lives in Chingford, in the London Borough of Waltham Forest. The childminder works each weekday, from 7.30am to 6.30pm, throughout most of the year. The childminder is registered to work with an assistant. The childminder is in receipt of funding to provide early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.6

Inspection activities

n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their EYFS curriculum. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder and children. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector.

p.6

Inspection activities

3 April 2025 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

3 April 2025 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.8

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion