Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Bright Horizons Bramingham Day Nursery and Preschool
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
6 May 2025
- URN verified
EY291389
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 372
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 3 April 2025, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to Staff:child ratios, Accident and injury, Safety of premises and Risk assessment. The setting also notified us on the same day. The notification means that the provider met their legal responsibility as set out in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage to notify Ofsted of any significant event which is likely to affect the suitability of the early years provider to look after children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 10 April 2025 we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that the premises and equipment are fit for purpose
p.1
Summary of outcome
n take all reasonable steps to ensure staff and children are not exposed to risks and demonstrate how they are managing risks
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that all staff are trained to understand their roles and responsibilities, with particular reference to health and safety
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure information and records are completed and maintained accurately and in a way that keeps children safe.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 29 April 2025 we carried out a regulatory visit to monitor the notice served. We found that staff had received training to embed behavioural safety practices. The forms have been updated to reflect more thorough assessments and the premises had been repaired so that it is fit for purpose. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion