Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)

Northern Regeneration CIC

Inspected 14 Mar 2025 · published 21 May 2025 · URN 2626884

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Mar 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Alison Dennis, Emma Hemmings, Ian Frear, Lynne Paxton, Steve Hunsley

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Northern Regeneration CIC

  • URN verified

    2626884

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 61% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyhigh-qualityskilledpositiveenjoyconfidentfeel safeskilfully
Criticismtoo fewpoortoo manyfailweaknessestoo slowtoo oftendelays

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguardingWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings990w−25
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve112w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,075
about usual (typical 1238)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 40
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 7
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Apprenticeships Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Information about this provider

Northern Regeneration CIC is an independent learning provider with its head office in Scarborough. It offers construction apprenticeships, predominantly at level 2, in a range of national skills shortage subjects and one level 3 apprenticeship in electrical installation. At the time of this inspection, there were 139 apprentices enrolled at the provider, of whom around two thirds were aged 16 to 18. Almost all apprentices were male. In the last 12 months, leaders have started to provide Skills Bootcamps in a few construction subjects. However, at the time of this inspection there were no learners in training. Most apprentices attend day or short, block-release training at the Scarborough Skills Village. The new specialist scaffolding training takes place at the North Shields site in Northumberland. 11 to 14 March 2025

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Too few apprentices attend their off-the-job training sessions. Staff are too willing to allow apprentices to stay at work rather than attend taught sessions, and they do too little to help apprentices catch up the learning they miss from those sessions. When apprentices do attend training, too few receive demanding enough theoretical or practical training that pushes them to be more resilient, hardworking construction and skilled employees.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Most apprentices behave well. In functional skills, for example, apprentices work together effectively to solve mathematical problems, such as how to calculate the resistance in electrical circuits. However, in a few instances in level 2 joinery, apprentices use inappropriate language in their training sessions. This is not challenged well enough by trainers.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices have positive attitudes to their learning and enjoy their time at the training centre. They value learning about health and safety practices, such as in groundworks where apprentices learn how to lift and handle paving blocks without injuring their back. Apprentices appreciate learning about such techniques to safeguard their physical health.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Trainers create classroom environments in which apprentices feel comfortable and confident to share information about their personal experiences of life and work. Apprentices report that they feel safe and supported in the workplace and during their off-the-job training. They know that there are staff at the provider who would support them if there was a need to do so.

p.2

better?

Leaders have been too slow to act on most of the areas for improvement from the previous inspection. Although the quality of teaching is poor, leaders have continued to expand their provision. Despite their good vocational knowledge, most trainers still need to complete appropriate assessor and teacher training qualifications. This is a longstanding improvement priority.

p.2

better?

Too few apprentices complete their apprenticeship. Too many of those apprentices who are currently in training are already beyond their expected completion date. Too often, employers do not stay committed to their apprentices’ training, or apprentices leave early to earn additional income as unskilled, but better paid, workers.

p.2

better?

Trainers do not plan the curriculum content skilfully to enable apprentices to gain a secure knowledge of their subjects. For example, in level 2 site carpentry, too few apprentices have the underpinning knowledge, or hand skills, to practise roof construction adequately. This delays their own learning as well as that of their peers, who must wait for them to catch up. Apprentices on the scaffolding apprenticeship benefit from a curriculum that is more effectively sequenced. 11 to 14 March 2025

p.2

3

Most teaching is of a poor quality, and trainers do not set work of an appropriate level for the apprenticeship being studied. Consequently, most apprentices’ work is below the required standard of their apprenticeship. For example, level 2 site carpentry and level 2 bricklaying apprentices complete theoretical work at entry level 3 and level 1 as their main curriculum content. However, level 3 electrical installation apprentices complete work at the expected standard.

p.3

3

Trainers do not evaluate well enough apprentices’ understanding or what learning may need to be revisited or reinforced. In too many subjects, such as in groundworks and site carpentry, trainers do not mark apprentices’ work and so apprentices do not know how to improve. Staff do not make it clear enough to apprentices what knowledge, skills and behaviours they are developing.

p.3

3

Leaders’ oversight of the quality of training is poor. Leaders do not recognise fundamentally weak teaching and assessment practices. They have in place processes to help them understand the quality of their provision, such as carrying out lesson visits. However, they do not use the information from these activities effectively to improve the quality of provision.

p.3

3

Trainers ensure that apprentices with identified additional learning needs receive the support they need to complete their apprenticeship. For example, in level 3 electrical installation, the few apprentices who applied for additional time to complete their examinations, due to their learning need, received extra time to complete their end- point assessment.

p.3

3

Those apprentices who need functional skills qualifications as part of their apprenticeship achieve these qualifications well. A high proportion pass at their first attempt, and those who fail pass at subsequent attempts. However, trainers do not routinely help apprentices to improve their English skills. Most trainers do not identify poor spelling and grammatical errors in apprentices’ work. Consequently, apprentices continue to repeat mistakes in their theory work throughout their apprenticeship.

p.3

3

Apprentices develop and use mathematical skills appropriately as an integral part of their training and in their job roles. For example, groundworks apprentices use ratios effectively to ensure that the sand, cement and water mix is correct for screed footpaths. Electrical installation apprentices use Ohm’s Law to determine electrical loads and the voltage requirements of electrical circuits.

p.3

3

Leaders use the expertise of guest speakers and local charities effectively to help apprentices understand matters such as drug and substance abuse, online safety and county lines. Leaders invite specialist partners, such as local sexual health charities, into the training centre to deliver sex education to apprentices.

p.3

3

In a few instances, apprentices are involved in community projects. These include completing groundworks for a local community garden, and fundraising for a construction charity which supports construction workers with a range of well-being issues. 11 to 14 March 2025

p.3

4

Trainers do not provide apprentices with sufficient careers education, advice and guidance. Too few apprentices are clear about their potential next steps, including those at the end of their apprenticeship.

p.4

4

Non-executive directors (NEDs) do not hold leaders effectively to account. They rely too much on what they are told about the quality of provision by senior leaders. NEDs do not interrogate this information well enough to understand the strengths and critical areas for improvement in the provision. They consider that the quality of training is much better than it is.

p.4

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.4

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Rapidly address the weaknesses in the planning, sequencing and delivery of apprenticeships so that all apprentices receive good-quality training.  Provide apprentices with training that is appropriate to the level of the apprenticeship studied.  Help apprentices attend their training days, using the information about what apprentices know and can do to coordinate their training with employers.  Provide apprentices with high-quality, relevant careers information and guidance.  Set and implement clear and measurable actions to improve the quality of teaching for apprentices.  Provide employers and apprentices with information about the long-term merits of the apprenticeship so a higher proportion of apprentices stay and achieve. 11 to 14 March 2025

p.4

Provider details

Address Scarborough Construction Skills Village Musham Bank Road, Eastfield Scarborough YO11 3XU

p.5

Provider details

Principal, CEO or equivalent Graham Ratcliffe

p.5

Provider details

Provider type Independent learning provider

p.5

Provider details

Date of previous inspection 1 to 4 November 2022

p.5

Provider details

Main subcontractors Not applicable 11 to 14 March 2025

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the director of quality, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.6

Inspection team

Ian Frear, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Lynne Paxton Ofsted Inspector Emma Hemmings Ofsted Inspector Steve Hunsley Ofsted Inspector Alison Dennis His Majesty’s Inspector 11 to 14 March 2025

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion