Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The St Leonards Academy

Inspected 29 Jan 2025 · published 30 Apr 2025 · URN 136400

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Linda Culling (lead), Charles Joseph, Christian Hicks, Elaine Parkinson, Louise Agley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Jan 2025

  • Inspectors verified

    Charles Joseph, Christian Hicks, Elaine Parkinson, Linda Culling, Louise Agley

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    TN38 8HH

  • Name on report verified

    The St Leonards Academy

  • URN verified

    136400

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−57Criticalmore positive than 3% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelypositiverobustconsistentlyfeel safestronglyeffectiverich
Criticismtoo fewgapspoorat riskdeficienciestoo manyinconsistentunsafe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1414w−60
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,393
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of The St Leonards Academy Edinburgh Campus, Edinburgh Road, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex TN38 8HH

p.1

Inspection dates: 28 and 29 January 2025

p.1

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

The principal of this school is Jon Francies. This school is part of the University of Brighton Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, John Smith, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Siobhan Denning. 28 and 29 January 2025

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s actions to improve pupils’ attendance and behaviour are not effective enough. Too many pupils miss vital time in school due to absence, so their learning is severely disrupted. A considerable minority of pupils do not respect each other or the school’s expectations for behaviour. The rate of suspensions remains too high and continues to increase. In lessons, many pupils’ attitudes to learning are generally positive. However, a substantial number fail to engage with their learning, and this is often not challenged by staff.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils feel safe in school. However, some pupils, and parents and carers, raised concerns with inspectors about how effectively the school deals with bullying. Derogatory language is too common and makes some pupils feel uncomfortable about their sexuality or religious beliefs. The school has a robust policy for dealing with bullying when it is reported, and staff provide appropriate support and sanctions when bullying is confirmed.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s ambitions for pupils’ achievement remain too low. Teaching does not routinely enable pupils to remember knowledge securely over time. In class, the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are not well met. Many pupils leave school without the qualifications they require for their next steps in education, employment or training.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has experienced much turbulence and uncertainty. This unsettling situation affects pupils, parents, and staff. Improvements to the curriculum and teaching are too slow. In a few subjects, pupils’ achievement is improving, but, in many, teaching is too inconsistent and does not focus on pupils’ learning strongly enough. The school has made a start to placing the English Baccalaureate subjects at the heart of the curriculum but has further work to do to address the underlying causes which are impeding this ambition.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has identified critical knowledge that pupils need to learn and remember. Sometimes, teachers provide opportunities for pupils to recall what they have learned. However, in most subjects, teachers do not check that pupils understand and remember important information before they move on. This means that pupils develop misconceptions, and gaps in their learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school does not prioritise reading strongly enough. The school does not support pupils who need help with comprehension and fluency, except in Year 7. Few pupils read for pleasure. Teachers do not teach and explain key vocabulary to pupils effectively enough.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In mainstream classes, teaching does not meet the needs of pupils with SEND. Pupils do not receive tailored support to help them understand or remember previous learning. Pupils in the specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND benefit from care and support to regulate their emotions. 28 and 29 January 2025

p.2

3

A significant minority of pupils misbehave and are suspended for poor behaviour. The school does not have an effective strategy for helping pupils catch up when they have missed vital work. This means pupils have large gaps in knowledge, skills or understanding. In lessons, many pupils have positive attitudes to learning, particularly in Years 10 and 11. However, some lack motivation, and this hinders their learning. Overall, most pupils’ behaviour is generally acceptable. However, as pupils join or leave lessons, they sometimes do so in an unruly fashion. This makes some pupils feel unsafe.

p.3

3

Too few pupils attend school regularly. The school has not done enough to prioritise the improvement of attendance for pupils with high absence rates. Systems to monitor attendance are new and emerging. Too many pupils miss vital learning and are at risk of falling further behind.

p.3

3

The provision for pupils’ personal development is inconsistent, and too few benefit from the opportunities offered. The curriculum for personal, social, and health education (PSHE) is designed to cover relevant and crucial information pupils need to know. However, the school does not ensure that pupils understand and remember this information. Although the school offers extra-curricular clubs, too few pupils are motivated to attend, and the school has not done enough to encourage disadvantaged pupils to make the most of these opportunities. Pupils receive independent careers advice and guidance. This helps them consider the next steps in their education.

p.3

3

The school has not acted swiftly enough to stem the decline in standards identified at the previous inspection. Areas of weakness are not identified accurately enough. The trust and local governors do not provide rigorous challenge to the school in order to secure the necessary improvements.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The trust and the school have not done enough to tackle the many weaknesses in the school. The school does not have an accurate understanding of its own deficiencies. Oversight and challenge from the trust is not robust enough. This means that pupils do not receive the quality of education they deserve. The trust should ensure that the school is supported to make the necessary changes, rapidly, for the benefit of pupils and the community it serves.  The school has not eradicated weaknesses in the curriculum and teaching swiftly enough. This means that pupils’ achievement remains poor. The school should focus its 28 and 29 January 2025

p.3

4

actions on those aspects of the curriculum and teaching that are most in need of improvement and rapidly rectify the shortcomings identified by this inspection.  Teachers’ checks on pupils’ learning do not enable them to know how well pupils learn the curriculum. Often gaps in knowledge or misconceptions go unaddressed. Pupils do not understand or remember key vocabulary. The school should ensure that teachers accurately identify misconceptions and gaps in pupils’ knowledge and vocabulary and then tackle these deficiencies in their subsequent teaching.  Teachers do not adapt their teaching to meet the needs of pupils with SEND effectively enough. This means that pupils with SEND are not supported to build knowledge and skills consistently well and do not attain the qualifications that they need to progress to their next stages of education, training or employment. The school should ensure that teachers know how to meet the needs of pupils with SEND effectively so that they

p.4

4

consistently achieve high standards.  Many pupils, particularly disadvantaged pupils, are often absent from school. The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent remains worryingly high. The rate of suspensions is high and not reducing. Too many pupils, therefore, miss vital learning and are at risk of falling even further behind. The school should ensure that it takes robust action so that attendance improves rapidly, persistent absence decreases, and the rate of suspensions reduces.  The school does not ensure that pupils remember critical knowledge and skills taught in PSHE. Furthermore, the school does not ensure that enough pupils benefit from a wide, rich set of experiences beyond the curriculum. This means that many do not develop skills or talents or take advantage of activities designed to develop cultural capital. The school should ensure that pupils understand and remember vital information taught in PSHE. The school should redouble its efforts to ensure that

p.4

4

pupils, particularly those who are disadvantaged, engage with the extra-curricular opportunities on offer.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and 28 and 29 January 2025

p.4

5

protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 28 and 29 January 2025

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,345

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 14 and 15 June 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act

p.6

Information about this school

 The school is a member of the University of Brighton Academies Trust.  The school has specially resourced provision for 18 pupils with autistic spectrum disorder and/or physical disability.  The school uses three registered and two unregistered providers of alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and 28 and 29 January 2025

p.6

7

management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.7

7

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

7

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The lead inspector met the director of school improvement from the trust, a trustee and the chair of the local governing body.  Inspectors met the principal, vice principal, head of academy, and other senior leaders including the special educational needs coordinator.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, modern foreign languages, art, physical education and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors visited a sample of lessons in other subjects, spoke with teachers and pupils

p.7

7

about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors spoke with groups of pupils and observed their behaviour at breaktime and lunchtime.  A wide range of the school’s documentation was taken into consideration, including minutes of the local governing body and trust committees, policies and the school’s own improvement plan.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors met with groups of staff and considered the opinions expressed through the online staff survey. Inspectors also took account of the views of parents and carers expressed through the online survey, Ofsted Parent View.

p.7

7

HMCI strongly recommends that the school does not seek to appoint early career teachers. The position regarding the appointment of early career teachers will be considered again during any monitoring inspection we carry out. 28 and 29 January 2025

p.7

Inspection team

Linda Culling, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Charles Joseph Ofsted Inspector 28 and 29 January 2025

p.8

9

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

9

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

9

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

9

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

9

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion