Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by New Paradigm Social Limited in Liverpool
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
New Paradigm Social Limited
- Inspection date verified
30 Apr 2025
- Inspectors verified
Anthony Kyem
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2751090
- URN verified
2751090
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff have high expectations of behaviour and implement clear rules and boundaries to promote positive choices. p.4
- Inspection report for children’s home: 2751090 4 Staff formed highly effective partnerships with the police, social worker, and the child’s family. p.3
- Staff supported the child with a move that was well-planned and positive. p.3
- They developed strong relationships with the child and were skilled at listening and communicating with them. p.4
- Staff prioritised the child’s safety effectively and consistently followed robust risk management plans to protect them from harm. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Care & placements4
“So much so, that physical intervention was not used at all.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 883
- shorter than usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2751090 1 Registered provider: New Paradigm Social Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is run and operated by a private company. It provides care for one child who may have social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
There were no children living in the home at the time of this inspection.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted in December 2023.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2751090 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
17/04/2024 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2751090 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Since the last inspection, one child has recently moved out in early April 2025. The child lived at the home for just over a year, they shared with a number of professionals that they were happy and enjoyed living at the home. The child benefited from good quality care and enjoyed positive relationships with staff. However, they were moved out of the area for their safety.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff supported the child with a move that was well-planned and positive. The registered manager of the child’s new home said, ‘I can’t recommend the [previous] staff highly enough. They keep in regular contact and have provided us with all the information to ensure a smooth transition.’
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child made considerable progress at the home. They were kept safe and staff supported them to resume their education. A teacher said, ‘I think that the home provides a high standard of care for the child who attended our school. I do feel they provide excellent care.’
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff acted as positive role models for the child. As a result, the child benefited from trusted adults that they respected and looked up to.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff promoted family time to help sustain the child’s close relationships with the people who were most important to them. The child’s mother said, ‘He settled in there really well and had great relationships with the staff who went above and beyond.’
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff ensured that the child was healthy and had access to the services they needed to be healthy. The child’s health needs were met effectively. However, staff had not appropriately recorded a self-inflicted injury in the accident records when they took the child to hospital for treatment.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff provide a homely, welcoming, and comfortable living environment for children. Health and safety matters are addressed effectively to ensure a safe environment for children, visitors, and staff.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff prioritised the child’s safety effectively and consistently followed robust risk management plans to protect them from harm. The manager ensured that risk management plans were reviewed regularly, so that new behaviours and risks were quickly identified and considered. As a result, staff had a clear and positive understanding of the child’s risks and specific vulnerabilities. Inspection report for children’s home: 2751090 4 Staff formed highly effective partnerships with the police, social worker, and the child’s family. By working proactively with the child’s family and other professionals, staff were able to keep the child safe and reduce their risk of harm.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff managed the child’s behaviours safely. They developed strong relationships with the child and were skilled at listening and communicating with them. Consequently, staff were able to defuse behaviours and prevent incidents from escalating. So much so, that physical intervention was not used at all.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The use of consequences to address negative behaviour are fair and proportionate. Staff have high expectations of behaviour and implement clear rules and boundaries to promote positive choices.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff proactively searched for the child when they went missing from the home. On occasion, they found the child quickly and encouraged their safe return. A missing from home caseworker said, ‘Staff encouraged him to come and share his missing episodes. The placement is a lovely, friendly place, who went above and beyond to support the child.’
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The home is managed efficiently and effectively by an experienced registered manager who demonstrates good oversight of the care provided. The manager has recruited an experienced staff team who is supportive of each other and work well together.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff benefit from supportive relationships with the manager and the responsible individual. They enjoy working at the home and have high levels of job satisfaction. A staff member said, ‘Management is always supportive. We are always praised for our hard work and individual input.’
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff are well trained and suitably qualified. They are trained to meet the specific needs of children. Staff benefit from regular team meetings and practice-related supervision sessions. This ensures that staff can reflect on their practice and any areas for improvement or development.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
An independent person visits the home on a regular basis to review the quality and standards of care provided. These monitoring visits help staff, leaders, and managers to understand the strengths and weaknesses in their practice. The manager acts on feedback provided to address shortfalls to secure improvement in the care provided for children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff employed are recruited and vetted carefully to ensure that children are protected from unsuitable people. The manager has addressed the recommendation from the last inspection. Inspection report for children’s home: 2751090 5
p.4
Recommendation
The registered person should ensure that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective, and clear recording. Specifically, in relation to the recording of accidents. (‘Guide to the Children’s Home’s Regulations, including the quality standards,’ page 62, paragraph 14.4)
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2751090 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider: New Paradigm Social Limited
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 121 Lark Lane, Liverpool L17 8UR
p.6
Inspector
Anthony Kyem, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2751090 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion