Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Bradford Forster Academy
Summary
Chris Sergeant (lead), Liz Cresswell, Rebekah Ramsden, Steve Lewis
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Feb 2025
- Inspectors verified
Chris Sergeant, Liz Cresswell, Rebekah Ramsden, Steve Lewis
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BD4 8RG
- Name on report verified
Bradford Forster Academy
- URN verified
140429
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, teachers are not clear enough about what they should be teaching and when this content should be taught. p.3
- The school should ensure that all staff consistently apply the behaviour policy, including when addressing poor language. p.3
- In some subjects, the school has not identified clearly the knowledge that pupils should learn. p.2
- In some subjects, the school has not accurately identified the important knowledge that pupils should learn. p.3
- This limits how quickly the school can make decisions about whether it needs to adapt or change these strategies. p.3
- The school should ensure that in all subjects, important knowledge is identified and sequenced coherently. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development6
“Pupils access a well-planned PSHE curriculum.” p.3Leadership & governance5
“They have a strong oversight of their statutory responsibilities.” p.3Progress & outcomes4
“The school is rightly proud of this achievement. 11 and 12 February 2025” p.2Reading & phonics3
“The school is beginning to prioritise reading.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,153
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 22%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Bradford Forster Academy Fenby Avenue, Bradford BD4 8RG
p.1
Inspection dates: 11 and 12 February 2025
p.1
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Inadequate
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Gemma Earles. This school is part of Bradford Diocesan Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Carol Dewhurst, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Tessa Mason. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils form positive relationships with staff at the school. Pupils have trusted members of staff to speak to if they have any concerns. Most pupils feel safe in school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Recently, the school has raised its standards and expectations. However, expectations of what pupils can achieve are still not high enough. Pupils’ achievement at the end of key stage 4 is considerably below the national average. This gap has narrowed over the past two years.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s expectations for pupils’ behaviour have increased since the previous inspection. Most pupils’ behaviour has improved. However, the poor behaviour of a minority of pupils sometimes disrupts learning. Their conduct in the corridors and at breaktimes can be boisterous, including the use of poor language. As a result, some pupils feel uncomfortable in the corridors.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school works closely with local charities to provide support for its pupils and families. The school offers a free breakfast for all pupils. The school’s extra-curricular offer includes a wide range of clubs to build on pupils’ talents and interests. However, the delivery of some elements of the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) curriculum are varied across the school.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In some subjects, the school has not identified clearly the knowledge that pupils should learn. Furthermore, the curriculum is not delivered consistently well. Teachers sometimes do not select the most effective learning activities. This limits the knowledge that pupils can learn. As a result, pupils do not learn as well in these subjects. In other subjects, the school has identified the knowledge that pupils should learn more clearly. This helps teachers to design learning more effectively. Pupils develop a stronger understanding of the curriculum in these subjects.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school is beginning to prioritise reading. For instance, all pupils take part in form time reading. In some subjects, teachers use carefully chosen texts to support the curriculum. The school identifies pupils who are struggling to read. The school supports these pupils to improve their reading skills. The school does not accurately monitor the impact of this support.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school identifies effectively any special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) that pupils may have. A small number of pupils access a bespoke curriculum. The support provided for these pupils is high quality. The school trains staff to support pupils with SEND in the classroom. Work is ongoing to ensure the consistent implementation of this support. The application of support for pupils with SEND in some lessons varies.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has developed a robust system to help pupils improve their attendance. As a result, pupils’ rates of attendance have improved considerably since the previous inspection. The school is rightly proud of this achievement. 11 and 12 February 2025
p.2
3
The school has clear systems for responding to poor behaviour. As a result, disruption to learning has decreased in classrooms. However, some staff do not apply these behaviour systems consistently. A small number of pupils do not respond to staff’s requests to meet basic behaviour standards. The school recognises pupils for positive contributions to school life in regular rewards assemblies. Pupils appreciate this recognition.
p.3
3
Pupils access a well-planned PSHE curriculum. However, the delivery of some aspects of this curriculum, for example the teaching of different faiths and religions, is not as consistent as other aspects. As a result, some pupils have gaps in their knowledge in some aspects of the PSHE curriculum. Careers provision is well considered. Pupils have repeated opportunities to engage in a broad range of careers encounters from Years 7 to 11.
p.3
3
The trustees and the local governing body work closely with school leaders. They have a strong oversight of their statutory responsibilities. However, the school does not evaluate effectively the impact of some of the strategies it uses. This limits how quickly the school can make decisions about whether it needs to adapt or change these strategies. Leaders are mindful of staff workload. Staff enjoy working at the school. They are proud to serve the pupils and the community.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, the school has not accurately identified the important knowledge that pupils should learn. As a result, teachers are not clear enough about what they should be teaching and when this content should be taught. This limits how well pupils learn or retain the key knowledge needed to achieve well in these subjects. The school should ensure that in all subjects, important knowledge is identified and sequenced coherently. Teachers do not consistently ensure that pupils receive work and activities that help them to remember what has been taught. As a result, some pupils cannot recall recent or prior learning. The school should ensure that teachers provide pupils with tasks that support them to build their knowledge securely. Some pupils do not behave well enough. They disrupt lessons and use poor language during unstructured times. In response to this, some staff do not apply the behaviour
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
policy consistently. As a result, some pupils feel uncomfortable in the corridors and are unable to learn during lessons. The school should ensure that all staff consistently apply the behaviour policy, including when addressing poor language. The school does not use all the information available to evaluate the impact of new strategies or curriculum developments. As a result, the impact of these changes on 11 and 12 February 2025
p.3
4
pupils is not always fully understood by the school to identify appropriate next steps within the curriculum developments. The school should ensure that leaders at all levels are supported to have a clear understanding of how to track the impact of new strategies or curriculum developments effectively.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 11 and 12 February 2025
p.4
School details
Website www.bradfordforsteracademy.co.uk
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 17 and 18 December 2024, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the Bradford Diocesan Academies Trust. The school appointed a new principal in September 2023. The school uses three unregistered alternative provisions. The school provides a breakfast club for its pupils. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form 11 and 12 February 2025
p.5
6
provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.6
6
In accordance with section 13(4) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.
p.6
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The lead inspector spoke with the CEO of the trust, members of the trust board, including the chair of the trust, and members of the local governing body, including the chair of governors. Inspectors met with the headteacher, other leaders and staff. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, history, geography and drama. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. Inspectors also considered the quality of education in some other curriculum subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central
p.6
6
record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in a range of situations, including in corridors, at social times, at transitions and in lessons. They also spoke with pupils about behaviour and bullying. Inspectors spoke with leaders, teachers and pupils about the school’s programme of personal development. Inspectors considered the views of pupils, parents and carers and staff through discussions and looking at information collected from Ofsted Parent View.
p.6
Inspection team
Chris Sergeant, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Steve Lewis Ofsted Inspector 11 and 12 February 2025
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion