Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Henlow Church of England Academy

Inspected 30 Apr 2025 · published 9 Jun 2025 · URN 138027

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Dick (lead), Rakesh Patel, Simon Warburton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Apr 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Dick, Rakesh Patel, Simon Warburton

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SG16 6AN

  • Name on report verified

    Henlow Church of England Academy

  • URN verified

    138027

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveenjoyhigh expectationseffectiveambitiousenthusiasmproudpositively
Criticismnot alwaysinconsistentgapsnot confident

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1032w+60
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,007
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
19%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 43%

Full report text

Inspection of Henlow Church of England Academy Church Road, Henlow, Bedfordshire SG16 6AN

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Caren Earp. This school is part of the Poppy Hill Church of England Multi Academy Trust, which means that other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Caren Earp, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Perry Melvin Huntley. 29 and 30 April 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils welcome the school’s friendly and inclusive culture. The HENLOW values of honesty, enthusiasm, nurture, originality and wisdom are evident in the positive relationships reflected in daily school life.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are expected to work hard and to behave well. Most pupils rise to these expectations. Typically, they achieve at least as well as others nationally by the end of Year 11. Those who need extra help are supported to improve.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe. They know that staff will assist if they are worried. Pupils are taught to make safe choices, including when using social media and playing games online. They socialise well together. Bullying is rare. If it happens, it is dealt with appropriately.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils benefit from a curriculum which allows them to develop personally as well as achieve academically. Most pupils enjoy their learning and the wider opportunities on offer. They are proud of their responsibilities, such as being prefects and pupil librarians. The pupil-led ‘school action group’ represents its peers’ views to leaders. In these roles, pupils contribute positively to the school community, while building leadership and teamwork skills. The curriculum ensures that pupils are prepared well for their next stage in education, employment and/or training.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has redesigned the curriculum to support the extended age range of the pupils that it now serves. High expectations underpin the school’s aspiration for all pupils to achieve well. The number of pupils taking GCSE subjects that make up the English Baccalaureate is increasing. This is because more pupils now choose to study a modern foreign language.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In 2024, the school’s first cohort of Year 11 pupils achieved broadly in line with others nationally, overall. The focus on continuous improvement continues to raise standards, including in mathematics and for different pupil groups. Staff identify pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities promptly and support them effectively to learn alongside their peers. For a few pupils who need extra time to settle into secondary school, individual programmes offer tailored support. In most cases, this ensures that these pupils return quickly to their mainstream classes.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The ambitious curriculum is logically sequenced. New learning builds on the content previously taught. Key knowledge and skills are revisited in different contexts, so that pupils remember more over time. Teachers have good subject knowledge. They use this to check pupils’ learning so that misconceptions or gaps in knowledge and skills are addressed promptly. Occasionally, teachers do not use all the information they have to adapt learning activities precisely to meet pupils’ different abilities. This means that sometimes pupils who could achieve more are not moved on quickly enough to the next stage of learning. 29 and 30 April 2025

p.2

3

The school promotes a love of reading. The library is well used. Pupils have frequent opportunities to read different literature. They are encouraged to read for pleasure, as well as in their studies, so they develop an appreciation of reading. Effective reading catch-up support is in place for pupils at the earlier stages of learning to read.

p.3

3

Most pupils behave well, attend school regularly and are punctual to lessons. Pupils’ personal development is supported appropriately, including through the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) programme, visiting speakers and assemblies. Pupils learn about respect and healthy relationships. Some staff, however, are less confident than others in delivering the programme’s content. This means that pupils do not always understand the important links across the different strands of their learning.

p.3

3

The careers education offer is well implemented. Pupils make informed choices when they leave school at the end of Year 11. Pupils enjoy the range of clubs, educational visits and taking part in activities such as The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme.

p.3

3

The school works closely with the trust and local governors to secure ongoing improvements in the quality of education for all pupils. Ambitions are high. Staff appreciate the positive focus on their workload and well-being, as well as the opportunities for continuous professional development. Relationships with parents and carers are typically positive.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In a few instances, the school does not use all the information available to adapt learning activities closely enough to pupils’ different abilities. This means that, at times, some pupils do not achieve as well as they could. The school should ensure that staff use information about pupils to match activities more closely to their abilities.  The delivery of the school’s PSHE programme is inconsistent. Consequently, pupils sometimes miss important connections, so they do not benefit fully from the different strands of their learning. The school should make sure that teachers are confident to deliver the PSHE programme so that pupils deepen their understanding across all aspects of the personal development offer. 29 and 30 April 2025

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 29 and 30 April 2025

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 11 and 12 September 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school became part of the Poppy Hill Church of England Multi Academy Trust in September 2021.  The headteacher is also the CEO of the trust.  As part of local authority changes planned at the time, in 2021 the school was redesignated from a middle school to a secondary school. As a result, it now provides education for pupils aged 11 to 16 years.  In this context, the first cohort of Year 11 pupils completed GCSE examinations in the summer term of 2024.  Pupils in Years 5 and 6 from the other school in the trust, Meppershall Primary Academy, are accommodated and taught on the Henlow site.  The school currently works with two alternative provisions. One provision is registered. The other is unregistered. 29 and 30 April 2025

p.5

6

 The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.  The most recent inspection of the school’s denominational education and collective worship, under section 48 of the Education Act 2005, took place in March 2025. The next section 48 inspection is due within eight years of this date.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors conducted deep dives in the following subjects: English, including reading, French, mathematics, science and physical education. To complete each deep dive, they discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons and spoke with teachers and other staff. They also spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work.  A wider curriculum sample was considered beyond the deep dives, including in humanities.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: looked at safeguarding policies, the school’s record of pre-employment checks on new staff and a sample of

p.6

Information about this inspection

child protection files; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The lead inspector spoke with trustees and a group of governors, including the chair of the local governing board.  Meetings were held with the headteacher, the designated safeguarding lead and other members of the safeguarding team. Inspectors held further meetings with the school’s special educational needs coordinator and other leaders.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation, behaviour logs, attendance records and school policies.  Inspectors considered the responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View. They also took into consideration the online survey responses from staff and pupils. 29 and 30 April 2025

p.6

Inspection team

Christine Dick, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Rakesh Patel His Majesty’s Inspector 29 and 30 April 2025

p.7

8

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion