Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Yelland, Catherine Alison
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
10 Apr 2025
- URN verified
EY401174
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 327
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 10 March 2025, the provider notified us about information relating to the requirement Suitable people. The notification means that the provider met their legal responsibility as set out in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage to notify Ofsted of any information which is likely to affect the suitability of any person who cares for, or/is in regular contact with, children on the premises on which childminding is provided.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 8 April 2025, we carried out a regulatory telephone call/. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure the policy for sharing information through digital devices promotes children's welfare, with particular reference to assistants receiving and sharing information on personal mobile phones
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure all staff follow the EYFS requirements understand their responsibilities to disclose any information that may impact on their ability to care for children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider has updated the digital information policy and trained staff on this. Furthermore, she has informed parents about the new procedures. The provider has also procedures in place to ensure staff swiftly identify and report information that may impact their ability to care for children including frequent, meetings.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements. We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion