Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Partou King Street Day Nursery & Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
28 Apr 2025
- URN verified
EY498557
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- On 10 March, we received further information from Local Authority Designated Officer that suggested the provider had failed to share all the information they had in relation to the initial concern. p.1
- We suspended the provider's registration on 10 March 2025 because we believe children may be at risk of harm. p.1
- Suspension allows time for the provider to take steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of harm to children. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 514
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 26 February 2025, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to Safeguarding policies and procedures. On 3 March 2025, we carried out a regulatory visit and found that the provider was meeting the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 10 March, we received further information from Local Authority Designated Officer that suggested the provider had failed to share all the information they had in relation to the initial concern. This raised concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to Safeguarding policies and procedures. We liaised with other professionals who are investigating the safeguarding concerns.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We suspended the provider's registration on 10 March 2025 because we believe children may be at risk of harm. Suspension allows time for the provider to take steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of harm to children. The provider has a right to appeal against a suspension. The provider may not provide childcare for which registration is required while the suspension is in place and may commit an offence if they do so.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 3 April 2025, we met with the nominated individual to discuss safeguarding arrangements at the setting. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that the safeguarding policy and procedure is in line with the guidance and procedures of the Local Safeguarding Partners
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that all staff including the designated safeguarding lead understand and follow the procedures in place for child protection and safeguarding
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that the procedure to recruit staff and monitor ongoing suitability is robust and is followed by managers n implement effective procedures to supervise staff and manage performance.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 15 May 2025, we conducted a visit to monitor the setting's progress towards meeting the actions set in the welfare requirement notice. We have also reviewed the provider's plan for improvement and met with the nominated individual. The provider requires further time to fully meet the actions. Therefore, we have given the provider further time. They are now required to meet the actions by 2 June 2025.
p.2
Summary of outcome
We will continue to liaise with other professionals who are leading the investigation, and we will monitor the provider's response to ensure the actions are successfully completed. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion