Summary
Kevin Sexton (lead), David Bell, Eleanor Overland, Tim Long
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Mar 2025
- Inspectors verified
David Bell, Eleanor Overland, Kevin Sexton, Tim Long
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SK14 8LW
- Name on report verified
Longdendale High School
- URN verified
148431
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Strong and determined leadership has driven positive change and the school’s standards are starting to rise. p.2
- Pupils successfully transition to high-quality destinations after leaving the school. p.3
- Pupils enjoy a rich, diverse curriculum that covers many subjects. p.2
- Most pupils meet the school’s high expectations for behaviour. p.2
- The school has strong processes in place for accurately identifying pupils’ additional needs. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This, coupled with weaknesses in the curriculum delivery, means that some pupils with SEND do not progress as well as they should through the curriculum. 25 and 26 March 2025 p.2
- This uneven curriculum delivery hinders some pupils from learning all that they should. p.2
- The school should ensure that the gaps in these pupils’ reading knowledge are identified and remedied swiftly. 25 and 26 March 2025 p.3
- Despite this, some pupils do not achieve as well as they should. p.2
- It has carefully considered what pupils need to learn and the order in which they should learn it. p.2
- Trust leaders, the local governing body, and senior leaders know what needs to change. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment6
“The school has ensured that teachers have strong subject knowledge.” p.2Personal development3
“The school has a well-designed careers programme.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,031
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Longdendale High School Spring Street, Hyde SK14 8LW
p.1
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Michael Chiles. This school is part of The Stamford Park Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Anton McGrath, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Stephen Foote. 25 and 26 March 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school
Since the last inspection, pupils are benefiting from considerable improvements to the quality of education that they receive. Strong and determined leadership has driven positive change and the school’s standards are starting to rise. Despite this, some pupils do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school
The school wants every pupil to do well in their studies. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils enjoy a rich, diverse curriculum that covers many subjects. However, weaknesses in the delivery of the curriculum prevent some pupils, particularly pupils with SEND and those who are disadvantaged, from reaching their full potential.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school
Pupils feel happy and safe at school. They know how they should behave. Most pupils meet the school’s high expectations for behaviour. They typically display the values of ‘respect, resilience and aspiration’ in class and around school to build their Longdendale legacy. Pupils said that they benefit from the new rewards system. It encourages them to come to school and motivates them to do well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school
Pupils’ personal development is a strength of the school. Pupils learn to stay safe, to understand what constitutes healthy relationships, and to appreciate diversity. Pupils can participate in many clubs and activities, including criminology, darts, football, cake design and musical performances.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has overhauled the curriculum. It has carefully considered what pupils need to learn and the order in which they should learn it. The curriculum is designed well so that learning can flow smoothly across all key stages. This approach is making it easier for pupils to build successfully on their prior knowledge. However, while these improvements are benefiting current pupils at the school, they are not reflected in the published 2024 key stage 4 data.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has ensured that teachers have strong subject knowledge. Many teachers design effective learning and check for gaps in pupils’ understanding. This is helping to deepen pupils’ knowledge and progress. However, some teachers are still developing the necessary expertise to deliver their subject curriculums well. This uneven curriculum delivery hinders some pupils from learning all that they should.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has strong processes in place for accurately identifying pupils’ additional needs. Increasingly, the school is providing teachers and support staff with quality information about each individual pupil’s needs. However, this work is in its infancy. While the school has developed a clear strategy to improve its SEND offer, it is too early to see the full impact of this work. This, coupled with weaknesses in the curriculum delivery, means that some pupils with SEND do not progress as well as they should through the curriculum. 25 and 26 March 2025
p.2
3
The school has overhauled its approaches to helping pupils who struggle with reading. Staff identify gaps in most pupils’ reading knowledge. Many pupils receive helpful support to improve their reading fluency. However, this renewed approach has not benefited some older pupils. This affects how well these pupils engage with the curriculum and hampers their learning.
p.3
3
Pupils behave well in class and around school. The school successfully resolves any behaviour issues when they arise. It has also taken effective action, through the use of well-thought-out strategies, to help pupils to attend school regularly and on time. Close collaboration with families is helping more pupils, particularly pupils with SEND or those who are disadvantaged, to attend on a regular basis. As a result, attendance is close to the national average. Pupils and staff welcome these improvements.
p.3
3
The school has a well-designed careers programme. Pupils learn about various career and educational opportunities. Trips and guest speakers connect pupils with local and national employers. Pupils successfully transition to high-quality destinations after leaving the school.
p.3
3
The school is on a rapid improvement journey and remains ambitious for pupils’ success. Trust leaders, the local governing body, and senior leaders know what needs to change. They ensure that staff receive quality training and effective professional development to support improvement priorities. Staff like working at this school. They shared with inspectors that leaders fully consider their workload and well-being when making decisions about the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, the delivery of the curriculum is uneven. This affects how well some pupils learn. The school should ensure that teachers are suitably equipped to deliver the curriculum consistently well. The implementation of the school’s revised SEND offer is in its early stages. As a result, some pupils with SEND do not get the full support that they need to be successful. The school should ensure that staff understand how to implement the revised SEND offer effectively. Some older pupils have not benefited from the school’s renewed approach to addressing gaps in reading knowledge. This impacts how well these pupils access the wider curriculum and hinders their success in lessons. The school should ensure that the gaps in these pupils’ reading knowledge are identified and remedied swiftly. 25 and 26 March 2025
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked-after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 25 and 26 March 2025
p.4
School details
Website www.longdendalehighschool.org.uk
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 2 and 3 February 2023, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of The Stamford Park Trust. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. The school uses three registered and four unregistered providers of alternative provision for a very small number of pupils.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth-form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 25 and 26 March 2025
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher, senior leaders, subject leaders and members of staff. The lead inspector met with members of the local governing body and some trustees, including the chair of the trust. The lead inspector also spoke with a representative of the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: history, English, mathematics, modern foreign languages and drama. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors considered the responses shared through Ofsted Parent View, including the
p.6
6
free-text comments. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s surveys for pupils and staff. Inspectors spoke to pupils about their experiences of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. They also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including the minutes of governors’ meetings, the school’s self-evaluation and development plan, records relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance and they reviewed samples of documentation relating to pupils with SEND. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.
p.6
Inspection team
Kevin Sexton, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Eleanor Overland Ofsted Inspector 25 and 26 March 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked-after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion