Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Clayton, Beverley
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
2 May 2025
- URN verified
207443
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. p.1
- We found that the provider had improved how they gather information from parents to ensure they have clear details about children's specific dietary requirements and any food allergies they need to act on. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 298
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 17 April 2025, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to risk assessment, food and drink and information and record keeping.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 2 May 2025, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. Actions needed by 16 May 2025:
p.1
Summary of outcome
n improve how information is obtained about children's specific dietary requirements, food allergies and ensure this information is acted on
p.1
Summary of outcome
n improve how records are maintained to ensure the needs of all children are met.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 14 May 2025, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had improved how they gather information from parents to ensure they have clear details about children's specific dietary requirements and any food allergies they need to act on. The provider has improved how they keep records and information from parents to ensure children's individual needs are met. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion