Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection

Brierley Hill Primary School

Inspected 26 Mar 2025 · published 9 May 2025 · URN 103776

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Diane Pye

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Mar 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Diane Pye

  • Postcode verified

    DY5 2TD

  • Name on report verified

    Brierley Hill Primary School

  • URN verified

    103776

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 5% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedpositiveeffectiverigorousambitiousstrongconsistentfeel safe
Criticismtoo oftendeclineconcernsnot strongabsencenot clearseriousdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1395w−16
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,395
about usual (typical 1282)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 51
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 3
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: Brierley Hill Primary School Mill Street, Brierley Hill, West Midlands DY5 2TD

p.1

Outcome

Evidence gathered during this ungraded (section 8) inspection suggests that aspects of the school’s work may not be as strong as at the time of the previous inspection. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is going through a lot of change. After a decline in standards, and high pupil absence, fresh leadership has brought higher expectations. Pupils are responding well to these. This shows in their very positive behaviour, increasing attendance and attentive attitudes to learning.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils appreciate the school’s recent work to improve their education and raise their aspirations. For instance, they like having consistent and ambitious expectations for the quality of their work. This helps them to get better at different subjects. Pupils take pride in their achievements. They also benefit from the different sports and clubs on offer.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe at the school. They also feel valued because staff praise and encourage them. This helps pupils to feel good about themselves and what they can do. Relationships between pupils are positive. Disagreements between pupils happen occasionally, but staff support pupils to learn from experience and to develop empathy.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders and governors put pupils’ interests first. When necessary, they take decisive and effective action to bring about improvement in the school’s work. Nevertheless, there is still more to do to develop the quality of teaching and pupils’ learning in different subjects, and to increase attendance. However, the school has established a shared vision and ambition for all pupils to achieve well.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

After a period of decline, the quality of the school’s work is improving rapidly. This is because the school has made significant changes for the better. For example, it has 25 and 26 March 2025

p.1

2

established a stronger curriculum and higher expectations for learning, behaviour and attendance. In addition, the identification of and support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have improved. However, while standards are rising, some pupils do not achieve as well as they could.

p.2

2

Since the previous inspection, there have been high levels of pupil absence, and academic standards declined. The teaching of phonics slipped and pupils fell behind with their reading. Pupils’ achievement in other subjects also dipped.

p.2

2

The school has put a rigorous phonics scheme in place and has trained staff. There is a sharp focus on helping pupils catch up with lost learning. For example, all Year 1 pupils have been on a catch-up programme to plug gaps in their phonics knowledge. This is having a positive impact. In addition, the school has invested in new books and strengthened early years provision and now actively promotes reading across the whole school. As a result, pupils’ achievement in reading is improving. However, it is early days. These new systems are not firmly embedded, and pupils still have more lost learning to make up.

p.2

2

The rest of the curriculum, from early years to Year 6, has been renewed. Staff have clear curriculum guidance to follow. In different subjects, the school now sets out what pupils should know and when it should be taught. Staff have had training in how to implement this new curriculum. Furthermore, there are consistent classroom routines that ensure pupils understand the expectations for their learning and behaviour. These changes have strengthened the school’s offer and its ambition for what pupils should learn. The impact is evident in several subjects, for example in science. However, staff’s knowledge of how pupils make progress through the curriculum in different subjects varies. This means staff are not making the most of the new curriculum in their teaching. Staff are not clear enough about what subject content to emphasise in their teaching, and why.

p.2

2

Following the previous inspection, the school’s oversight of its work to support pupils with SEND lapsed. This decline has now been reversed. More recently, the school has done much to identify these pupils’ needs accurately, provide appropriate support and lift expectations of what can be achieved. This is a significant step forwards and is raising the school’s aspirations for all.

p.2

2

Alongside the changes to teaching and learning, leaders and staff are building pupils’ sense of belonging and pride in their school community. The school also looks beyond the immediate area to teach pupils about the wider world. For example, pupils recently visited London as part of their work about fundamental British values.

p.2

2

Over time, many pupils have been absent too often, which means they miss important learning. In response, the school’s leadership has established more rigorous procedures for challenging unnecessary absence. The school analyses attendance patterns, follows up unexplained absence promptly and contacts parents and carers about concerns. There are rewards for regular attendance and the improved curriculum helps the school to motivate 25 and 26 March 2025

p.2

3

pupils to attend. As a result, pupils’ attendance has improved. That said, a proportion of pupils still miss school too often for no good reason.

p.3

3

Staff appreciate the quality of leadership and the recent changes. They feel supported and guided to do their jobs well.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Until recently, phonics and reading have not been taught with sufficient rigour. This has led to a decline in standards and expectations. The school has now put new systems and higher expectations in place, but it is still early days. The school should ensure that its teaching of phonics and reading leads to strong achievement by pupils.  Staff’s knowledge of how pupils make progress in different foundation subjects is not consistently secure. They follow the school’s curriculum guidance but are not clear about which key knowledge to emphasise to pupils, and why. This holds back pupils’ achievement in these subjects. The school should support staff to implement the new curriculum in foundation subjects to best effect.  Too many pupils miss school too often for no good reason. This means they miss important learning and fall behind. The school should strengthen its work with families and professional services to support pupils to attend regularly.

p.3

Background

Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.

p.3

Background

We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. 25 and 26 March 2025

p.3

4

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in June 2016.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 25 and 26 March 2025

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 28 and 29 January 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school provides childcare at a breakfast club.  The school uses two registered alternative provisions.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspector considered published data about the school. The inspector also looked at a range of school documents. These included information about pupils’ behaviour, attendance, the curriculum, extra-curricular activities, school improvement planning, SEND, governance and documents published on the school’s website. 25 and 26 March 2025

p.5

6

 During the inspection, the inspector met with the executive headteacher, other leaders, school staff, pupils and governors. In addition, she spoke on the telephone with a representative of the local authority.  The inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector talked with pupils, parents and staff to gather general information about school life. She took account of the responses to Ofsted’s surveys of staff’s and parents’ views.  The inspector observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, at lunchtime, on the playground and at other times during the school day.

p.6

Inspection team

Diane Pye, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 25 and 26 March 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion