Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Magnus Church of England Academy

Inspected 5 Mar 2025 · published 23 May 2025 · URN 140549

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Damian Painton (lead), Thomas Wraith (lead), Ben Hill, David Mills, Gulbanu Kader, Mark Rhatigan, Matthew Sammy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    5 Mar 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Ben Hill, Damian Painton, David Mills, Gulbanu Kader, Mark Rhatigan, Matthew Sammy, Thomas Wraith

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NG24 4AB

  • Name on report verified

    Magnus Church of England Academy

  • URN verified

    140549

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh expectationseffectiveeffectivelyenjoywell supportedconsistentlywell-designed
Criticismgapsnot consistentlyerrorsvariablestrugglenot effectivelynot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1220w+52
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,198
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 40%

Full report text

Inspection of Magnus Church of England Academy Earp Avenue, Newark, Nottinghamshire NG24 4AB

p.1

Inspection dates: 4 and 5 February, and 5 March 2025

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Anna Martin. This school is part of Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham Multi-Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Chris Moodie, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by John Hunter. 4 and 5 February, and 5 March 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils, staff and parents describe Magnus Academy as a school with a ‘family feel’ where everyone is included. One parent, typical of many, said, ‘My daughter is very lucky to be part of the Magnus family; she isn’t just a number, she is seen and supported as an individual.’

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Most pupils behave well in lessons and around the school. Pupils are polite and respectful. Relationships between pupils and staff are warm. Pupils are cared for and supported well by adults. This helps them to feel safe.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high aspirations for pupils. It is working to make improvements to the quality of education that they receive. These are not implemented consistently. As a result, pupils do not learn or achieve as well as they are capable.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school provides a broad range of opportunities for pupils to develop their talents and interests, including sports clubs, the school show, Combined Cadet Force and The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award. Pupils enjoy the valuable experiences they get from these activities. Sixth-form students contribute to school life, for example as reading or peer mentors.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school is led with a strong moral purpose. Decisions are made in the best interests of pupils and families. This reflects the inclusive, ethos of the school.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s well-designed curriculum is ambitious for pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils in key stages 4 and 5 select from a broad range of subjects that allows them to pursue their interests. Across subjects, the school has identified the knowledge that pupils will learn. This provides clarity to staff about what pupils should know and by when.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers have strong subject knowledge which they use to present information clearly. However, checks on pupils’ understanding are often not done effectively enough. As a result, pupils do not receive consistently clear feedback. Sometimes, gaps and errors in their learning are not resolved or teachers move on before pupils are ready. When this is the case, pupils struggle with subsequent learning. As a result, pupils do not achieve as well as they should.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers receive accurate information about the needs of pupils with SEND. The school has trained teachers in how to use this information to meet pupils’ needs. However, teachers do not adapt their teaching consistently well. When this happens, pupils’ progress through the curriculum slows. The teaching of the curriculum is stronger in the sixth form. Sixth-form classes are small and teachers know students well. Teachers provide individualised feedback and support, which students value. As a result, students in the sixth form achieve more strongly. 4 and 5 February, and 5 March 2025

p.2

3

The school promotes reading through a recommended reading list for each year group, ‘The Magnus Canon’, as well as author visits and a well-resourced library. Pupils who need extra help with reading are well supported by specialist staff. This is enabling them to catch up.

p.3

3

The school has prioritised actions to improve pupils’ attendance and behaviour. As a result of this effective work, attendance is improving. Consequently, they miss less learning and benefit more fully from the school’s wider offer.

p.3

3

Pupils benefit from a strong personal development offer. The personal, social and health education curriculum ensures that pupils are well prepared for life beyond school. Pupils have an age-appropriate understanding of relationships, staying healthy and keeping themselves safe. The school’s strong focus on equality and diversity means that pupils understand and respect difference. Enrichment sessions and school trips provide rich opportunities for pupils to enjoy new activities and develop new skills. Pupils appreciate these experiences.

p.3

3

The school’s strong careers programme ensures that pupils are well informed about possible next steps in education, employment or training. They receive information from local employers and education providers, as well as personalised careers advice. Older pupils benefit from completing work experience placements.

p.3

3

Leaders have taken effective action to improve some areas of the school, such as attendance. The school’s actions to improve the quality of education so that pupils achieve consistently well are at an earlier stage. Staff have received relevant support and training but are still developing how they translate these into practice. The implementation of the curriculum is variable. Governors and the trust know the school well. Although there are appropriate systems in place to check on the school’s work, these have not secured the improvements needed in pupils’ outcomes.

p.3

3

Staff feel well supported by leaders and are proud to work at the school. They appreciate the regular support and training that they receive. Most parents are positive about the care and breadth of opportunities provided by the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Teachers do not check pupils’ understanding effectively enough. Sometimes teachers move on before all pupils are ready to do so. Pupils do not get clear feedback, and gaps and errors in their learning are not resolved, which means they do not achieve as well as they should. The school should ensure that teachers check pupils’ 4 and 5 February, and 5 March 2025

p.3

4

understanding systematically, using information from these checks to close gaps in pupils’ knowledge effectively.  Sometimes, teaching is not adapted sufficiently well to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. As a result, these pupils do not make the progress through the curriculum that they should. The school should ensure that teachers adjust their teaching effectively so that pupils with SEND achieve consistently well.  The school’s recent improvements to the quality of education are at a relatively early stage. While the school has provided support and training for staff, the implementation of the curriculum is variable. The school and the trust should ensure that high expectations for teaching and pupils’ outcomes are translated into practice securely well.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 February, and 5 March 2025

p.4

School details

Local authority Nottinghamshire County Council

p.5

form

Dates of previous inspection 30 April and 1 May 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham Multi-Academy Trust. The school joined the trust in February 2014.  This is a Church of England academy. The most recent section 48 inspection took place in February 2018. The next inspection is due in 2026.  The school uses one registered alternative provision.  The school hosts a provision called ‘Maple’ for pupils in key stage 3. A small number of pupils from other schools also attend this provision. All pupils remain dual registered with their home school.  The school runs one off-site alternative provision unit (also called ‘Maple’) for key stage 4 pupils, located on Quibbel’s Lane, Newark. 4 and 5 February, and 5 March 2025

p.5

6

 The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspection started on 4 February 2025. Inspectors returned on 5 March 2025 to gather additional evidence in line with Ofsted inspections and visits: Deferring, pausing and gathering additional evidence policy.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors spoke with the headteacher and a range of other leaders, including the

p.6

Information about this inspection

designated safeguarding lead and the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, design and technology, history and mathematics. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also discussed the curriculum and visited lessons and reviewed pupils’ work in some other subjects.  Inspectors visited tutorial sessions and assemblies.  Inspectors met with early career teachers and with the staff involved in their induction.  Inspectors met with groups of pupils from a range of year groups, including pupils with SEND. Inspectors spoke with pupils at breaktime and lunchtime.  Inspectors spoke to staff and spoke to pupils from the alternative provision unit.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text

p.6

Information about this inspection

responses. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil questionnaires. 4 and 5 February, and 5 March 2025

p.6

7

 An inspector met with members of the governing body. They also spoke to the CEO of the trust and the director of education from the Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour at breaktimes and lunchtimes.  Inspectors reviewed a wide range of documentation provided by the school, including documents on the school’s website.

p.7

Inspection team

Damian Painton, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Thomas Wraith, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Ben Hill His Majesty’s Inspector 4 and 5 February, and 5 March 2025

p.7

8

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion