Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Everest Community Academy

Inspected 2 Apr 2025 · published 8 May 2025 · URN 145125

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Ellison (lead), Jane Cartwright, Marieke Forster, Peter Fry

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Apr 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Ellison, Jane Cartwright, Marieke Forster, Peter Fry

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    RG24 9UP

  • Name on report verified

    Everest Community Academy

  • URN verified

    145125

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoystrongambitiouswarmnurturingfeel safeconfidentproud
Criticismnot alwaysstruggledeclinenot effectivedisruptioninconsistentgapsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1016w−10
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
999
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 55
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of Everest Community Academy Oxford Way, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG24 9UP

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Alison Reid. The school is part of Bourne Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Alex Russell, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Andrew Field. 1 and 2 April 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils generally enjoy attending Everest Community Academy because of its strong sense of community. They appreciate that their teachers get to know them as individuals and create a warm and nurturing environment. Pupils feel safe in school and know that there are adults they can go to if they have a problem. Pupils recognise the significant improvements the school has made to behaviour. They typically say that bullying is uncommon and dealt with well when reported.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils do not achieve as well as they should at this school. They recognise that the school’s expectations of them have been raised substantially in the last year, but the education they receive is not always effective for all pupils. Some struggle to access the work in lessons, and this is not identified as quickly as it should be.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is a wide range of opportunities for pupils to take on leadership opportunities and contribute to their school community. There is an emphasis on rewarding pupils for their efforts and achievements, for example as part of weekly assemblies. Many pupils enjoy taking part in extra-curricular opportunities such as sporting teams or clubs linked to the curriculum.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has experienced a period of substantial disruption over the past few years. Several changes to leadership have coincided with other significant challenges, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pupils’ learning. Published outcomes for the school are well below the national average and dipped significantly last year. With the support of the trust, the school has responded robustly to this sharp decline. This includes adding additional leadership support and capacity to the school. Governors and trustees are rightly confident in the school’s current leadership, which has made a notable impact in a short period of time.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has put in place a suitably broad and ambitious curriculum. Within each subject area, it is clear what the school intends pupils to learn and in what order. This knowledge is arranged to enable pupils to build their understanding over time. However, the delivery of this curriculum in the classroom is not always effective. Sometimes pupils struggle to understand what is being taught and this is not identified during the lesson. For these pupils, gaps in their understanding persist and make future learning more difficult to access. While this is an issue for all pupils, it particularly affects those who are disadvantaged, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The school identifies pupils who need additional help with reading and ensures that these pupils benefit from a programme of support, including phonics, to help them catch up.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

New systems introduced by the school have helped to address a previous decline in standards of behaviour. Pupils now attend their lessons regularly and behaviour is typically calm. Although a small number of pupils are not fully engaged in learning, this continues to improve. The number of pupils who are suspended is reducing and sanctions are used proportionately. 1 and 2 April 2025

p.2

3

Personal, social, health and economic education is valued by pupils. They learn about important issues such as mental health, addiction and online safety. The school promotes an understanding of fundamental British values and pupils develop their knowledge of concepts such as democracy and the rule of law. There is a well-considered programme of careers information, advice and guidance.

p.3

3

The school and the trust are right to be proud of the recent improvements to the school’s culture and pupils’ behaviour. They are restoring the trust of parents and carers, an increasing number of whom say they would recommend the school. Leaders, including governors, have an accurate and realistic understanding of the improvements still required. Staff benefit from a broad development offer, but the impact of this is not yet fully evident in the way that the curriculum is delivered. Staff feel well supported to manage their workload and well-being.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Sometimes teachers do not check that pupils understand what they are being taught. This means that some pupils struggle with learning, but this is not identified during lessons. These pupils, some of whom have SEND, sometimes do not learn as well as they should. The school and trust must ensure that all teachers have the necessary expertise to identify when pupils need additional support or an adapted approach.  The impact of the school’s work to improve the quality of education is inconsistent. There is too much variability in how well the curriculum is delivered. The school and trust should check that their actions to improve the quality of education are having their intended impact and then make adjustments as necessary to improve their professional development offer.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 1 and 2 April 2025

p.3

4

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 1 and 2 April 2025

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 30 January 2024, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the school’s last graded inspection, the school’s headteacher has changed several times. The current headteacher was appointed substantively in June 2024.  The school is part of Bourne Education Trust.  The school currently uses nine alternative provisions, two of which are registered.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form 1 and 2 April 2025

p.5

6

provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with a range of senior staff including the headteacher, deputy headteacher and the deputy CEO of the trust. The lead inspector also met with the CEO of the trust and representatives of the governing body and board of trustees.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, languages, physical education and design and technology. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects and visited a range of other lessons.

p.6

6

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors spoke with a wide range of pupils and staff throughout the inspection. They considered survey responses from pupils, parents and staff.

p.6

Inspection team

Chris Ellison, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Jane Cartwright Ofsted Inspector 1 and 2 April 2025

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion