Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Micklefield Church of England Primary Academy
Summary
Georgina Chinaka (lead), Paul Higginbottom
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
30 Apr 2025
- Inspectors verified
Georgina Chinaka, Paul Higginbottom
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LS25 4AQ
- Name on report verified
Micklefield Church of England Primary Academy
- URN verified
149025
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school has transformed the curriculum over recent years to ensure that it is ambitious and well sequenced. p.2
- The school has high expectations for all pupils. p.2
- Staff have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour, and most pupils meet these. p.2
- The school has introduced effective ways to develop pupils’ love of reading. p.3
- Consequently, the school is moving from strength to strength in all areas of its work. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, there is not always clarity about the precise support that some pupils with SEND need to succeed in their learning. p.2
- This means that pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to revisit or apply the important knowledge and skills they need to. p.3
- The trust should continue to refine and strengthen its work to raise attendance and ensure that pupils’ attendance is high. p.4
- It has identified precisely what pupils should learn and when. p.2
- The trust should ensure all staff have a secure understanding of the curriculum expectations for each year group and pupils have sufficient time to deepen their knowledge and skills. p.3
- The trust should ensure that there is clarity around the precise support pupils with SEND need and 29 and 30 April 2025 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“Those responsible for governance know the school well.” p.3Teaching & assessment2
“The headteacher of this school is Emma Cook.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,149
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Micklefield Church of England Primary Academy Great North Road, Micklefield, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS25 4AQ
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Emma Cook. This school is part of Collaborative Learning Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Janet Sheriff OBE, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Ian Bond. 29 and 30 April 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Micklefield Church of England Primary Academy is a nurturing and welcoming place. Staff know each pupil well. Pupils feel valued. This is reflected in the many ways they contribute to the life of the school. Pupils take pride in their responsibilities, such as being reading mentors, members of the ethos committee, and as lunchtime helpers. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are fully included in all opportunities.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations for all pupils. It has strengthened the curriculum in recent years. This is having a positive impact on pupils’ current learning. The school gives pupils regular opportunities to share and debate their ideas with each other.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour, and most pupils meet these. Bullying is rare and, when it does happen, the school address it swiftly. The school develops pupils’ character and independence in many positive ways. Pupils learn to treat each other with kindness and respect. They talk confidently about how to recognise and manage their feelings and emotions.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are safe in school. The curriculum helps them identify risks and harmful behaviours. They know how to stay safe online. There is a breadth of extra-curricular activities to extend pupils’ experiences.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has transformed the curriculum over recent years to ensure that it is ambitious and well sequenced. The school has considered the curriculum for mixed-age classes well. It has identified precisely what pupils should learn and when. However, some of the curriculum changes have not had sufficient time to impact on the outcomes of previous cohorts and, hence, historic published outcomes do not reflect how well prepared current pupils are for the next stage in their education.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In lessons, teachers typically provide pupils opportunities to revisit prior learning. This helps most pupils remember important content. However, in some subjects, the delivery of the curriculum is not consistent. Where this happens, pupils do not have enough opportunities to apply or deepen their understanding of what they have learned in line with their year group expectations. This means that some pupils do not develop a secure enough knowledge base and do not learn as well as they could.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has developed staff’s expertise in understanding pupils’ SEND needs. It identifies pupils’ needs in a timely way. However, there is not always clarity about the precise support that some pupils with SEND need to succeed in their learning. As a result, some pupils with SEND do not always benefit from the identified strategies which are intended to best help them in lessons or make progress in their learning.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Reading is of a high priority throughout school. Children learn to read quickly and fluently. Books are well matched to their phonics knowledge. The school checks pupils’ reading 29 and 30 April 2025
p.2
3
development closely and provides additional support for pupils who need extra practice. The school has introduced effective ways to develop pupils’ love of reading.
p.3
3
Children make a strong start in the early years. Staff prioritise developing children’s understanding of mathematics and literacy especially. The well-planned indoor and outdoor environment provides exciting learning opportunities. Children know and follow the routines and expectations of the school day well. They benefit from the songs and visual prompts that help them to do this. This contributes to their increasing independence. Children enjoy the responsibilities they have to take care of and tidy up classroom areas. They are well prepared for Year 1.
p.3
3
The school offers a wide range of well-chosen opportunities to promote pupils’ personal development. Through the ‘Micklefield Milestones’, all pupils engage in experiences such as museum visits, author talks and performances as part of their primary school journey. The personal, social and health education curriculum and daily reflection time helps pupils develop values such as empathy and resilience.
p.3
3
Pupils behave well in lessons and around school. The school’s actions to raise attendance are having a positive impact, but attendance rates remain below national figures. Too many pupils are not in school often enough. This means they miss out on important learning.
p.3
3
Leaders and those responsible for governance are highly committed to the school’s improvement journey. Staff benefit from the professional development and school improvement systems provided by the trust. They feel valued and supported, and workload is carefully managed. Those responsible for governance know the school well. They provide effective challenge and support. Consequently, the school is moving from strength to strength in all areas of its work.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, the delivery of the curriculum is not consistent. This means that pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to revisit or apply the important knowledge and skills they need to. Consequently, some pupils do not build the important knowledge cumulatively or develop a secure knowledge base. The trust should ensure all staff have a secure understanding of the curriculum expectations for each year group and pupils have sufficient time to deepen their knowledge and skills. The support that pupils with SEND receive is not consistent across the school. As a result, some pupils with SEND do not learn as well as they could. The trust should ensure that there is clarity around the precise support pupils with SEND need and 29 and 30 April 2025
p.3
4
should also ensure that all staff understand how to implement planned support effectively so that pupils with SEND learn and achieve highly. Too many pupils do not attend school regularly enough. This limits their learning and progress. The trust should continue to refine and strengthen its work to raise attendance and ensure that pupils’ attendance is high.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked-after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 29 and 30 April 2025
p.4
School details
[For academy] CEO of the trust Janet Sheriff OBE
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of Collaborative Learning Trust. This is a Church of England school. The school’s last section 48 inspection took place in March 2023. This is smaller than the average-sized school. Pupils are taught in mixed-age classes. Pupils in key stage 1 are taught together. There is a key stage 2 class comprising of pupils from Years 3 to 6. The school provides a breakfast club. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and provision). 29 and 30 April 2025
p.5
6
Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.6
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke to senior leaders, including representatives from the board of trustees, diocese and members of the governing body. Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also spoke to leaders about pupils’ learning in some other subjects. Inspectors listened to a range of pupils from different year groups reading to a familiar adult.
p.6
6
To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors met the SEND coordinator, spoke to pupils with SEND and reviewed plans to support these pupils. They visited lessons to see how pupils with SEND are supported. Inspectors visited the early years provision to check safeguarding arrangements and discuss the learning with children and leaders. Inspectors observed behaviour at the start of the day, at lunchtimes and in lessons. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey and staff survey. They also considered responses to Ofsted Parent View, including any free-text comments.
p.6
Inspection team
Georgina Chinaka, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Paul Higginbottom Ofsted Inspector 29 and 30 April 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked-after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion